Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:04:22.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulence measurements using a nanoscale thermal anemometry probe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

SEAN C. C. BAILEY ,
GARY J. KUNKEL ,
MARCUS HULTMARK ,
MARGIT VALLIKIVI ,
JEFFREY P. HILL ,
KARL A. MEYER ,
CANDICE TSAY ,
CRAIG B. ARNOLD  and
ALEXANDER J. SMITS
SEAN C. C. BAILEY*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
GARY J. KUNKEL
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
MARCUS HULTMARK
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
MARGIT VALLIKIVI
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
JEFFREY P. HILL
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
KARL A. MEYER
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
CANDICE TSAY
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
CRAIG B. ARNOLD
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
ALEXANDER J. SMITS
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
*
†Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40515, USA. Email address for correspondence: scbailey@engr.uky.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A nanoscale thermal anemometry probe (NSTAP) has been developed to measure velocity fluctuations at ultra-small scales. The sensing element is a free-standing platinum nanoscale wire, 100 nm × 2 μm × 60 μm, suspended between two current-carrying contacts and the sensor is an order of magnitude smaller than presently available commercial hot wires. The probe is constructed using standard semiconductor and MEMS manufacturing methods, which enables many probes to be manufactured simultaneously. Measurements were performed in grid-generated turbulence and compared to conventional hot-wire probes with a range of sensor lengths. The results demonstrate that the NSTAP behaves similarly to conventional hot-wire probes but with better spatial resolution and faster temporal response. The results are used to investigate spatial filtering effects, including the impact of spatial filtering on the probability density of velocity and velocity increment statistics.

JFM classification

Micro-/Nano-fluid dynamics: MEMS/NEMS Turbulent Flows: Turbulent Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 663 , 25 November 2010 , pp. 160 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Present address: Seagate Technology, Bloomington, MN 55435, USA

Present address: Aero/Fluids/Performance Group, Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, USA

∥

Present address: MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA 22102, USA

References

REFERENCES

Adrian, R. J., Johnston, R. E., Jones, B. G., Meratit, P. & Tung, A. C.-T. 1984 Aerodynamic disturbances of hot-wire probes and directional sensitivity. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 14, 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avilov, V. V. & Decker, I. 1994 Heat transfer to laminar flow across plates and cylinders of various cross sections. Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor Fiz. 59 (12), 851–855.Google Scholar
Bruun, H. H. 1995 Hot-Wire Anemometry. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Fan, Z., Zou, J., Engel, J. & Liu, C. 2003 Two-dimensional micromachined flow sensor array for fluid mechanics studies. J. Aerosp. Engng 16, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, C. C., Hutchis, N., Ooi, A. S. H. & Marusic, I. 2009 Use of direct numerical simulation (DNS) data to investigate spatial resolution issues in measurements of wall-bounded turbulence. Meas. Sci. Technol. 20, 115–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citriniti, J. H. & George, W. K. 1997 The reduction of spatial aliasing by long hot-wire anemometer probes. Exp. Fluids 23, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Foss, J. F. 2007 Thermal anemometry. In Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics (ed. Tropea, C., Yarin, A. L. & Foss, J. F.), pp. 229–287. Springer.Google Scholar
Ewing, D., Hussein, H. J. & George, W. K. 1995 Spatial resolution of parallel hot-wire probes for derivative measurements. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 11, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingerson, L. M. & Freymuth, P. 1983 Thermal anemometers. In Fluid Mechanics Measurements (ed. Goldstein, R. J.), pp. 99–154. Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Gad-El-Hak, M. 2001 The MEMS Handbook. CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C. M., Li, W., Garstenauer, M., Karan, K., Leu, T.-S. & Tai, Y.-C. 1993 Micromachined hot-point anemometer. Part II: Testing and calibration. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 38, 2234.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N., Nickels, T. B., Marusic, I. & Chong, M. S. 2009 Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 103–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F., Tai, Y.-C., Ho, C.-M., Karan, R. & Garstenauer, M. 1994 Theoretical and experimental studies of micromachined hot-wire anemometers. In International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, pp. 139–142. IEEE.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. C. & Falco, R. E. 1990 On accurately measuring statistics associated with small-scale structure in turbulent boundary layers using hot-wire probes. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, G. J., Arnold, C. B. & Smits, A. J. 2006 Development of NSTAP: nanoscale thermal anemometry probe. In 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA, June 5–8, 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-3718.Google Scholar
Li, J. D. 2004 Dynamic response of constant temperature hot-wire system in turbulence velocity measurements. Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 1835–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. D. 2006 Dynamic response of constant temperature hot-wire systems under various perturbations. Meas. Sci. Technol. 17, 2665–2675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. D., McKeon, B. J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. F. & Smits, A. J. 2004 The response of hot wires in high-Reynolds-number turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Technol. 15, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligrani, P. M. & Bradshaw, P. 1987 a Spatial resolution and measurement of turbulence in the viscous sublayer using subminiature hot-wire probes. Exp. Fluids 5, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligrani, P. M. & Bradshaw, P. 1987 b Subminiature hot-wire sensors: development and use. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 20, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfdahl, L., Stemme, G. & Johannson, B. 1989 A sensor based on silicon technology for turbulence measurements. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 22, 391–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfdahl, L., Stemme, G. & Johannson, B. 1992 Silicon based flow sensors for mean velocity and turbulence measurements. Exp. Fluids 12, 391–393.Google Scholar
Morris, S. C. & Foss, J. F 2003 Transient thermal response of a hot-wire anemometer. Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. F., McKeon, B. J., Jiang, W. & Smits, A. J. 2004 Scaling of the streamwise velocity component in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Smits, A. J. & Chong, M. S. 1979 The effect of certain low frequency phenomena on the calibration of hot wires. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai, Y.-C., Jiang, F., Liu, C., Wu, R. & Ho, C. M. 1993 Micromachined hot-point anemometer. Part I: Design and fabrication. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 38, 22–34.Google Scholar
Tavoularis, S. 2005 Measurement in Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willmarth, W. W. & Sharma, L. K. 1984 Study of turbulent structure with hot wires smaller than the viscous length. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyngaard, J. C. 1968 Measurement of small-scale turbulence structure with hot-wires. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 2 (2), 1105–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakhot, V., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2010 Scaling of global properties of turbulence and skin friction in pipe and channel flows. J. Fluid. Mech. 652, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagarola, M. V. & Smits, A. J. 1998 Mean flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid. Mech. 373, 33–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar