Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T04:38:03.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire administered to pregnant women in Belfast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2010

S. Dhamija
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
A. J. Hill
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
V. Cairnduff
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
J. Bronte
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
A. McKillop
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
M. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Nursing Research Institute, School of Nursing, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK
C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's UniversityBelfast BT12 6BJ, UK
D. R. McCance
Affiliation:
Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Hospitals, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BW, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Maternal nutritional intake is a key determinant of various aspects of pregnancy such as healthy development of the fetus and the mother's own glycemic control. Increased maternal plasma glucose (gestational diabetes) is correlated with the incidence of macrosomia. Recently, the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes(1) study has most clearly shown that adverse outcomes, such as increased birth weight, occur at levels of hyperglycemia less severe than the criteria currently used to diagnose gestational diabetes. This means that maintenance of normal glycemic control in pregnancy is even more important than previously thought. To study the impact of maternal nutrient intake on maternal glycemic control and outcomes of pregnancy, it is important to first, quantify nutrient intake in pregnancy using a validated tool. As part of our larger study, we aim to examine nutrient intake of pregnant women in Belfast and study the impact of this on the outcome of their pregnancy. However, first, we aim to validate our test method, a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), so that we can proceed with confidence. For this validation process, we aim to use the 7-d food diary (FD) as a reference method, the known gold standard for measuring nutritional intake.

The FFQ used within this research has been adapted from one used within the Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood(Reference Rogers and Emmett2). Data from the FFQ was entered into NETWSIP; data from the FD was entered into Q Builder (nutritional analysis software). n 40 women completed an FFQ and FD. Data from the FFQ was entered into NETWSIP; data from the FD was entered into Q Builder (nutritional analysis software). Means, sd, correlation, bias and limits of agreement(Reference Bland and Altman3) were calculated using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

From the FFQ, mean (sd) energy was 1888 (401) kcal and carbohydrate 271 (61) g. From FD, corresponding results were 2129 (463) kcal and 262 (64) g, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients between the two methods were 0.63 (energy) and 0.93 (carbohydrate). Bias and limits of agreement were 240 (−374 to 856) kcal for energy and 20 (−49 to 31) g for carbohydrate. Percentage (Cohen's kappa) of women categorized into the same or adjacent fifth of the FD distribution was 75% (0.48) for energy and 95% (0.90) for carbohydrate.

The FFQ estimates energy and protein intake adequately. It underestimates fat intake and overestimates carbohydrate intake. This is expected, given that the FFQ is reporting usual intake and the FD is reporting actual intake. For nutritional coefficients affecting carbohydrate metabolism (energy, carbohydrate, fibre, starch, sugars and vitamin E), the FFQ is a satisfactory tool for estimating usual intake.

In light of these findings, we can confidently proceed with examining nutrient intake in pregnant women, using the test FFQ, to determine the influence of nutrient intake on the outcome of their pregnancy.

** Significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed); *significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

References

1.The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group (2008). Hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes of pregnancy. N Engl J 358, 19912002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Rogers, I, Emmett, P, ALSPAC Study Team (1998). Diet during pregnancy in a population of pregnant women in South West England. ALSPAC study team. Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 246250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bland, JM, Altman, DG (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1, 307310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

**