Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:47:02.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of metastable equilibria for determination of Gibbs energy of solids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. T. Jacob
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
S. Srikanth
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
Get access

Abstract

Attempts are made to measure activities of both components of a binary alloy (A–B) at 650 K using a solid-state galvanic cell incorporating a new composite solid electrolyte. Since the ionic conductivity of the composite solid electrolyte is three orders of magnitude higher than that of pure CaF2, the cell can be operated at lower temperatures. The alloy phase is equilibrated in separate experiments with flourides of each component and fluorine potential is measured. The mixture of the alloy (A–B) and the fluoride of the more reactive component (BF2) is stable, while (A–B) + AF2 mixture is metastable, Factors governing the possible use of metastable equilibria have been elucidated in this study. In the Co–Ni system, where the difference in Gibbs energies of formation of the fluorides is 21.4 kJ/mol, emf of the cell with metastable phases at the electrode is constant for periods ranging from 90 to 160 ks depending on alloy composition. Subsequently, the emf decreases because of the onset of the displacement reaction. In the Ni–Mn system, measurement of the activity of Ni using metastable equilibria is not fully successful at 650 K because of the large driving force for the displacement reaction (208.8 kJ/mol). Critical factors in the application of metastable equilibria are the driving force for displacement reaction and diffusion coefficients in both the alloy and fluoride solid solution.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Chatillon, C.Senillou, C.Allibert, M. and Pattoret, A.Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47, 334 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Jacob, K. T. in Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Metallurgical Processes, edited by Rao, M. Mohan, Abraham, K. P.Iyengar, G. N. K. and Mallya, R. M. (Indian Institute of Metals, Calcutta, 1981).Google Scholar
3Vaidehi, N.Akila, R.Shukla, A. K. and Jacob, K. T.Mater. Res. Bull. 21, 909 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Jacob, K. T. and Hajra, J. P.Bull. Mater. Sci. 9, 37 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Mah, D. A. and Pankratz, L. B.Bur. Mines Bull. 665, 21 (1976).Google Scholar
6Jacob, K. T.Srikanth, S. and Iyengar, G. N. K.Bull. Mater. Sci. 8, 71 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Srikanth, S. and Jacob, K. T. (unpublished results).Google Scholar
8Hultgren, R.Desai, P. D.Hawkins, D. T.Gleiser, M. and Kelly, K. K.Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973)Google Scholar
9Jacob, K. T.Metall. Trans. B 13, 283 (1982).Google Scholar
10Batalin, G. I.Stukalo, V. A. N. YNeschimenko, a. and Patselii, N. V., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 55, 1395 (1981).Google Scholar
11Venkatraman, M. and Hajra, J. P.Metall. Trans. A14, 2125 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Hultgren, R.Orr, R. L.Anderson, P. D. and Kelly, K. K.Selected Values of Thermodynamic Properties of Elements (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973).Google Scholar
13Akila, R. and Jacob, K. T.Solid State Ionics 25, 217 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar