Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Lubinski, David
and
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
1990.
A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness.
Intelligence,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 3,
p.
327.
Feingold, Alan
1992.
Sex Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A New Look at an Old Controversy.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 1,
p.
61.
Lubinski, David
and
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
1992.
Some bodily and medical correlates of mathematical giftedness and commensurate levels of socioeconomic status.
Intelligence,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
99.
Hedges, Larry V.
and
Friedman, Lynn
1993.
Gender Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A Reanalysis of Feingold’s Results.
Review of Educational Research,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 1,
p.
94.
Thomas, Hoben
1993.
A theory explaining sex differences in high mathematical ability has been around for some time.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
187.
Stumpf, Heinrich
and
Jackson, Douglas N.
1994.
Gender-related differences in cognitive abilities: Evidence from a medical school admissions testing program.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
335.
Witt, Elizabeth A.
Dunbar, Stephen B.
and
Hoover, H.D.
1994.
A Multivariate Perspective on Sex Differences in Achievement and Later Performance Among Adolescents.
Applied Measurement in Education,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 3,
p.
241.
Stumpf, Heinrich
and
Eliot, John
1995.
Gender-related differences in spatial ability and the k factor of general spatial ability in a population of academically talented students.
Personality and Individual Differences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Stumpf, Heinrich
1995.
Gender differences in performance on tests of cognitive abilities: Experimental design issues and empirical results.
Learning and Individual Differences,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
275.
Crow, T. J.
1996.
All sex differences in cognitive ability may be explained by an X-Y homologous gene determining degrees of cerebral asymmetry.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
249.
Feingold, Alan
1996.
On an evolutionary model of sex differences in mathematics: Do the data support the theory?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
252.
Sherman, Julia A.
1996.
Spatial visualization and sex-related differences in mathematical problem solving.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
262.
Geary, David C.
1996.
Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
229.
Rowe, David C.
1996.
The twain shall meet: Uniting the analysis of sex differences and within-sex variation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
262.
Wynn, Thomas
Tierson, Forrest
and
Palmer, Craig
1996.
Sex differences and evolutionary by-products.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
265.
Tan, Üner
1996.
We are far from understanding sex-related differences in spatial-mathematical abilities despite the theory of sexual selection.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
264.
Humphreys, Lloyd G.
1996.
A critic with a different perspective.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
257.
Charness, Neil
and
Gerchak, Yigal
1996.
Participation Rates and Maximal Performance: A Log-Linear Explanation for Group Differences, Such as Russian and Male Dominance in Chess.
Psychological Science,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 1,
p.
46.
Kornbrot, Diana Eugenie
1996.
Resources dimorphism sexual selection and mathematics achievement.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
259.
Thomas, Hoben
1996.
Between-sex differences are often averaging artifacts.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 2,
p.
265.