Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:18:44.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The faux, fake, forged, false, fabricated, and phony: Problems for the independence of similarity-based theories of concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2010

Anne J. Jacobson
Anne J. Jacobson
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-3004. ajjacobson@uh.eduhttp://www.class.uh.edu/phil/jacobson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some things in our environment are not what they seem, and they provide a challenge to theories of concepts that emphasize similarity. Section 1 of my commentary explores a dilemma this situation creates for Machery. Section 2 describes a more general problem for prototype and exemplar theories. Section 3 locates a place for similarity-based concepts, and indicates an alternative to Machery's thesis.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 215
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carey, S. & F., Xu (2001) Infants'knowledge of objects: Beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition 80 (1–2):179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, J. J., Nedbal, M. A., Dragoo, J. W. & Honeycutt, R. L. (2000) Whence the red panda? Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17(2):190–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E. (2009) Doing without concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L. (2002) The big book of concepts. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öğmen, H. (2007) A theory of moving form perception: Synergy between masking, perceptual grouping, and motion computation in retinotopic and non-retinotopic representations. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 3 (1–2):67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öğmen, H., Otto, T. U. & Herzog, M. H. (2006) Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision. Vision Research 46(19):3234–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, J. J., Wolsan, M., Minami, S., Hosoda, T., Sinaga, M. H., Hiyama, K., Yamaguchi, Y. & Suzuki, H. (2009) Deciphering and dating the red panda's ancestry and early adaptive radiation of Musteloidea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53(3):907–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed