Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T08:49:40.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computation and Intentional Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Murat Aydede
Murat Aydede
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Spring 2000 , pp. 365 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aydede, Murat 1997a “Language of Thought: The Connectionist Contribution.” Minds and Machines, 7, 1: 57–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydede, Murat 1997b “Has Fodor Really Changed His Mind on Narrow Content?” Mind and Language, 12, 3/4 (September/December): 422–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydede, Murat 2000 “On the Type/Token Relations of Mental Representations.” Facta Philosophia, 2, 1: 23–49.Google Scholar
Forthcoming “Computation and Functionalism: Can Psychology Be Done ‘Syntactically’?” In Boston Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, edited by Güzeldere, G. and Irzik, G.. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Laurence W. 1987 “The Instability of Graded Structure: Implications for the Nature of Concepts.” In Concepts and Conceptual Development, edited by Neisser, U.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ned 1986 “Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Mind: Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 10, edited by French, P., Euhling, T., and Wettstein, H.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Block, Ned 1991 “What Narrow Content Is Not.” In Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics, edited by Loewer, B. and Rey, G.. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Block, Ned 1993 “Holism, Hyper-Analyticity and Hyper-Compositionality.” Mind and Language, 8, 1: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael 1990 “A Narrow Representational Theory of the Mind.” In Mind and Cognition, edited by Lycan, W. G.. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael 1991 “Why Fodor Can't Have It Both Ways.” In Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics, edited by Loewer, B. and Rey, G.. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Devitt, Michael 1996 Coming to Our Senses: A Naturalistic Program for Semantic Localism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry 1978 “Mental Representation.” Erkenntnis, 13, 1: 9–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1978 “Computation and Reduction.” In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981. (Originally appeared in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Perception and Cognition, Vol. 9, edited by W. Savage [1978].)Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1980 “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology.” In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981. (Originally appeared in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1 [1980].)Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1987 Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1989 “Substitution Arguments and the Individuation of Belief.” In A Theory of Content and Other Essays, by J. Fodor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990. (Originally appeared in Method, Reason and Language, edited by G. Boolos [Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989].)Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1990 A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1991 “Replies.” In Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics, edited by Loewer, B. and Rey, G., chap. 15. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1994 The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and Its Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Pierre 1997 What Minds Can Do: Intentionality in a Non-Intentional World Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loar, Brian F. 1982 Mind and Meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rey, Georges In prep. The Possibility of Philosophy. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen 1987 Remnants of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen P. 1978 “Autonomous Psychology and the Belief-Desire Thesis.” In Mind and Cognition, edited by Lycan, W. G.. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell, 1990. (Originally appeared in The Monist, 61 [1978]: 573–91.)Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen P. 1983 From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen P. 1991 “Narrow Content Meets Fat Syntax.” In Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics, edited by Loewer, B. and Rey, G.. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar