Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:35:44.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sentence interpretation by typically developing Vietnamese–English bilingual children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2010

GIANG PHAM*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
KATHRYN KOHNERT
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Giang Pham, Department of Speech–Language–Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, 115 Shevlin Hall, 164 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: tangx098@umn.edu

Abstract

We examined developing bilinguals' use of animacy and word order cues during sentence interpretation tasks administered in each of their languages. Participants were 6- to 8-year-old children who learned Vietnamese as a first language and English as a second language (n = 23). Participants listened to simple sentences and identified the agent or “doer” of the action. English-only peers (n = 23) served as a comparison group. Results indicated that the bilingual group relied more on animacy than the English-only group when interpreting sentences in English and that the bilingual group used a blending or “amalgamation” of cues to interpret English and Vietnamese sentences. Significant within-group variation in cue preference was investigated as a function of age and proficiency in the first language and second language.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alves, M. J. (1999). What's so Chinese about Vietnamese? In Thurgood, G. (Ed.), Papers from the ninth annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (pp. 221242). Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173218). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 376). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Cao, H. X. (1988). The count/mass distinction in Vietnamese and the concept of “classifier.” Zeitschrift fur Phonetik Sprachwissenschaft un Kommunikationsforschung, 41, 3847.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 107112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis-Kean, P., & Sandler, H. (2001). A meta-analysis of measures of self-esteem for young children: A framework for future measures. Child Development, 72, 887906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devescovi, A., D'Amico, S., & Gentille, P. (1999). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian: A reaction time study. First Language, 19, 129163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism, Language, and Cognition, 10, 101116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, A., Bates, E., & Avila, L. (1994). Sentence interpretation in Spanish–English bilinguals: What does it mean to be in-between? Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 417466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in French sentence comprehension. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 77117). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kan, P. F., & Kohnert, K. (2005). Preschoolers learning Hmong and English: Lexical–semantic skills in L1 and L2. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 372383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilborn, K., & Ito, T. (1989). Sentence processing strategies in adult bilinguals. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 257291). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K. (2002). Picture naming in early sequential bilinguals: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 759771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohnert, K. (2008). Language disorders in bilingual children and adults. San Diego, CA: Plural.Google Scholar
Kohnert, K., Bates, E., & Hernandez, A. E. (1999). Balancing bilinguals: Lexical–semantic production and cognitive processing in children learning Spanish and English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 14001413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohnert, K., Kan, P. F., & Conboy, B. (in press). Lexical and grammatical associations in sequential bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Bates, E., & Li, P. (1992). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 451484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. (1986). The development of sentence comprehension strategies in English and Dutch. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 317335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In Kroll, J. & DeGroot, A. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 4967). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Pleh, C., & Bates, E. (1985). The development of sentence interpretation in Hungarian. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 178209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miao, X. (1981). Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8, 109122.Google Scholar
Miao, X., Chen, G., & Yin, H. (1984). Reexamination of the roles of word order and lexical meaning in Chinese sentence comprehension. Information on Psychological Sciences, 6, 17.Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. H. (1957). Vietnamese classifiers. Word, 13, 124152.Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. H. (1997). Vietnamese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pham, G., & Kohnert, K. (2007). Typically developing language in Vietnamese–English bilingual children: A pilot study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech–Language–Hearing Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Pham, G., & Kohnert, K. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of dual-language development among Vietnamese–English bilingual children. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Pham, G., Kohnert, K., & Carney, E. (2008). Corpora of Vietnamese texts: Lexical effects of intended audience and publication place. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 154163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, C. A., Block, R. A., & Aguinis, H. (2004). Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from mulifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 916924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, T. J., & Bennett, C. E. (December 2004). We the people: Asians in the United States. Census 2000 Special Reports (US Census Bureau Report No. ASI 2004 2326-31.16). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.Google Scholar
Reyes, I. (2003). A study of sentence interpretation in Spanish monolingual children. First Language, 23, 285309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, I., & Hernandez, A. (2006). Sentence interpretation strategies in emergent bilingual children and adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 5169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
SPSS. (2005). SPSS 14.0 [Computer software]. Chicago: Author.Google Scholar
Stipek, D., & Mac Iver, D. (1989). Developmental change in children's assessment of intellectual competence. Child Development, 60, 521538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, I. (2001). Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 83112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, C., & Givón, T. (1985). On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language, 61, 329351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, E., et al. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 247250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, G. (2006). Cross-linguistic analysis of Vietnamese and English with implications for Vietnamese language acquisition and maintenance in the United States. Journal of Southeast Asian–American Education and Advancement, 2, 133.Google Scholar
Windsor, J., & Kohnert, K. (2004). In search of common ground-part I: Lexical performance by linguistically diverse learners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 877890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed