Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:17:30.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stadium in your bedroom: functional staging, authenticity and the audience-led aesthetic in record production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2010

Simon Zagorski-Thomas
Simon Zagorski-Thomas
Affiliation:
London College of Music, Thames Valley University, St Mary's Road, London W5 5RF, UK E-mail: simon.zagorski-thomas@tvu.ac
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article will discuss how two major contributing factors, functional staging and perceived authenticity, have had and continue to have a powerful influence on the sound of record production across geographical boundaries and throughout history. Functional staging is a concept building on the idea of phonographic staging developed by William Moylan and Serge Lacasse and related to Allan Moore's ‘sound-box’. The staging of sounds in the record production process is considered to be functional if the reason for their particular placement or treatment is related to the practicalities of audience reception rather than to aesthetics. It is not a question of whether the music has a function or not but whether that function has influenced the staging of the recorded music. Thus the divergence of staging techniques used in dance music and rock music that began in the 1970s can be seen as resulting from the different functions the music was put to by the different audiences. Music that is played back through large speakers in a club for the purpose of dancing needs to maintain the clarity of the rhythmic elements and so the ‘drier’ techniques of drum and percussive instrument mixing that characterise dance music developed. Rock, however, was more frequently played back in the smaller, less ambient, home environment and so reverberation was added to simulate the atmosphere of the large-scale venue. At the same time, a variety of culturally constructed notions of authenticity have developed within different musical audiences. Why is it that Queen felt the need to inscribe ‘no synthesisers were used in the making of this album’ on their early records and yet Brian May felt entirely comfortable constructing multiple layered performance ‘patchworks’ of guitar tracks? Why might the use of one type of technological mediation be considered more or less authentic than another? Using examples taken from recordings from all around the world and from ‘art’ and ‘popular’ forms of music, this article will explore how audience-led cultural trends in recording and production practice have resulted in the particular ‘sounds’ of different recorded music genres.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 251 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Born, G. 2005. ‘On musical mediation: ontology, technology and creativity’, Twentieth-Century Music, 2/1, pp. 7–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breivik, K.T. 2002. Interview with Steve Albini. http://www.lunakafe.com/moon73/usil73.php (accessed 13 May 2009)Google Scholar
Brøvig Andersen, R. 2006. ‘Opaque mediation as part of the composition – a study of Portishead's music’. Paper presented at the Rhythm, Sound and Technology in Computer-Based, Groove-Oriented Music Research Workshop at the University of Oslo, October 2006Google Scholar
Clapton, E. 2008. Eric Clapton: The Autobiography (London, Arrow Books)Google Scholar
Clarke, E.F. 1999. ‘Subject-position and the specification of invariants in music by Frank Zappa and P.J. Harvey’, Music Analysis, 18, pp. 347–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, E.F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning (New York, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Cogan, J. and Clark, W. 2003. Temples of Sound: Inside the Great Recording Studios (San Francisco, Chronicle Books)Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1999. ‘Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity’, In Handbook of Creativity, ed. Sternberg, R. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. 1995. ‘Interview with Roy Thomas Baker & Gary Langan: the making of Queen's “Bohemian Rhapsody”’. Sound on Sound, October 1995. http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1995_articles/oct95/queen.html (accessed 13 May 2009)Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. 1996. Good Vibrations: a History of Record Production (London, Sanctuary)Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene (Oxford, Oxford Paperbacks)Google Scholar
Dibben, N. 2006. ‘Subjectivity and the construction of emotion in the music of Björk’. Music Analysis, 25/1–2, pp. 171–97Google Scholar
Feldman, J. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: a Neural Theory of Language (Cambridge, MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goehr, L. 1992 [2007]. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: an Essay in the Philosophy of Music (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Goldberg, M. 1997. ‘For Portishead it's always sour times: interview with Geoff Barrow’. Addicted To Noise. http://kotinetti.suomi.net/heikki.hietala/Interviews/Geoff%20Addicted%202.htm (accessed 22 November 2007)Google Scholar
Hjort, C. 2007. Strange Brew: Eric Clapton and the British Blues Boom 1965–1970 (London: Jawbone Press)Google Scholar
Keightley, K. 1996. ‘“Turn it down!” she shrieked: gender, domestic space, and high fidelity, 1948–59’. Popular Music, 15/2, pp. 149–77Google Scholar
Kehew, B. and Ryan, K. 2006. Recording The Beatles (Houston, Texas: Curve Bender)Google Scholar
Kvifte, T. 2007. ‘Digital sampling and analogue aesthetics’, In Aesthetics at Work (pp. 105–28) (Oslo, Unipub Forlag)Google Scholar
Lacasse, S. 2000. ‘Listen to my voice’, the evocative power of voice in recorded rock music and other forms of vocal expression. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool. http://www.mus.ulaval.ca/lacasse/texts/THESIS.pdf (accessed 14 April 2010)Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By (Chicago, University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Massey, H. 2000. Behind the Glass – Top Record Producers Tell How They Craft the Hits (San Francisco, Backbeat Books)Google Scholar
McIntyre, P. 2007. ‘Rethinking creativity: record production and the systems model’. Proceedings of the 3rd Art of Record Production Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. http://www.artofrecordproduction.comGoogle Scholar
Moore, A., and Dockwray, R. 2009. ‘Establishment of the virtual performance space in rock’, Twentieth-Century Music, 5/2, pp. 219–41Google Scholar
Moorefield, V. 2005. The Producer as Composer: Shaping the Sounds of Popular Music (Cambridge, MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moylan, W. 2002 [1992]. The Art of Recording: Understanding and Crafting the Mix (Burlington, Focal Press)Google Scholar
Rossing, T., Moore, F., and Wheeler, P. 2002. The Science of Sound (3rd edn) (San Francisco, Addison Wesley)Google Scholar
Souvignier, T. 2003. The World of DJs and the Turntable Culture (Milwaukee, Hal Leonard Publishing)Google Scholar
Stavrou, M. 2003. Mixing With Your Mind (Utah, Flux Research)Google Scholar
Straw, W. 2001. ‘Consumption’, In The Cambridge Companion to Pop and Rock, ed. Frith, S., Straw, W. and Street, J. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Taylor, T. 1997. Global Pop, World Music, World Markets (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Théberge, P. 1989. ‘The “sound” of music: technological rationalisation and the production of popular music’, New Formations, 8, pp. 99–111Google Scholar
Thompson, D. 2006. ‘Cream’: How Eric Clapton Took The World By Storm (London, Virgin Books)Google Scholar
Zagorski-Thomas, S. 2006. ‘Functional staging through the use of production techniques in late 20th century African and Cuban popular music recordings’, Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Art of Record Production Conference, Edinburgh. www.artofrecordproduction.com (accessed 2 August 2008)Google Scholar
Zagorski-Thomas, S. 2008. ‘The medium in the message: phonographic staging techniques that utilize the sonic characteristics of reproduction media’, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Art of Record Production Conference, Lowell, MA, USA. www.artofrecordproduction.com (accessed 2 August 2008)Google Scholar
Zak, A.J. 2001. The Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records (Berkeley and London, University of California Press)Google Scholar

