Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T19:28:47.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Farm-level benefits to investments for mitigating land degradation: empirical evidence from Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2001

Bekele Shiferaw
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, PO Box 5033, 1432 Ås, Norway.
Stein T. Holden
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, PO Box 5033, 1432 Ås, Norway.

Abstract

Resource conservation programs have often been launched without careful evaluation of farmers' intertemporal tradeoffs in undertaking conservation investments. Such investments often have long pay back periods and reduce short-term household incomes. The critical question is whether long-term benefits would be sufficient to compensate farmers' immediate costs. Lack of empirical data on crop responses to soil erosion has hindered policy-relevant research. This study uses empirical data from the Ethiopian highlands to estimate the damage from soil erosion and evaluate the profitability of proposed conservation investments. A farm-level model is developed to study economic incentives to implement proposed conservation methods. Results show that incentives to invest in conservation practices are very low except for low cost methods like grass strips. The yield penalty due to area loss and high investment costs contribute to this. Policies focusing on minimizing the area loss effect and subsidizing the initial investment costs are shown to improve farmers' incentives to conserve the soil. A preferred policy option in the short-term is supporting low cost technologies that provide short-term benefits to poor farmers.

Type
Policy Options
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to the Soil Conservation Research Project for providing us with the biophysical data used in this study and to the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) for its support during the fieldwork. The Research Council of Norway and the EU provided funds for the project. We have benefited from valuable comments by three anonymous reviewers. The usual disclaimers apply. The first author claims senior authorship (E-mail:bekele.shiferaw@ios.nlh.no).