Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-zrclq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T18:52:03.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Colonization of an artificial reef in south-west England—ex-HMS ‘Scylla’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Keith Hiscock ,
Sally Sharrock ,
James Highfield  and
Deborah Snelling
Keith Hiscock*
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK
Sally Sharrock
Affiliation:
Seasearch, 19 Hawthorn Drive, Wembury, Plymouth PL9 0BE, UK
James Highfield
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, Plymouth, Devon, PL1 3DH, UK
Deborah Snelling
Affiliation:
National Marine Aquarium, Rope Walk, Coxside, Plymouth, PL4 0LF, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: K. Hiscock, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK email: khis@mba.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An ex-Royal Navy frigate, HMS ‘Scylla’, was placed on the seabed in Whitsand Bay, south Cornwall on 27 March 2004. After five years, the reef supported a mature steel wreck community. The colonization of the reef showed wide fluctuations in species abundance in the first two years but, by 2006, most species that dominated or characterized the reef after five years had settled. Significant colonization events included settlement of barnacles, tubeworms and hydroids within a month and remarkably high settlements of the sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris and the queen scallop Aequipecten opercularis in the first year together with starfish Asterias rubens, solitary sea squirts and ephemeral algae. The plumose anemone Metridium senile, a characteristic species of wrecks, arrived in late summer 2004 but the widely distributed dead man's fingers Alcyonium digitatum was not observed until spring 2005. Wrasse were slow to colonize the reef but were established in small numbers by the end of 2007. Sea fans, Eunicella verrucosa, were first observed in August 2007. The species count for the reef stood at 263 taxa by the end of March 2009. The inside of the reef remained poorly colonized even after five years. Areas coated with tributyltin (TBT) antifouling paint only had colonization where the paint had flaked-off or on non-toxic paint markings, but with some indication that colonization may be occurring by a very few species especially near to non-TBT areas. Many species characteristic of natural reefs had not settled and neither do they occur on older wrecks including branching axinellid sponges, some cushion sponges and the yellow cluster anemone Parazoanthus axinellae. The artificial reef developed a community that was distinctly different to nearby natural rock reefs and such artificial structures should not be considered as a replacement for damaged or destroyed natural habitats.

Keywords

artificial reefshipwreckcolonizationseasonal changeTBTcommunity development
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 69 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arai, T., Harino, H., Ohji, M. and Langston, W.J. (eds) (2009). Ecotoxicology of antifouling biocides. Tokyo, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, S.D. (2001) Urban structures as marine habitats: an experimental comparison of the composition and abundance of subtidal epibiota among pilings, pontoons and rocky reefs. Marine Environmental Research 52, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, D.W., Allen, J.H., Golding, N., Howell, K.L., Lieberknecht, L.M., Northen, K.O. and Recker, J.B. (2004). The marine habitat classification for Britain and Ireland. Version 04.05. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Available from: wwww.jncc.gov.uk/marinehabitatclassificationGoogle Scholar
Connor, D. and Hiscock, K. (1996) Data collection methods. In Hiscock, K. (ed.) Marine Nature Conservation Review: rationale and methods. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
Hiscock, K. (1981) Marine life on the wreck of the “M.V. Robert”. Report of the Lundy Field Society 32, 40–44.Google Scholar
Hiscock, K. (ed.) (1996) Marine Nature Conservation Review: rationale and methods. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
Hiscock, K. and Hoare, R. (1973) A portable suction sampler for rock epibiota. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 25, 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscock, K. and Moore, J. (1986) Surveys of harbours, rias and estuaries in Southern Britain. Plymouth area including the Yealm. Nature Conservancy Council, CSD Report No. 752.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.C. and Collins, K.J. (1995) The Poole Bay artificial reef project 1989 to 1994. Biologia Marina Mediterranea 2, 111–122.Google Scholar
Jensen, A.C., Collins, K.J. and Lockwood, A.P.M. (eds) (2000) Artificial reefs in European Seas. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langhamer, O., Wilhelmsson, D. and Engstrom, J. (2009) Artificial reef effects and fouling impacts on offshore wave power foundations and bouys—a pilot study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 82, 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leewis, R.J. and Hallie, F. (2000) An artificial reef experiment off the Dutch Coast. In Jensen, A.C., Collins, K.J. and Lockwood, A.P.M. (eds) Artificial reefs in European Seas. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leewis, R., van Moorsel, G. and Waardenburg, H. (2000). Shipwrecks on the Dutch continental shelf as artificial reefs. In Jensen, A.C., Collins, K.J. and Lockwood, A.P.M. (eds) Artificial reefs in European Seas. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moura, A., Boaventura, D., Curdia, J., Carvalho, S., Cancela Da Fosca, L, Leitao, F.M., Santos, M.N. and Monteiro, C.C. (2007) Effect of depth and reef structure on early macrobenthic communities of the Algarve artificial reefs (southern Portugal). Hydrobiologia 580, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoletti, L., Marzialetti, S., Paganelli, D. and Ardizzone, G.D. (2007) Long-term change in a benthic assemblage associated with artificial reefs. Hydrobiologia 580, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkol-Finkel, S. and Benayahu, Y. (2005) Recruitment of benthic organisms onto a planned artificial reef: shifts in community structure one decade post-deployment. Marine Environmental Research 59, 79–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkol-Finkel, S., Shaskar, N. and Benayahu, Y. (2006) Can artificial reefs mimic natural reef communities? The roles of structural features and age. Marine Environmental Research 61, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picton, B.E. and Morrow, C.C. (1994) A field guide to the nudibranchs of the British Isles. London: IMMEL.Google Scholar
Relini, G., Relini, M., Palandri, G., Merello, S. and Beccornia, E. (2007) History, ecology and trends for artificial reefs of the Ligurian Sea, Italy. Hydrobiologia 580, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaman, W. (2007) Artificial habitats and the restoration of degraded marine ecosystems and fisheries. Hydrobiologia 580, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R., Bolam, S.G., Rees, H.L. and Mason, C. (2008) Macrofaunal recovery following TBT ban. Long-term recovery of subtidal macrofaunal communities in relation to declining levels of TBT contamination. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 136, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snelling, D. (2006) The ‘Scylla’ monitoring programme 2004–2006. A report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Plymouth: National Marine Aquarium.Google Scholar
Whomersley, P. and Picken, G.B. (2003) Long-term dynamics of fouling communities found on offshore installations in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 897–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C. (2007) Seasearch observers guide to marine life of Britain and Ireland. Ross-on-Wye: Marine Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Zintzen, V., Norro, A., Massin, C. and Mallefet, J. (2008a) Spatial variability of epifaunal communities from artificial habitat: shipwrecks in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 76, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zintzen, V., Norro, A., Massin, C. and Mallefet, J. (2008b) Temporal variation of Tubularia indivisa (Cnidaria: Tubulariidae) and associated epizoites on artificial habitat communities in the North Sea. Marine Biology 153, 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar