Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:01:48.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

James Higginbotham, Tense, aspect, and indexicality (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 26). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xiv+257.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2010

EunHee Lee*
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo
*
Author's address:Linguistics Department, University at Buffalo, 609 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260, USAehlee@buffalo.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abusch, Dorit. 1994. Sequence of tense revisited: Two semantic accounts of tense in intensional contexts. In Kamp, Hans (ed.), Ellipsis, tense, and questions, 87139. DYANA deliverable, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1990. Anaphora and attitude de se. In Bartsch, Renate, Benthem, Johan van & van Emde Boas, Peter (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 131. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Rescher, Nicholas (ed.), The logic of decision and action, 8195. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred. 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics 1.1, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1974. Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, edited by Richmond H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 1995. Tense, attitudes, and scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim von. 1995. On the proper treatment of tense. Semantics and Linguistics Theory (SALT) V, 362386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar