Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:55:51.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Medical Student Attitudes about Bioethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2010

CHERYL C. MACPHERSON  and
ROBERT M. VEATCH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professionalism is demonstrated through attitudes and behaviors. Medical education is concerned with teaching and evaluating it among students. It is often bioethicists who teach professionalism to medical students. Most bioethics curricula use lectures and group discussions to introduce principles and theories, but there is variation in number of credit and contact hours, placement in the curriculum (which year(s) and alongside which courses bioethics is placed), the extent of individual mentoring, and the emphasis placed on any particular philosophical approach. Bioethics curricula also vary in whether and how explicitly and extensively they address topics, including professionalism, cultural competence, medical humanities, spirituality, death and dying, and community service, and in the number and topics of vignettes, controversies, assignments, and course activities.

Type
Special Section: Bioethics Education
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 488 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Macpherson, C, Kenny, N. Professionalism and the basic sciences: An untapped resource. Medical Education 2008;42:183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Williams, JR. Medical Ethics Manual. Ferney-Voltaire Cedex, France: Ethics Unit of the World Medical Association; 2005:36,61. Available at http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/30ethicsmanual/pdf/ethics_manual_en.pdf (accessed March 15, 2010).Google Scholar

3. Gross, ML. Ethics education and physician morality. Social Science & Medicine 1999;49:329–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

4. See note 3, Gross 1999.

5. See note 3, Gross 1999.

6. Hellsten, SK. Global bioethics: Utopia or reality? Developing World Bioethics 2008;8:70–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Akabayashi, A, Kodama, S, Slingsby, BT. Is Asian bioethics really the solution? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2008;17:270–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8. Baldwin, DC, Daugherty, SR, Rowley, BD, Schwarz, MR. Cheating in medical school: A survey of second-year students at 31 schools. Academic Medicine 1996;71:267–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9. Myser, C, Kerridge, IH, Mitchell, K. Teaching clinical ethics as a professional skill: Bridging the gap between knowledge about ethics and its use in clinical practice. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995;21:97–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

10. Self, DJ, Baldwin, DC. Does medical education inhibit the development of moral reasoning in medical students? A cross-sectional study. Academic Medicine 1998;73:S91–S93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Self, DJ, Wolinsky, FD, Baldwin, DC. The effect of teaching medical ethics on medical students’ moral reasoning. Academic Medicine 1989;64:755–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. See note 3, Gross 1999.

12. Malek, JI, Geller, G, Sugarman, J. Talking about cases in bioethics: The effect of an intensive course on health care professionals. Journal of Medical Ethics 2000;26:131–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

13. See note 9, Self, Baldwin 1998.

14. Callahan, D. Goals of teaching ethics. In: Callahan, D, Bok, S, eds. Ethics Teaching in Higher Education. New York: Plenum Press; 1980:61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar