Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Cambridge Journals Online - CUP Full-Text Page
Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2009), 32:515-516 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
doi:10.1017/S0140525X09991403

Open Peer Commentary

Ideology as cooperative affordance


Joseph Bulbuliaa1 and Richard Sosisa2

a1 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand joseph.bulbulia@vuw.ac.nz www.victoria.ac.nz/religion/staff/joseph_bulbulia/
a2 Department of Anthropology, U-2176, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-2176. richard.sosis@uconn.edu www.anth.uconn.edu/faculty/sosis/
Article author query
bulbulia j [PubMed]  [Google Scholar]
sosis r [PubMed]  [Google Scholar]

Abstract

McKay & Dennett (M&D) observe that beliefs need not be true in order to evolve. We connect this insight with Schelling's work on cooperative commitment to suggest that some beliefs – ideologies – are best approached as social goals. We explain why a social-interactive perspective is important to explaining the dynamics of belief formation and revision among situated partners.

The evolution of misbelief Ryan T. McKay and Daniel C. Dennett Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich 8006, Switzerland; and Centre for Anthropology and Mind, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PE, United Kingdom ryantmckay@mac.com http://homepage.mac.com/ryantmckay/; The Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155-7059 ddennett@tufts.edu http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/incbios/dennettd/dennettd.htm


Metrics