No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Meaning and Evidence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2010
Extract
What is it for a person to mean something by an utterance? Until recently, few philosophers have explicitly set themselves the task of answering this question. Of those who have, most have proposed answers which in one way or another analyze the act of meaning by appeal to the utterer's intentions.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 203 - 225
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1976
References
1 “Meaning”, The Philosophical Review, 66 (1957), pp. 377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Utterer's Meaning and Intentions”, The Philosophical Review, 78 (1969), pp. 147–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning”, Foundations of Language, 4 (1968), pp. 225–242.Google Scholar
2 Meaning, Oxford, 1972.Google Scholar
3 Speech Acts, Cambridge, 1969Google Scholar; especially pp. 42–50.
4 “Meaning and Communication”, The Philosophical Review, 80 (1971), pp. 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 See for instance Grice, “Meaning”, pp. 385–386.
6 See for instance Armstrong, “Meaning and Communication”, pp. 443–444.
7 “Utterer's Meaning and Intentions”, pp. 152–165; also clause “III” on p. 176.
8 Meaning, p. 30 ff.
9 “The Meaning-Nominalist Strategy”, Foundations of Language, 10 (1973), pp. 141–168; also unpublished work which should appear soon as a book.Google Scholar