¹ Mazzoleni, Gianpietro and Schulz, Winfried, ‘ “Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy’, Political Communication, 16 (1999), 247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mathias, Hans Kepplinger, , ‘Mediatization of Politics: Theory and Data’, Journal of Communication, 52 (2002), 972–986Google Scholar; Blumler, Jay G. and Kavangh, Dennis, ‘The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features’, Political Communication, 16 (1999), 209–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schudson, Michael, ‘The News Media as Political Institution’, Annual Review of Political Science, 5 (2002), 249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

² Newton, Kenneth, ‘May the Weak Forces Be With You: The Power of the Mass Media in Modern Politics’, European Journal of Political Research, 45 (2006), 209–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³ Newton, , ‘May the Weak Forces Be With You’Google Scholar.

⁴ Behr, Roy and Iyengar, Shanto, ‘Television News, Real World Cues, and Changes in the Public Opinion’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 49 (1985), 38–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y., The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McCombs, Maxwell, Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion (Cambridge: Polity, 2004)Google Scholar.

⁵ Walgrave, Stefaan and van Aelst, Peter, ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power: Towards a Preliminary Theory’, Journal of Communication, 56 (2006), 88–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶ Walgrave, and Aelst, van, ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’Google Scholar.

⁷ Walgrave, and Aelst, van, ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’, p. 104Google Scholar.

⁸ Petrocik, John, ‘Issue-Ownership in Presidential Elections with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40 (1996), 825–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹ Cf. Soroka, Stuart, Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Walgrave, and Aelst, van, ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’Google Scholar.

¹⁰ Kriesi, Hanspeter, ‘Political Mobilization, Political Participation and the Power of the Vote’, West European Politics, 31 (2008), 147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹¹ Carmines, Edward G., ‘The Logic of Party Alignments’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3 (1991), 65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹² Kleinnijenhuis, Jan and Rietberg, Ewald M., ‘Parties, Media, the Public and the Economy: Patterns of Societal Agenda-Setting’, European Journal of Political Research, 28 (1995), 95–118Google Scholar.

¹³ Cook, Timothy E., Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Cf. Bennett, W. Lance, ‘Toward a Theory of Press–State Relations in the US’, Journal of Communication, 40 (1990), 103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁵ Flemming, Roy B., Wood, B. Dan and Bohte, John, ‘Attention to Issues in a System of Separated Powers: The Macrodynamics of American Policy Agendas’, Journal of Politics, 61 (1999), 76–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brandenburg, Heinz, ‘Who Follows Whom? The Impact of Parties on the Media Agenda Formation in the 1997 British Election Campaign’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7 (2002), 34–54Google Scholar; Kleinnijenhuis, and Rietberg, , ‘Parties, Media, the Public and the Economy’Google Scholar.

¹⁶ Soroka, , Agenda-Setting Dynamics in CanadaGoogle Scholar; Wood, B. Dan and Peake, Jeffrey S., ‘The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting’, American Political Science Review, 92 (1998), 173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walgrave, Stefaan, Soroka, Stuart and Nuytemans, Michiel, ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’, Comparative Political Studies, 41 (2008), 814–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁷ van Noije, Lonneke, Kleinniejnhuis, Jan and Oegma, Dirk, ‘Loss of Parliamentary Control due to Mediatization and Internationalization’, British Journal of Political Science, 38 (2008), 455–478Google Scholar.

¹⁸ Walgrave, and van Aelst, , ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’Google Scholar.

¹⁹ Walgrave, , Soroka, and Nuytemans, , ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar; Bartels, Larry, ‘Politicians and the Press; Who Leads Whom?’ (paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, 1996)Google Scholar.

²⁰ Soroka, , Agenda-Setting Dynamics in CanadaGoogle Scholar; Edwards, George C. and Wood, B. Dan, ‘Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media’, American Political Science Review, 93 (1999), 327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walgrave, , Soroka, and Nuytemans, , ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

²¹ Zucker, Harold G., ‘The Variable Nature of News Media Influence’, in B. D. Ruben, ed., Communication Yearbook, Vol. 2 (New Brunswick, Conn.: Transaction Books, 1978), pp. 225–240Google Scholar.

