Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:45:16.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excavations at Bigberry, near Canterbury 1978–80

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

F. H. Thompson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Excavations at the Iron Age hillfort of Bigberry, Kent, in 1978–80 had the object of a fresh appraisal since the excavations of 1933–4 of a site customarily regarded as the first obstacle encountered by Caesar after his second landing in Britain in 54 B.C. The main defences and those of the annexe were sectioned, and a hitherto unrecorded cross-dyke also. Various magnetic anomalies located by a geophysical survey were investigated and gave evidence of internal occupation and structures. It is suggested that there was a settlement preceding the hillfort, with the cross-dyke as a possible second phase; the hillfort may have been built in the second century B.C. by newcomers from Gaul, and after Caesar's passage through Kent the occupants moved down into the valley of the Stour to the site of Canterbury, though the precise point in the second half of the first century B.C. remains uncertain.

The opportunity has been taken of a simple but complete republication of the nineteenth-century discoveries of the metalwork from the site now dispersed among museums at Canterbury, Maidstone and Manchester. It is suggested that this material represents the abandoned possessions of the inhabitants and varied aspects of their life, and industrial or ritual explanations are discounted.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 237 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Guide, B.M., 1953. Brailsford, J. W., Later Prehistoric Antiquities in the British Isles (London).Google Scholar
Blockley, K. and , P., 1981. ‘Interim report on excavations in 1981 by the Canterbury Archaeological Trust, 5. Bigbury Camp’, Arch. Cant, xcviii, 287–92.Google Scholar
Boyd Dawkins, W., 1902. ‘On Bigbury Camp and the Pilgrims' Way’, Arch.J. lix, 211–18.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 1978. The Prehistoric Settlement of Britain (London).Google Scholar
C.B.A. Council for British Archaeology.Google Scholar
Champion, T. C., 1976. The Earlier Iron Age in the Region of the Lower Thames: Insular and External Factors (University of Oxford D.Phil, thesis).Google Scholar
Clark, A. J., 1979. ‘Archaeomagnetic dating’ in Thompson, 1979, 309–11.Google Scholar
Clark, A. J. 1980. ‘Magnetic dating’, in Sx.A.C. cxviii, 7–12.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W., 1976. ‘The origins of urbanisation in Britain’, in Cunliffe, B. and Rowley, T. (eds.), Oppida in Barbarian Europe (B.A.R. Supp. Series 11).Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W., 1978a. Iron Age Communities in Britain (2nd edn., London).Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W., 1978b. ‘Settlement and population in the British Iron Age: some facts, figures and fantasies’, in Cunliffe, B. and Rowley, T. (eds.), Lowland Iron Age Communities in Europe (B.A.R. Supp. Series 48), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W., 1981. ‘Danebury, Hampshire. Third interim report on the excavations 1976–80’, A.J. lxi, 238–54.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W., 1982. ‘Social and economic development in Kent in the pre-Roman Iron Age’, in Leach, P. E. (ed.), Archaeology in Kent to A.D. 1500 (C.B.A. Research Report 48), pp. 40–50.Google Scholar
Déchelette, J., 1913. La Collection Millon: antiquités préhistoriques et gallo-romaines (Paris).Google Scholar
Fox, , Sir Cyril, 1946. A Find of the Early Iron Age from Llyn Cerrig Bach, Anglesey (Cardiff).Google Scholar
Frere, Sheppard, 1954. ‘Canterbury excavations, summer, 1946’, Arch. Cant, lxviii, 101–43.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C., 1977. ‘Britain and Julius Caesar’, Proc. British Academy, lxiii, 125–92 (Mortimer Wheeler Archaeological Lecture, 1975).Google Scholar
Hesnard, A., 1980. ‘Un dépôt augusteén d'amphores à La Longorina, Ostie’, in D'Arms, J. H. and Kopff, E. C. (eds.), The Seaborne Commerce of Ancient Rome: Studies in Archaeology and History (Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, xxxvi), pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
Hogg, A. H. A., 1975. Hill-forts of Britain (London).Google Scholar
Holmes, T. Rice, 1907. Ancient Britain and the Invasions of Julius Caesar (Oxford).Google Scholar
Jackson, K. H., 1964. The Oldest Irish Tradition: a Window on the Iron Age (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Jessup, R. F., 1933. ‘Bigberry Camp, Harbledown, Kent’, Arch. J. lxxxix, 87–115.Google Scholar
Jessup, R. F., 1938. ‘Objects from Bigberry Camp, Harbledown, Kent’, A.J. xviii, 174–6.Google Scholar
Jessup, R. F., and Cook, N. C., 1936. ‘Excavations at Bigberry Camp, Harbledown’, Arch. Cant. xlviii, 151–68.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. B., 1971. ‘Quarry Wood Camp, Loose: a Belgic oppidum,’ in Arch. Cant, lxxxv, 55–84.Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, H., 1968. ‘Théorie de l'esclavage’ in Finley, M. I. (ed.), Slavery in Classical Antiquity (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Manning, W. H., 1983. ‘The cauldron chains of Iron Age and Roman Britain’, in Hartley, B. and Wacher, J. (eds.), Rome and her Northern Provinces (Gloucester), pp. 132–54.Google Scholar
Payne, F. G., 1947. ‘The plough in ancient Britain’, Arch. J. civ, 82–111.Google Scholar
Peacock, D. P. S., 1971. ‘Roman amphorae in pre-Roman Britain’, in Jesson, M. and Hill, D. (eds.), The Iron Age and its Hill-forts (Southampton), pp. 161–88.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1955. ‘Three metal-work hoards of the Roman period from southern Scotland’, P.S.A.S. lxxxvii, 1–50.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1971. ‘Firedogs in Iron Age Britain and beyond’, in Boardman, J.et al. (eds.), The European Community in Later Prehistory (London).Google Scholar
P.P.S. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.Google Scholar
P.S.A.L. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London.Google Scholar
P.S.A.S. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.Google Scholar
Rodwell, W., 1976. ‘Coinage, oppida and the rise of Belgic power in south-eastern Britain’, in Cunliffe, B. and Rowley, T. (eds.), Oppida in Barbarian Europe (B.A.R. Supp. Series 11), pp. 181–367.Google Scholar
Stead, I. M., 1967. ‘A La Tène III burial at Welwyn Garden City’, Archaeologia, ci, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sx.A.C. Sussex Archaeological Collections.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. A., 1965. The Early Germans (Oxford).Google Scholar
Thompson, F. H., 1979. ‘Three Surrey hillforts: excavations at Anstiebury, Holmbury and Hascombe, 1972–1977’, A.J. lix, 245–318.Google Scholar
Thompson, I., 1982. Grog-tempered ‘Belgic’ Pottery of South-eastern England (B.A.R. 108).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylecote, R. F., 1961. ‘The Roman anvil from Sutton Walls, Herefordshire’, in Trans. Woolhope Naturalists’ Field Club, xxxvii (1961–3), 56–61.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, J. B., 1939. ‘Iron Age metal horses' bits of the British Isles’, P.P.S. v, 173–92.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, J. B., 1941. ‘Two early linch-pins, from Kings Langley, Herts., and from Tiddington, Stratford-on-Avon’, A.J. xx, 358–67.Google Scholar
Williams, D. F., 1981. ‘The Roman amphora trade with Late Iron Age Britain’, in Howard, H. and Morris, E. L. (eds.), Production and Distribution: a Ceramic Viewpoint (B.A.R. Int. Series, 120), pp. 123–32.Google Scholar
Zevi, F., 1966. ‘Appunti sulle anfore romane’, in Archeologia Classica, xviii, 208–47.Google Scholar