Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:23:58.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensitivity to ethylene as a major component in the germination of seeds of Stylosanthes humilis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Dimas Mendes Ribeiro  and
Raimundo Santos Barros
Dimas Mendes Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36571-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
Raimundo Santos Barros*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36571-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
*
*Correspondence: Fax: +55 31 3899 2580, Email: rsbarros@ufv.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Physiological dormancy of scarified seeds of Townsville stylo (Stylosanthes humilis H.B.K.) is broken by ethylene. When the biosynthesis of this gas was impaired by 2-aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) plus Co2+, the response to ethylene at very low concentrations was appreciable in non-dormant seeds and nil in the dormant ones. Complete inhibition of germination of non-dormant seeds occurred only when they were treated with AVG plus Co2+ under an ethylene-free atmosphere, a condition in which no trace of the gas in the atmosphere of Erlenmeyer flasks could be detected. Injection of ethylene into that system triggered germination of both dormant and non-dormant seeds, demonstrating a requirement for the gas. Non-dormant seeds were at least 50-fold more sensitive to ethylene than the dormant ones. Perception of ethylene occurred within a very short time (at most 15 min), since exposure of both dormant and non-dormant seeds to the gas, at a steeply declining concentration, sufficed to cause substantial germination.

Keywords

dormancyethylenegerminationhormone sensitivityinhibitionStylosanthes humilis
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 37 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeles, F.B. (1973) Ethylene in plant biology. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Abeles, F.B., Morgan, P.W. and Saltveit, M.E. Jr (1992) Ethylene in plant biology. 2nd edition New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Barros, R.S. and Neill, S.J. (1986) Periodicity of response to abscisic acid in lateral buds of willow (Salix viminalis L.). Planta 168, 530–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradford, K.J. and Trewavas, A.J. (1994) Sensitivity thresholds and variable time scales in plant hormone action. Plant Physiology 105, 1029–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egley, G.H. (1980) Stimulation of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) seed germination by injections of ethylene into soil. Weed Science 28, 510–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firn, R.D. (1986) Growth substance sensitivity: The need for clearer ideas, precise terms and purposeful experiments. Physiologia Plantarum 67, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, J. and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1998) Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 94, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kępczyńsky, J. and Karssen, C.M. (1985) Requirement for the action of endogenous ethylene during germination of non-dormant seeds of Amaranthus caudatus. Physiologia Plantarum 63, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kępczyńsky, J. and Kępczyńska, E. (1997) Ethylene in seed dormancy and germination. Physiologia Plantarum 101, 720–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klee, H.J. (2004) Ethylene signal transduction. Moving beyond Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 135, 660–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machabée, S. and Saini, H.S. (1991) Differences in the requirement for endogenous ethylene during germination of dormant and non-dormant seeds of Chenopodium album L. Journal of Plant Physiology 138, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munné-Bosch, S., Peñuelas, J., Asensio, D., Llusià, J. (2004) Airborne ethylene may alter antioxidant protection and reduce tolerance of holm oak to heat and drought stress. Plant Physiology 136, 2937–2947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelacani, C.R., Barros, R.S., Ribeiro, D.M. and Frigeri, R.B.C. (2005) Breaking dormancy of Stylosanthes humilis seeds with low pH solutions. Acta Physiologia Plantarum 27, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, F.J.A. (2004) Quebra da dormência de sementes de Stylosanthes humilis H.B.K. por compostos selênicos, DSc Thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, D.M. and Barros, R.S. (2004a) Germination of dormant seeds of Stylosanthes humilis as promoted by ethylene accumulation in closed environments. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 16, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, D.M. and Barros, R.S. (2004b) A technique devised for detecting the ethylene requirement for germination as illustrated with Stylosanthes humilis seeds. Seed Science and Technology 32, 863–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, H.S., Consolación, E.D., Bassi, P.K. and Spencer, M.S. (1989b) Control processes in the induction and relief of thermoinhibition of lettuce seed germination. Actions of phytochrome and endogenous ethylene. Plant Physiology 90, 311–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saltveit, M.E. and Yang, S.F. (1987) Ethylene. pp. 367–396. in Rivier, L.;, Crozier, A. (Eds) Principles and practice of plant hormone analysis. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schonbeck, M.W. and Egley, G.M. (1981) Changes in sensitivity of Amaranthus retroflexus L. seeds to ethylene during preincubation II. Effects of alternating temperature and burial in soil. Plant, Cell and Environment 4, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A.J. and Knott, M. (1974) A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30, 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepanova, N.A. and Alonso, J.N. (2005) Ethylene signalling and response pathway: a unique signalling cascade with a multiple of inputs and outputs. Physiologia Plantarum 123, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trewavas, A. (1981) How do plant growth substances work?. Plant, Cell and Environment 4, 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trewavas, A.J. (1982) Growth substance sensitivity: The limiting factor in plant development. Physiologia Plantarum 55, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trewavas, A.J. (1987) Sensitivity and sensory adaptation in growth substance response. pp. 19–38. in Hoad, G.V.;, Lenton, J.R.;, Jackson, M.B.;, Atkin, R.K. (Eds) Hormone action in plant development: A critical appraisal. London, Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieira, H.D. and Barros, R.S. (1994) Responses of seed of Stylosanthes humilis to germination regulators. Physiologia Plantarum 92, 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar