Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:30:27.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual atomism rethought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2010

Susan Schneider
Susan Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6304. susansdr@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Focusing on Machery's claim that concepts play entirely different roles in philosophy and psychology, I explain how one well-known philosophical theory of concepts, Conceptual Atomism (CA), when properly understood, takes into account both kinds of roles.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 224 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fodor, J. A. (1998) Concepts, Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (2008) LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1989) Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. (2002) Radical concept nativism. Cognition 86:25–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E. (2009) Doing without concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, E. & Laurence, S., eds. (1999) Concepts: Core readings. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. (2002) Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S. (2009) The nature of symbols in the language of thought. Mind and Language 24(4):523–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S. (forthcoming) The language of thought: New philosophical directions. MIT Press.Google Scholar