Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T16:28:00.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of the Spanish version of the DEMQOL system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2010

Ramona Lucas-Carrasco*
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Envelliment, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Donna L Lamping
Affiliation:
Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, U.K.
Sube Banerjee
Affiliation:
The Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, U.K.
Javier Rejas
Affiliation:
Health Outcomes Research Department, Medical Unit, Pfizer España, Madrid, Spain
Sarah C. Smith
Affiliation:
Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, U.K.
Juana Gómez-Benito
Affiliation:
Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Ramona Lucas-Carrasco, MD, PhD, Institut de l'Envelliment, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 171, 08041 Barcelona, Spain. Phone: +34 93 4335069; Fax: +34 93 4463505. Email: Ramona.Lucas@uab.es.

Abstract

Background: Dementia is associated with poor quality of life, but generic measures do not fully capture main aspects of these conditions. Our aim was to validate a Spanish version of the “dementia-specific health-related quality of life” DEMQOL system.

Methods: We validated the Spanish DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy in 119 people with dementia from six centers and their caregivers. Patient-reported information, including generic (WHOQOL-BREF) and dementia-specific (DEMQOL) health-related quality of life, depressive symptoms (GDS-15), functional ability (Barthel Index), subjective perception of health and demographic information, was obtained by interview. Proxy-reported information from a family caregiver about the patient's quality of life (DEMQOL-Proxy) was also obtained by interview.

Results: The Spanish DEMQOL showed good psychometric properties. Acceptability (14.3% missing data), internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.71) were good. A priori hypotheses about the relationship between DEMQOL and the WHOQOL-BREF (psychological and physical domains), GDS-15 and Barthel Index were confirmed, indicating good construct validity. Associations between DEMQOL-Proxy and other measures were weaker. A three-factor solution accounted for 44.4% of the total variance of DEMQOL, and a four-factor solution accounted for 53.3% of the total variance of DEMQOL- Proxy.

Conclusion: The Spanish versions of DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy are reliable and valid in patients with mild/moderate dementia who are living at home.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alzheimer Europe (2007). www.dementia-in-europe.eu.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. et al. (2006). Quality of life in dementia: more than just a cognition. An analysis of associations with quality of life in dementia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 77, 146148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banerjee, S. et al. (2009). What do we know about quality of life in dementia? A review of the emerging evidence on the predictive and explanatory value of disease specific measures of health related quality of life in people with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24, 1525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bech, P. et al. (2003). Association between clinically depressed subgroups, type of treatment and patient retention in he LIDO study. Psychological Medicine, 33, 10511059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brod, M., Stewart, A. L., Sands, L. and Walton, P. (1999). Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: The dementia quality of life instrument (DQoL). Gerontologist, 39, 2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ettema, T. P., Dröes, R. M., de Lange, J., Mellenbergh, G. and Ribbe, M. W. (2005). A review of quality of life instruments used in dementia. Quality of Life Research, 14, 675686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M. and Teri, L. (2002). Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 510519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas-Carrasco, R. (1998). La Versión Española del WHOQOL. Madrid: Ergón.Google Scholar
Lucas-Carrasco, R. (2007). Calidad de vida y demencia. Medicina Clínica, 128 (2), 7075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas-Carrasco, R., Skevington, S. M., Gómez-Benito, J., Rejas, J. and March, J. (2010). Using the WHOQOL-BREF in patients with dementia: a validation study. Submitted to Journal of Alzheimer Disease.Google Scholar
Mahoney, F. I. and Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index: a simple index of independence useful in scoring improvement in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 6165.Google Scholar
Rabins, P. V., Kasper, J. D., Kleinman, L., Black, B. S. and Patrick, D. L. (1999). Concepts and methods in the development of the ADRQL: an instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in persons with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 5, 3348.Google Scholar
Ready, R. E., Ott, B. R. and Grace, J. (2007). Factor structure of patient and caregiver ratings on the Dementia Quality of Life instrument. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 144154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, G., Fleck, M., Lucas, R. and Bushnell, D., for the LIDO Group (2004). Prevalence and predictors of depression treatment in an international primary care study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161: 16261634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. C. et al. (2005a). What constitutes health-related quality of life in dementia? Development of a conceptual framework for people with dementia and their carers. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 889895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. C. et al. (2005b). Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technology Assessment, 9 (10): 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. C. et al. (2007). Development of a new measure of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development (DEMQOL). Psychological Medicine, 37, 737746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trigg, R., Skevington, S. M. and Jones, R. W. (2007a). How can we best assess the quality of life of people with dementia? The Bath Assessment of Subjective Quality of Life in Dementia (BASQID). The Gerontologist, 47, 789797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trigg, R., Jones, R. W. and Skevington, S. M. (2007b). Can people with mild to moderate dementia provide reliable answers about their quality of life? Age and Ageing, 36, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, P. J. et al. (1997). Quality-of-life assessment in dementia drug development. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11 (Suppl. 3), 5660.Google ScholarPubMed
WHOQOL Group (1995). The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL); position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 14031409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHOQOL Group (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L. and Rose, T. L. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression scale: a preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar