Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:41:52.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mild Velocity Dispersion Evolution of massive galaxies since z~2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Ignacio Trujillo
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain email: trujillo@iac.es; cenarro@cefca.es Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
A. Javier Cenarro
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain email: trujillo@iac.es; cenarro@cefca.es Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Making use of public spectra from Cimatti et al. (2008), we measure for the first time the velocity dispersion of spheroid-like massive (M* ~ 1011M) galaxies at z ~ 1.6. By comparing with galaxies of similar stellar mass at lower redshifts, we find evidence for a mild evolution in velocity dispersion, decreasing from ~240 kms−1 at z ~ 1.6 down to ~180 km s−1 at z ~ 0. Such mild evolution contrasts with the strong change in size (a factor of ~4) found for these type of objects in the same cosmic time, and it is consistent with a progressive larger role, at lower redshift, of the dark matter halo in setting the velocity dispersion of these galaxies. We discuss the implications of our results within the context of different scenarios proposed for the evolution of these massive objects.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Blanton, M. R. et al. 2005, AJ, 129, 2562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buitrago, F., Trujillo, I., Conselice, C. J., Bouwens, R. J., Dickinson, M., & Yan, H. 2008, ApJ (Letters), 687, L61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenarro, A. J. & Trujillo, I. 2009, ApJ (Letters), 696, L43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimatti, A. et al. 2008 A&A, 482, 21 (C08)Google Scholar
Daddi, E. et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, 680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Serego Alighieri, S. et al. 2005, A&A, 442, 125Google Scholar
Fan, L., Lapi, A., De Zotti, G., & Danese, L. 2008, ApJ (Letters), 689, L101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Keres, D., & Wuyts, S. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khochfar, S. & Silk, J. 2006, ApJ (Letters), 648, L21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naab, T., Johansson, P. H., Ostriker, J. P., & Efstathiou, G. 2007, ApJ, 658, 710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-González, P. G., Trujillo, I., Barro, G., Gallego, J., Zamorano, J., & Conselice, C. J. 2008, ApJ, 687, 50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, I., Conselice, C. J., Bundy, K., Cooper, M. C., Eisenhardt, P., & Ellis, R. S 2007, MNRAS, 382, 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, I., Cenarro, A. J., de Lorenzo-Caceres, A., Vazdekis, A., de la Rosa, I. G., & Cava, A. 2009, ApJ (Letters), 692, L118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Wel, A., Franx, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Rix, H.-W., Illingworth, G. D., & Rosati, P. 2005, ApJ, 631, 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar