Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:26:35.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The politics of security and international law in Norway's Arctic waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2009

Øystein Jensen  and
Svein Vigeland Rottem
Øystein Jensen
Affiliation:
The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, P.O. Box 326, Fridtjof Nansens vei 17, 1326 Lysaker, Norway (oyj@fni.no)
Svein Vigeland Rottem
Affiliation:
The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, P.O. Box 326, Fridtjof Nansens vei 17, 1326 Lysaker, Norway (oyj@fni.no)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Security policy challenges in the high north should be approached both as an insight into the international legal framework on which co-existence in the region rests and as a sober realpolitik analysis. Against this background, the objective of this article is to paint a more balanced picture of security policy options in Norway's Arctic waters, rather than observing contemporary general discourse on the topic might suggest. Management of marine resources, delimitation of unresolved maritime boundaries and relations with Russia in the northern maritime areas are used as examples to substantiate our main thesis which is that dispassionate diplomacy is more likely to resolve disputes than is military confrontation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 75 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borgerson, S.G. 2008. The Arctic meltdown. The economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Affairs 87 (2): 63–77.Google Scholar
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., and de Wilde, J.. 1998. Security: a new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Børresen, J. 2005. Forsvar uten trussel. Det norske Forsvarets rolle og funksjon etter den kalde krigen. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag AS.Google Scholar
Churchill, R., and Ulfstein, G.. 1992. Marine management in disputed areas: the case of the Barents Sea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
CCS (Convention on the Continental Shelf).1958. Convention on the Continental Shelf, Geneva, 29 April 1958. In: United Nations Treaty Series 499: 311.Google Scholar
Diesen, S. 2007. New perspectives on military power in the Arctic. Speech by Chief of the General Staff of Norway. Tromsø, 25 September 2007. URL: http://www.mil.no/multimedia/archive/00099/New_Perspectives_on__99589a.doc (accessed 6 May 2009).Google Scholar
Dokumenty. 1964. Dokumenty Vneshnej Politiki SSSR [Documents of the Foreign Policy of the USSR] 9:28. In: Rozakis, C. 1989. Continental shelf. In: Bernhardt, R. (editor). Encyclopedia of Public International Law vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Fleischer, C.A. 1976. Oil and Svalbard. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Internasjonal Ret (Acta Scandinavica juris gentium) 46 (1–2): 7–13.Google Scholar
Fleischer, C.A. 1983. Petroleumsrett. Oslo: UniversitetsforlagetGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, C.A. 1994. Folkerett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Graff, J. 2007. Fight for the top of the world. Time Magazine 19 September 2007. URL: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1663445,00.html (accessed 6 May 2009).Google Scholar
Hønneland, G. 2006. Kvotekamp og kystsolidaritet. Norsk-russisk fiskeriforvaltning gjennom 30 år. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
Ilulisat Declaration. 2008. Ilulissat Declaration. Ilulissat, Greenland: Arctic Ocean Conference (27–29 May 2008). URL: http://uk.nanoq.gl/Emner/News/News_from_Parliament/2008/05/~/media/66562304FA4649-45BB621411BFFB6E12.ashx. (accessed 6 May 2009).Google Scholar
Jóhannesson, G.T. 2005. Sympathy and self-interest. Norway and the Anglo-Icelandic cod wars. Forsvarsstudier 1 (26): 4–148.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J.H. 2004. Svalbard: russiske persepsjoner og politikkutforming. Internasjonal politikk 62 (2): 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R.O., and Nye, J.S.. 1977. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Korovin, E.A. 1926. SSSR i polarnye zemli [The USSR and the polar lands]. Sovetskoe pravo 3: 43–46.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Moe, A. 2008. The Russian Barents Sea: openings for Norway? In: Gottemoeller, R., and Tamnes, R. (editors), High north: high stakes. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget: 75–85.Google Scholar
NATO. 2009. Speech by NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer on security prospects in the high north. Reykjavik, Iceland 29 January 2009. URL: http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2009/s090129a.html (accessed 6 May 2009).Google Scholar
Neumann, I.B. 2002. Norges handlingsrom og behovet for en overgripende sikkerhetspolitisk strategi. Det sikkerhetspolitiske bibliotek 3 (9): 3–21.Google Scholar