Discography

Age of Love, ‘Age of Love’. Airplay Records, 9252. 12” vinyl single. 1990Google Scholar
The Beach Boys, Pet Sounds. Capitol Records, DT 2458. 12” vinyl LP. 1966Google Scholar
The Beatles, Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. EMI Records, 2J 064-04177. 12” vinyl LP. 1967Google Scholar
The BeeGees, ‘Night Fever’. RSO Records, 2090 272. 7” vinyl single. 1978Google Scholar
Brown, James, ‘Say It Loud I'm Black And I'm Proud’. King Records, 45-6187. 7” vinyl single. 1968Google Scholar
Cara, Irene, ‘Fame’. RSO Records, 2090 450. 7” vinyl single. 1980Google Scholar
Charles, Tina, ‘I Love To Love’. Columbia Records, 3-10288. 7” vinyl single. 1976Google Scholar
Chic, ‘Le Freak’. Atlantic Records, ATL 11 209. 7” vinyl single. 1978Google Scholar
Cooper, Alice, ‘School's Out’. Warner, K16287A. 7” vinyl single. 1972Google Scholar
Cream, Fresh Cream. Reaction Records, 594001. 12” vinyl LP. 1966Google Scholar
The Doors, ‘Light My Fire’. Elektra Records, EK 45615. 7” vinyl single. 1967Google Scholar
Double Exposure, ‘Ten Per Cent’. Salsoul Records, 12D-2008. 12” vinyl single. 1976Google Scholar
Drake, Nick, Bryter Layter. Island Records, ILPS 9134. 12” vinyl LP. 1970Google Scholar
Dylan, Bob, Highway 61 Revisited. CBS Records, BPG 62572. 12” vinyl LP. 1965Google Scholar
Earth, Wind & Fire, ‘Shining Star’. CBS Records, CBS 3137. 7” vinyl single. 1975Google Scholar
Gray, David, White Ladder. RCA Records, 07863 69351-2. CD album. 2000Google Scholar
The Hues Corporation, ‘Rock The Boat’. RCA Victor, APBO-0232. 7” vinyl single. 1974Google Scholar
Indeep, ‘Last Night A DJ Saved My Life’. Sound of New York Records, 0030.618. 7” vinyl single. 1983Google Scholar
K.C. & The Sunshine Band, ‘Get Down Tonight’. RCA, XB 02025. 7” vinyl single. 1975Google Scholar
Matmos, Supreme Balloon. Matador Records, OLE 799-2. CD album. 2008Google Scholar
Morente, Enrique, ‘Venta Zoraida’ on The Rough Guide To Flamenco. World Music Network, B00000B7YM. CD album. 1992Google Scholar
Nirvana, In Utero. Geffen Records, GED 24536. CD album. 1993Google Scholar
Ngcobo, Shiyani, Introducing Shiyani Ngcobo. World Music Network, LC11067. CD album. 2004Google Scholar
The O'Jays, ‘Love Train’. CBS, S CBS 1181. 7” vinyl single. 1972Google Scholar
Phuture, ‘Phuture Jacks’. Trax Records, TX142. 12” vinyl single. 1987Google Scholar
Portishead, Dummy. Go! Disc, 422-828-600-2. CD album. 1994Google Scholar
Queen, A Night At The Opera. EMI Records, EMTC 103. 12” vinyl LP. 1975Google Scholar
Rage Against the Machine, Rage Against The Machine. Epic Records, ZK 52959. CD album. 1992Google Scholar
Sister Sledge, ‘We Are Family’. Cotillion Records, 44251. 7” vinyl single. 1979Google Scholar
Sly & The Family Stone, ‘Everyday People’. Epic Records, 5-10407. 7” vinyl single. 1968Google Scholar
Sly & The Family Stone, ‘Thank You (Falettinme Be Mice Elf Again)’. Epic Records, 5-10555. 7” vinyl single. 1969Google Scholar
Springsteen, Bruce, ‘Born to Run’. CBS Records, CBS 3661. 7” vinyl single. 1975Google Scholar