Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:41:07.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Feminists Be Cartesians?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Brie Gertler
Brie Gertler
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 91 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antony, Louise 1993 “Quine as Feminist: The Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology.” In A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Edited by Antony, L. and Witt, C.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 185–225.Google Scholar
Baier, Baier 1985 “Cartesian Persons.” In Postures of the Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 74–92.Google Scholar
Baier, Baier 1993 “Hume: The Reflective Women's Epistemologist?” In A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Edited by Antony, L. and Witt, C.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
Bartky, Bartky 1990 Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de 1973 The Second Sex. Translated and edited by Parshley, H. M.. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Benhabib 1987 “The Generalized and the Concrete Other.” In Women and Moral Theory. Edited by Kittay, E. and Meyers, D.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 154–77.Google Scholar
Bordo, Bordo 1987 The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Bordo 1992 “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy.” In Women and Reason. Edited by Harvey, E. and Okruhlik, K.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 143–62.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Chodorow 1978 The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, Code 1991 What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Code, Code 1992 “The Unicorn in the Garden.” In Women and Reason. Edited by Harvey, E. and Okruhlik, K.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 263–82.Google Scholar
Code, Code 1995 “Taking Subjectivity into Account.” In Rhetorical Spaces: Essays on Gendered Locations. Edited by Code, L.. New York: Routledge, pp. 23–57.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1988 “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings. Translated by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duran, Jane 1990 Towards a Feminist Epistemology. New York: Rowman & Little field.Google Scholar
Gertler, Brie 2001 “Introspecting Phenomenal States,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63: 305–28.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol 1982 In A Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert 1986 “Folk Psychology as Simulation.” Mind and Language, 1: 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra 1993 “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: ‘What Is Strong Objectivity?’” In Feminist Epistemologies. Edited by Alcoff, L. and Potter, E.. New York: Routledge, pp. 49–82.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy 1983 “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In Discovering Reality. Edited by Harding, S. and Hintikka, M.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 283–310.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary 1986 “The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises.” In Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Edited by Rorty, A.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 45––80.Google Scholar
Heal, Jane 1986 “Replication and Functionalism.” In Language, Mind, and Logic. Edited by Butterfield, J.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–50.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison 1996 “Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology.” In Women, Knowledge, and Reality. Edited by Garry, A. and Pearsall, M.. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 166–90.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine 1987a “Desire and Power.” In Feminism Unmodified. Edited by MacKinnon, C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine 1987b “Not a Moral Issue.” In Feminism Unmodified. Edited by MacKinnon, C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 146–62.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lynn Hankinson 1990 Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry 1974 “Is Female to Male as Nature Is to Culture?” In Women, Culture, and Society. Edited by Rosaldo, M. and Lamphere, L.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 67–87.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana 1996 “Science, Nature, and Gender.” In Women, Knowledge, and Reality. Edited by Garry, A. and Pearsall, M.. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, pp. 264–85.Google Scholar