²² Soroka, , Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada. Cf. also Walgrave et al., ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

²³ Soroka, , Agenda-Setting Dynamics in CanadaGoogle Scholar.

²⁴ Walgrave, et al. , ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

²⁵ Walgrave, and van Aelst, , ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’, pp. 95–98Google Scholar.

²⁶ Walgrave, and van Aelst, , ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’, p. 103Google Scholar.

²⁷ Walgrave, et al. , ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

²⁸ E.g. Mortensen, Peter B. and Serritzlew, Søren, ‘Newspapers and Budgeting: The Effects of Media Coverage on Local Expenditure Decisions’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 29 (2006), 236–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁹ Walgrave, and van Aelst, , ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’Google Scholar.

³⁰ Walgrave, and van Aelst, , ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’, pp. 98–101Google Scholar.

³¹ Carmines, , ‘The Logic of Party Alignments’Google Scholar.

³² Budge, Ian and Farlie, Dennis, ‘Party Competition – Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data’, in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair, eds, West European Party System:Continuity and Change (London: Sage Publications, 1983), pp. 267–305Google Scholar.

³³ Carmines, , ‘The Logic of Party Alignments’, p. 75Google Scholar.

³⁴ Petrocik, , ‘Issue-Ownership in Presidential Elections with a 1980 Case Study’Google Scholar; Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald, News that Matters: Television and American Opinion (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Walgrave, Stefaan and de Swert, Knut, ‘Where does Issue Ownership Come From? From Party or from the Media? Issue-Party Identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12 (2007), 37–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁵ Sides, John, ‘The Origin of Campaign Agendas’, British Journal of Political Science, 36 (2006), 407–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁶ Cf. Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Stubager, Rune, Coding of Danish Radio News 1984–2003 (Aarhus: Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus, 2007)Google Scholar.

³⁷ Walgrave, et al. , ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

³⁸ Lund, Anker B., Den redigerende magt (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press 2002)Google Scholar.

³⁹ Cf. Green-Pedersen, and Stubager, , Coding of Danish Radio News 1984–2003Google Scholar.

⁴⁰ The Danish radio news contains a huge number of features that simply report the ‘state of the world’, i.e. a civil war or an election in another country, with no relation to Danish politics. Such features have therefore not been included in the analysis. It includes events in other countries with relevance to Denmark, however, such as events in countries with Danish peacekeeping troops (cf. Green-Pedersen, and Stubager, , Coding of Danish Radio News 1984–2003Google Scholar).

⁴¹ According to the statutes of the Danish parliament, the answer should be provided within a maximum of six working days after the question was tabled (cf. www.ft.dk).

⁴² Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, ‘Bringing Parties into Parliament: The Development of Parliamentary Activities in Western Europe’, Party Politics (forthcoming)Google Scholar.

⁴³ www.agendasetting.dk.

⁴⁴ www.policyagendas.org; cf. also Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D. and Wilkerson, John, ‘Studying Policy Dynamics’, in Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones, eds, Policy Dynamics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001), pp. 29–46Google Scholar.

⁴⁵ Soroka, , Agenda-Setting Dynamics in CanadaGoogle Scholar.

⁴⁶ Walgrave, et al. , ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

⁴⁷ Greenland and the Faroe Islands are former Danish colonies that now enjoy some measure of sovereignty. The reason for including them in ‘foreign affairs’ is that media attention concerning Greenland in particular is often related to the US bases there and is thus related to defence and foreign policy.

⁴⁸ Walgrave, et al. ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

⁴⁹ Granger, Clive, ‘Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods’, Econometrica, 37 (1969), 424–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁰ As is well known, when working with time series data it is essential to ensure that any results obtained are not driven by non-stationarity in the data. Since we expect to observe structural shifts in our data due to the political conditionality of media effects, we have opted to use the Phillips–Perron stationarity test, which explicitly takes this possibility into account. The test indicates that all of our series are stationary. See Enders, Walter, Applied Econometric Time Series (Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2004)Google Scholar.

⁵¹ For questions, the assignment to weeks was based on the date for the answers to the questions.

⁵² In a few instances, a new government was not formed by the end of the two-week period. In these cases, the dummy variable singles out all weeks until the new government is formed.

⁵³ McCombs, , Setting the Agenda, pp. 43–48Google Scholar.

⁵⁴ Given that the date used for questions is the date they were answered, a one-week lag constitutes an almost immediate effect.

⁵⁵ Cf. Beck, N. and Katz, J., ‘What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-series–Cross-section Data in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review, 89 (1995), 634–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁶ The choice of this specification over the more prevalent random effects model is based on two premises. First, at the theoretical level, the assumption behind the random effects model that the issue groups included in the model (i.e. the panels in the statistical model) can be considered as a random draw from a much larger population of issues (cf. Kennedy, Peter, A Guide to Econometrics, 5th edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003))Google Scholar seems insupportable. Indeed, the issue groups are seen as encompassing almost all issues of relevance in this context. Secondly, the fixed-effects model is supported at the empirical level, where a Hausman test (cf. Hausman, J. A., ‘Specification Tests in Econometrics’, Econometrica, 46 (1978), 1251–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar) indicated a vastly superior fit for this specification.

⁵⁷ Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, ‘Long-term Changes in Danish Party Politics? From Class Competition to Issue Competition’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 29 (2006), 221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁸ Goul Andersen, Jørgen, ‘Partiernes image: De borgerlige bedst til at sikre velfærden’, in Jørgen G. Andersen and Ole Borre, eds, Politisk Forandring (Aarhus: Systime, 2003), pp. 151–170Google Scholar.

⁵⁹ Green-Pedersen, , ‘Bringing Parties into Parliament’Google Scholar.

⁶⁰ Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Thomsen, Lisbeth H., ‘Bloc Politics vs. Broad Cooperation: The Functioning of Danish Minority Parliamentarism’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 11 (2005), 153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The 2001–03 period, with a right-of-centre government, has been omitted from the analysis because of the short time series.

⁶¹ Bartels, , ‘Politicians and the Press’; Wood and Peake, ‘The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting’Google Scholar.

⁶² Cf. Kennedy, , A Guide to EconometricsGoogle Scholar. This procedure also minimizes the risk of autocorrelation in the residuals of the estimated models, see Brandt, Patrick T. and Williams, John T., Multiple Time Series Models (Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶³ For the application of a similar procedure based on F-tests, see Wood, and Peake, , ‘The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting’Google Scholar.

⁶⁴ Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, ‘Minority Governments and Party Politics: The Political and Institutional Background to the “Danish miracle” ’, Journal of Public Policy, 21 (2001), 53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶⁵ This last effect is probably due to a keen interest displayed by the right-of-centre opposition in contracting out public services and in the related topic of the efficiency of the public sector in general (see below for a discussion of the results for foreign affairs).

⁶⁶ Newton, , ‘May the Weak Forces Be With You’Google Scholar.

⁶⁷ Walgrave, et al. ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’, p. 820Google Scholar.

⁶⁸ Cf. Wood, and Peake, , ‘The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Agenda Setting’Google Scholar; Edwards, and Wood, , ‘Who Influences Whom?’Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Andersen, Mikael S. and Hansen, Michael W., Vandmiljøplanen. Fra handling til symbol (Harlev: Niche, 1991)Google Scholar.

⁷⁰ Andersen, and Hansen, , VandmiljøplanenGoogle Scholar.

⁷¹ Laursen, Søren, Vold på dagsordenen. Medierne og den politiske proces (Aarhus: The Danish Power and Democracy Study, 2001)Google Scholar.

⁷² Walgrave, and van Aelst, , ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda Setting Power’; Walgrave et al., ‘The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-Setting Power’Google Scholar.

⁷³ Cf. Flemming, , Wood, and Bohte, , ‘Attention to Issues in a System of Separated Powers’Google Scholar; Edwards, and Wood, , ‘Who Influences Whom?’; Bartels, Politicians and the PressGoogle Scholar.

⁷⁴ Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo, Comparing Media Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷⁵ Mair, Peter, ‘The Challenge to Party Government’, West European Politics, 31 (2008), 211–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷⁶ Cf. Kriesi, , ‘Political Mobilization, Political Participation and the Power of the Vote’Google Scholar.

⁷⁷ Newton, , ‘May the Weak Forces Be With You’Google Scholar.