Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T03:33:01.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The delay time distribution of type Ia supernovae: theory and observation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Dany Vanbeveren
Affiliation:
Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgiumdvbevere@vub.ac.be
Nicki Mennekens
Affiliation:
Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgiumdvbevere@vub.ac.be
Jean-Pierre De Greve
Affiliation:
Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgiumdvbevere@vub.ac.be
Erwin De Donder
Affiliation:
Astrophysical Institute, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgiumdvbevere@vub.ac.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using a population number synthesis code, the theoretical time distributions of type Ia supernovae in starburst galaxies are calculated, using competing models for the formation of such events: the single degenerate (a white dwarf accreting matter from a late main sequence or red giant companion) and double degenerate (the merger of two white dwarfs) scenario. The code includes the latest results in determining the progenitors for both models. Examples are the mass stripping effect in the case of the single degenerate scenario and the differentiation between the α- (based on the balance of energy) and γ- (based on the balance of angular momentum) description of energy conversion during common envelope evolution of binaries. The shape and extent of the obtained delay time distributions critically depends on which formation scenario is used. Comparing these results to the latest observed distributions allows to draw conclusions about the constraints put on the theoretical models by these observations. We also specifically investigate the influence of the degree of conservatism during Roche lobe overflow on the delay time distribution. We conclude that the single degenerate scenario alone cannot reproduce the observed delay time distributions, and that most double degenerate type Ia supernovae are formed through a quasi-conservative Roche lobe overflow phase followed by spiral-in, as opposed to a double common envelope evolution.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

De Donder, E. & Vanbeveren, D. 2003, NewA, 8, 817Google Scholar
Hachisu, I., Kato, M., & Nomoto, K. 2008, ApJ, 679, 1390Google Scholar
Han, Z. & Podsiadlowski, P. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 1301Google Scholar
Livio, M. 2001, Space Telescope Science Institute symposium series, 13, 334Google Scholar
Mannucci, F., Della Valle, M., & Panagia, N. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 773Google Scholar
Nelemans, G. & Tout, C. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 753Google Scholar
Nomoto, K. 1982, ApJ, 253, 798Google Scholar
Piersanti, L., Gagliardi, S., Iben, I. Jr., & Tornambé, A. 2003, ApJ, 583, 885Google Scholar
Ruiter, A., Belczynski, K., & Fryer, C. 2009, ApJ, 699, 2026Google Scholar
Totani, T., Morokuma, T., Oda, T., Doi, M., & Yasuda, N. 2008, PASJ, 60, 1327Google Scholar
Webbink, R. 1984, ApJ, 277, 355Google Scholar
Yungelson, L. & Livio, M. 2000, ApJ, 528, 108Google Scholar