Norway, Act. 1963. Act relating to scientific research and exploration for and exploitation of subsea natural resources other than petroleum resources [Lov om vitenskapelig utforskning og undersøkelse etter og utnyttelse av andre undersjøiske naturforekomster enn petroleumsforekomster] 21 June 1963 No. 12 Section 1. In: Flock, H., and Birger, S.L. (editors). Norges lover. Mikkeli: St. Michel Print Oy.Google Scholar
Norway, Ministry of Defence. 2008. Et forsvar til vern om Norges sikkerhet, interesser og verdier. [Defending Norwegian security, interests and values]. Oslo: Ministry of Defence (Government Proposal 48 (2007–2008)). URL: http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/fd/dok/regpubl/stprp/2007–2008/stprp-nr-48–2007-2008-.html?id=504783 (Accessed 6 May 2009).Google Scholar
Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2006. The Norwegian Government's high north strategy. Oslo, Tromsø: Ministry of Foreign Affairs. URL: http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/kilde/ud/pla/2006/0006/ddd/pdfv/302927-nstrategi06.pdf (accessed 6 May 2009)Google Scholar
Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2008. Om samtykke til ratifikasjon av overenskomst av 11. juli 2007 mellom Norge og Russland om den maritime avgrensning i Varangerfjordområdet [On consent to the ratification of the agreement of 11 July 2007 concerning the maritime delimitation of the Varangerfjord area]. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Government Proposal 3 (2007–2008)). URL: http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/ud/dok/regpubl/stprp/2007–2008/Stprp-nr-3–2007-2008-.html?id=488644 (accessed 6 May 2009)Google Scholar
Norway, Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. 2008. Fakta: Norsk petroleumsverksemd. Olso: Ministry of Petroleum and Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.Google Scholar
Norway, Police Security Service. 2009. Unclassified threat assessment 2009. URL: http://www.pst.politiet.no/System/english/Annual%20%20threat%20assessment/Unclassified%20threat%20assessment%202009.pdf (accessed 6 May 2009)Google Scholar
Norway, Royal Decree. 1977. Royal Decree, 3 June 1977 pursuant to section 1 of the Act on Norway's Economic Zone of 17 December 1976 no 91. In: Flock, H., and Birger, S.L. (editors). Norges lover. Mikkeli: St. Michel Print Oy.Google Scholar
Riste, O. 2005. Norway's foreign relations – A history. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS.Google Scholar
Rozakis, C. 1989. Continental shelf. In: Bernhardt, R. (editor) Encyclopedia of Public International Law 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Strøm-Erichsen, A.-G. 2007. Verdier verd å verne [Values worth defending]. Defence Minister's address to the Oslo Military Society, 8 January 2007. URL: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/fd/The-Ministry/defence-minister-anne-grete-strom-erichs/Speeches-and-articles/2007/Verdier-verd-a-verne.html?id=440937 (accessed 6 May 2009).Google Scholar
Strøm-Erichsen, A.-G. 2008. Trusler og utfordringer, sikkerhet og forsva [Threats and challenges, security and defence]. Defence Minister's address to the Oslo Military Society, 7 January 2008. URL: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/fd/The-Ministry/defence-minister-anne-grete-strom-erichs/Speeches-and-articles/2008/Threats-and-challenges-security-and-defe.html?id=495932 (accessed 6 May 2009)Google Scholar
Treaty. 1920. Treaty concerning the archipelago of Spitsbergen (adopted 9 Frbruary 1920, entered into force 14 August 1925) In: 2 League of Nations treaty series (LNTS) 7.Google Scholar
Tunander, O. 2008. Geopolitics of the north: geopolitik of the weak. Cooperation and Conflict. 43 (2): 164–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulfstein, G. 1995. The Svalbard Treaty. From ‘terra nullius’ to Norwegian sovereignty. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
UNCLOS. 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Montego Bay, 10 December 1982. UN document A/CONF, 62/122. In: International Legal Materials 21: 1,26 l ff.Google Scholar
UNCLOS III. 1973–1982. Third United Nations conferences on the law of the sea. Official Records. Vols I-XVII. In: Platzoder, R. (editor). 1982–1987. Third United Nations conferences on the law of the sea. 12 vols. Dobbs Ferry, New York:Google Scholar
Underhill, W. 2007. Norwegian gold. Newsweek 8 January 2007. URL: http://www.newsweek.com/id/56729 (accessed 20 May 2009)Google Scholar
Vylegzhanin, A.N., and Zilanov, V.K.. 2007. Spitsbergen: legal regime of adjacent marine areas. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Zysk, K. 2008. Russian military power and the Arctic. Brussels: EU–Russia Centre (EU–Russia Centre's Review VIII – Russian Foreign Policy). URL: http://www.eu-russiacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/review_viii_final_13_10.pdf (accessed 6 May 2009).Google Scholar