Oryx

Methods and tools

The revised IUCN protected area management categories: the debate and ways forward

Nigel Dudleya1 p1 c1, Jeffrey D. Parrisha2, Kent H. Redforda3 and Sue Stoltona1

a1 Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Cumberland Road, Spike Island, Bristol, BS1 6UQ, UK

a2 Freedom to Roam, Denver, USA

a3 Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA

Abstract

The global protected area estate is the world’s largest ever planned land use. Protected areas are not monolithic and vary in their purpose, designation, management and outcomes. The IUCN protected area category system is a typology based on management objectives. It documents protected area types and is increasingly used in laws, policy and planning. As its role grows, the category system must be reactive to opinions and open to modifications. In response to requests from members IUCN undertook a 4-year consultation and recently published revised guidelines for the categories. These made subtle but important changes to the protected area definition, giving greater emphasis to nature conservation, protection over the long term and management effectiveness. It refined some categories and gave principles for application. Debates during revision were intense and highlighted many of the issues and challenges surrounding protected areas in the early 21st century. There was a consensus on many issues including the suitability of different governance models (such as indigenous and community conserved areas), sacred natural sites, moving the emphasis of Category IV from habitat manipulation towards species and habitat protection, and recognition of legally defined zones within a protected area as different categories. However, there was considerable disagreement about the definition of a protected area, the appropriateness of some categories with extensive human use, the possibility of linking category classification with biodiversity outcomes, and recognition of territories of indigenous peoples. We map these debates and propose actions to resolve these issues: a necessary step if the world’s protected area network is to be representative, secure and well managed.

(Received June 26 2009)

(Reviewed September 07 2009)

(Accepted March 26 2010)

Correspondence:

c1 Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays, Cumberland Road, Spike Island, Bristol, BS1 6UQ, UK. E-mail nigel@equilibriumresearch.com

p1 Also at: University of Queensland (Industry Fellow), Brisbane St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Metrics
0Comments