Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:28:03.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical abundances in planetary nebulae in three different galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Miriam Peña*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyze the PNe chemical behavior in three different galaxies, two dwarf irregulars and one spiral. Different behaviors are found. In the very low metallicity galaxy NGC 3109, PNe analyzed appear 0.39 dex O-richer than HII regions, while Ar/H ratio is, in average, 0.15 dex poorer. We interpret this as an evidence of significant O dredge-up in these LIMS, born in a very low metallicity environment. In NGC 6822, with a present metallicity 12+log O/H=8.06, two PN populations were found. A young one, with abundances similar to those in HII regions and an old population, with metallicities a factor of two lower. In this case no strong evidence for O dredge-up in LIMS is found. Therefore, metallicities lower than 12+log O/H =7.7 are required for an efficient O dredge-up. From our preliminary analysis of the abundances of PNe in NGC 300 we find that they are similar to the abundances in HII regions. Apparently, the PNe analyzed belong to a young population. Very similar abundance gradients, with galactocentric distance, are found for HII regions and for PNe.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Bresolin, F, Gieren, W., & Kudritzki, R.-P. 2009, ApJ, 700, 309Google Scholar
Evans, C. J., Bresolin, F., Urbaneja, M. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1198Google Scholar
Gieren, W., Pietrzyński, G., Soszyński, I., Bresolin, F., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 695Google Scholar
Hernández-Martínez, L. & Peña, M. 2009a, A&A, 495, 447Google Scholar
Hernández-Martínez, L., Peña, M., Carigi, L., & García-Rojas, J. 2009b, A&A, 505, in pressGoogle Scholar
Kingsburgh, R. & Barlow, M. 1994, MNRAS, 271, 257Google Scholar
Lee, H., McCall, M. L., Kingsburgh, R. L., Ross R., & Stevenson, C. C. 2003, AJ, 125, 146Google Scholar
Kniazev, A. Y., Grebel, E. K., Pustilnik, S. A., Pramskij, A. G., & Zucker, D. B. 2005, AJ, 130, 1558Google Scholar
Leisy, P. & Dennefeld, M. 2006, A&A, 456, 451Google Scholar
Magrini, L., Leisy, P., Corradi, R. L. M., et al. 2005, A&A, 443, 115Google Scholar
Marigo, P. 2001, A&A, 370, 194Google Scholar
Peña, M., Richer, M. G., & Stasińska, G. 2007a, A&A, 466, 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña, M., Stasińska, G., & Richer, M. G., 2007b, A&A, 476, 745Google Scholar