Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T04:54:24.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimating probability of sustained recovery from mild to moderate depression in primary care: evidence from the THREAD study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2010

C. Dowrick*
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
C. Flach
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
M. Leese
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
J. Chatwin
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
R. Morriss
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
R. Peveler
Affiliation:
Division of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
M. Gabbay
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
R. Byng
Affiliation:
Institute of Health Services Research, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth, UK
M. Moore
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
A. Tylee
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
T. Kendrick
Affiliation:
Division of Primary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr C. Dowrick, MD, FRCGP, Division of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, LiverpoolL69 3GB, UK. (Email: cfd@liv.ac.uk)

Abstract

Background

It is important for doctors and patients to know what factors help recovery from depression. Our objectives were to predict the probability of sustained recovery for patients presenting with mild to moderate depression in primary care and to devise a means of estimating this probability on an individual basis.

Method

Participants in a randomized controlled trial were identified through general practitioners (GPs) around three academic centres in England. Participants were aged >18 years, with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores 12–19 inclusive, and at least one physical symptom on the Bradford Somatic Inventory (BSI). Baseline assessments included demographics, treatment preference, life events and difficulties and health and social care use. The outcome was sustained recovery, defined as HAMD score <8 at both 12 and 26 week follow-up. We produced a predictive model of outcome using logistic regression clustered by GP and created a probability tree to demonstrate estimated probability of recovery at the individual level.

Results

Of 220 participants, 74% provided HAMD scores at 12 and 26 weeks. A total of 39 (24%) achieved sustained recovery, associated with being female, married/cohabiting, having a low BSI score and receiving preferred treatment. A linear predictor gives individual probabilities for sustained recovery given specific characteristics and probability trees illustrate the range of probabilities and their uncertainties for some important combinations of factors.

Conclusions

Sustained recovery from mild to moderate depression in primary care appears more likely for women, people who are married or cohabiting, have few somatic symptoms and receive their preferred treatment.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akaike, H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Second International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267281. Akademiai Kiado: Budapest.Google Scholar
Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Vazquez-Barquero, JL, Dowrick, C, Lehtinen, V, Dalgard, OS, Casey, P, Wilkinson, C, Lasa, L, Page, H, Dunn, G, Wilkinson, G, the ODIN Group (2001). Depressive disorders in Europe: prevalence figures from the ODIN study. British Journal of Psychiatry 179, 308316.Google Scholar
Babor, TF, Grant, M (1989). From clinical research to secondary prevention: international collaboration in the development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol Health Research World 13, 371374.Google Scholar
Beecham, J, Knapp, M (1992). Costing psychiatric interventions. In Measuring Mental Health Needs (ed. Thornicroft, G., Brewin, C. and Wing, J.), pp. 163183. Gaskell: London.Google Scholar
Bifulco, A, Moran, PM, Ball, C, Bernazzani, O (2002) Adult attachment style: its relationship to clinical depression. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 37, 5059.Google Scholar
Brown, G, Harris, T (1978). Social Origins of Depression. Tavistock: London.Google Scholar
Brown, G, Harris, T, Kendrick, T, Chatwin, J, Craig, TK, Kelly, V, Mander, H, Ring, A, Wallace, V, Uher, R; Thread Study Group (2009). Antidepressants, social adversity and outcome of depression in general practice. Journal of Affective Disorders. Published online: 7 July 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.004.Google Scholar
Casey, P, Birbeck, G, McDonagh, C, Dalgard, OS, Lehtinen, V, Britta, S, Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Dowrick, C (2004). Personality disorder, depression and functioning: results from the ODIN study. Journal of Affective Disorders 82, 277283.Google Scholar
Conradi, H, de Jonge, P, Ormel, J (2008). Prediction of the three-year course of recurrent depression in primary care patients: different risk factors for different outcomes. Journal of Affective Disorders 105, 267271.Google Scholar
Fortune, G, Barrowclough, C, Lobban, F (2004). Illness representations in depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 43, 347364.Google Scholar
Frank, E, Prien, RF, Jarrett, RB, Keller, MB, Kupfer, DJ, Lavori, PW, Rush, AJ, Weissman, MM (1991). Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder: remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. Archives of General Psychiatry 48, 851855.Google Scholar
Gureje, O, Simon, GE, Ustun, TB, Goldberg, DP (1997). Somatization in cross-cultural perspective: a World Health Organization study in primary care. American Journal of Psychiatry 154, 989995.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M (1967). Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 6, 296.Google Scholar
Hunot, VM, Horne, R, Leese, MN, Churchill, RC (2007). A cohort study of adherence to antidepressants in primary care: the influence of antidepressant concerns and treatment preferences. Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 9, 9199.Google Scholar
Jackson, J, Fiddler, M, Kapur, N, Wells, A, Tomenson, B, Creed, F (2006). Number of bodily symptoms predicts outcome more accurately than health anxiety in patients attending neurology, cardiology and gastroenterology clinics. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 60, 357363.Google Scholar
Keller, M, Lavori, P, Mueller, T, Endicott, J, Coryell, W, Hirschfeld, RM, Shea, T (1992). Time to recovery, chronicity, and levels of psychopathology in major depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 49, 809816.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T, Chatwin, J, Dowrick, C, Tylee, A, Morriss, R, Peveler, R, Leese, M, McCrone, P, Harris, T, Moore, M, Byng, R, Brown, G, Barthel, S, Mander, H, Ring, A, Kelly, V, Wallace, V, Gabbay, M, Craig, T, Mann, A (2009). Randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors plus supportive care, versus supportive care alone, for mild to moderate depression with somatic symptoms in primary care: the THREAD (THREshold for AntiDepressant response) study. Health Technology Assessment 13, 1159.Google Scholar
King, M, Weich, S, Torres-González, F, Svab, I, Maaroos, HI, Neeleman, J, Xavier, M, Morris, R, Walker, C, Bellón-Saameño, JA, Moreno-Küstner, B, Rotar, D, Rifel, J, Aluoja, A, Kalda, R, Geerlings, MI, Carraça, I, de Almeida, MC, Vicente, B, Saldivia, S, Rioseco, P, Nazareth, I (2006). Prediction of depression in European general practice attendees: the PREDICT study. BMC Public Health 6, 6.Google Scholar
Lazary, J, Lazary, A, Gonda, X, Benko, A, Molnar, E, Juhasz, G, Bagdy, G (2008). New evidence for the association of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) haplotypes, threatening life events, and depressive phenotype. Biological Psychiatry 64, 498504.Google Scholar
Mattisson, C, Bogren, M, Horstmann, V, Munk-Jörgensen, P, Nettelbladt, P (2007). The long-term course of depressive disorders in the Lundby Study. Psychological Medicine 37, 883891.Google Scholar
Mumford, DB, Bavington, JT, Bhatnagar, KS, Hussain, Y, Mirza, S, Naraghi, MM (1991). The Bradford Somatic Inventory: a multi-ethnic inventory of somatic symptoms reported by anxious and depressed patients in Britain and the Indo-Pakistan Subcontinent. British Journal of Psychiatry 158, 379386.Google Scholar
NICE (2004). Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care. Clinical Guideline 23. British Psychological Society and Gaskell: London.Google Scholar
Peveler, R, Kendrick, A, Buxton, M, Longworth, L, Baldwin, D, Moore, M, Chatwin, J, Goddard, J, Thornett, A, Smith, H, Campbell, M, Thompson, C (2005). Randomised controlled trial to compare the cost effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine. Health Technology Assessment 9, 16.Google Scholar
Raue, PJ, Schulberg, HC, Heo, M, Klimstra, S, Bruce, ML (2009). Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome: a randomized primary care study. Psychiatric Services 60, 337343.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, L, Rayburn, N, Keeler, E, Ford, D, Rost, K, Sherbourne, C (2007). Predicting outcomes of primary care patients with major depression: development of a depression prognosis index. Psychiatric Services 58, 10491056.Google Scholar
Saghafi, R, Brown, C, Butters, MA, Cyranowski, J, Dew, MA, Frank, E, Gildengers, A, Karp, JF, Lenze, EJ, Lotrich, F, Martire, L, Mazumdar, S, Miller, MD, Mulsant, BH, Weber, E, Whyte, E, Morse, J, Stack, J, Houck, PR, Bensasi, S, Reynolds, CF 3rd (2007). Predicting 6-week treatment response to escitalopram pharmacotherapy in late-life major depressive disorder. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22, 11411146.Google Scholar
Simon, G, Ormel, J, VonKorff, M, Barlow, W (1995). Health care costs associated with depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care. American Journal of Psychiatry 152, 352357.Google Scholar
Thornicroft, G, Sartorius, N (1993). The course and outcome of depression in different cultures: 10 year follow up of the WHO collaborative study on the outcome of depressive disorders. Psychological Medicine 23, 10231032.Google Scholar
Watson, L, Baird, J, Hösel, V, Peveler, R (2009). The effect of concurrent pain on the management of patients with depression: an analysis of NHS healthcare resource utilisation using the GPRD database. International Journal of Clinical Practice 63, 698706.Google Scholar
van Weel-Baumgarten, E, Schers, H, van den Bosch, W, van den Hoogen, HJ, Zitman, FG (2000). Long-term follow-up of depression among patients in the community and in family practice settings: a systematic review. Journal of Family Practice 49, 11131120.Google Scholar
Weich, S, Patterson, J, Shaw, R, Stewart-Brown, S (2009). Family relationships in childhood and common psychiatric disorders in later life: systematic review of prospective studies. British Journal of Psychiatry 194, 392398.Google Scholar