Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:04:28.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking the BEAST: Recent developments in multichannel composition at Birmingham ElectroAcoustic Sound Theatre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2010

Scott Wilson  and
Jonty Harrison
Scott Wilson*
Affiliation:
Birmingham ElectroAcoustic Sound Theatre, Music Department, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Jonty Harrison*
Affiliation:
Birmingham ElectroAcoustic Sound Theatre, Music Department, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
E-mail: *s.d.wilson.1@bham.ac.uk; **d.j.t.harrison@bham.ac.uk
E-mail: *s.d.wilson.1@bham.ac.uk; **d.j.t.harrison@bham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper outlines some recent developments in multichannel composition at the Electroacoustic Music Studios, University of Birmingham and its performance wing, BEAST (Birmingham ElectroAcoustic Sound Theatre). In doing so it attempts to codify and define some emerging aspects of spatialisation practice which are found both within the BEAST community and beyond. The discussion covers software and techniques developed and adapted for use with BEAST, new and pragmatic approaches to composing for large-scale multichannel systems, such as n-channel composition and composing in ‘stems’, and issues arising from a resulting blurring between composition and performance practices.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 15 , Issue 3: Sound ↔ Space: New approaches to multichannel music and audio , December 2010 , pp. 239 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amatriain, X., Höllerer, T., Kuchera-Morin, J., Pope, S. 2007. Immersive Audio and Music in the Allosphere. International Computer Music Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ann Arbor, MI: Scholarly Publishing Office, University of Michigan: 276–283.Google Scholar
Fitz, K., Haken, L., Lefvert, S., O’Donnell, M. 2002. Sound Morphing Using Loris and the Reassigned Bandwdith-Enhanced Additive Sound Model: Practice and Applications. Computer Music Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden. Ann Arbor, MI: Scholarly Publishing Office, University of Michigan: 393–400.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. 1988. Space and the BEAST Concert Diffusion System. In Francis Dhomont (ed.), L’espace du son. Ohain, Belgium: Musiques et Recherches.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. 1998. Sound, Space, Sculpture: Some Thoughts on the ‘What’, ‘How’ and ‘Why’of Sound Diffusion. Organised Sound 3(2): 177–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. 2000. Diffusion: Theories and Practices, with Particular Reference to the BEAST System. eContact 2.4 on the website of the Canadian Electroacoustic Community/Communauté électroacoustique canadienne: http://cec.concordia.ca/econtact/Diffusion/diffindex.htm.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. 2004. Rock’n’Roll. On Environs, IMED0788, empreintes DIGITALes, Montreal, QC, 2007.Google Scholar
Kendall, G. 1995. The Decorrelation of Audio Signals and its Impact on Spatial Imagery. Computer Music Journal 19(4): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, G., Peters, N., Geier, M., Telekom, D., Berlin, G. 2008. Towards an Interchange Format for Spatial Audio Scenes. Proceedings of the 2008 International Computer Music Conference, Belfast, UK. Ann Arbor, MI: Scholarly Publishing Office, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Pulkki, V. 2001. Spatial Sound Generation and Perception by Amplitude Panning Techniques. ScD dissertation, Sibelius Academy, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Pulkki, V. 2007. Applications of Directional Audio Coding in Audio. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Acoustics, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, C., Goßmann, J., Brümmer, L. 2006. The ZKM Klangdom. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Paris: IRCAM: 140–143.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. 1987. Flocks, Herds and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Sound-Shapes. Organised Sound 2(2): 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topper, D., Burtner, M., Serafin, S. 2002. Spatio-Operational Spectral (SOS) Synthesis. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-02), Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Torchia, R., Lippe, C. 2004. Techniques for Multi-Channel Real-Time Spatial Distribution Using Frequency-Domain Processing. Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME04), Hamamatsu, Japan: 116–19.Google Scholar
Verfaille, V., Arfib, D. 2001. A-DAFx: Adaptive Digital Audio Effects. Proceedings of the COST G-6 Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFX-01), Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. 2008. Spatial Swarm Granulation. Proceedings of the 2008 International Computer Music Conference, Belfast, UK: 1–4.Google Scholar