Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T00:14:44.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pacific Discourses About Cultural Heritage and Its Protection: An Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Toon van Meijl
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen. Email: t.vanmeijl@ru.nl

Abstract

The articles collected in this special issue aim at addressing the debate about the protection and use of cultural heritage in the Pacific within the context of globalization. Contributions aim specifically at analyzing the tension that exists between, on the one hand, political, legal and economic discourses of Pacific peoples who wish to retain control and who seek protection of the use of their cultural heritage, and, on the other hand, the view of others arguing that it is in the interest of the general public to lift as many embargos as possible in order to stimulate research and to increase economic growth. All authors approach the subject of cultural and intellectual property rights as a discourse, with specific attention for the concepts of property and ownership, particularly in relation to cultural heritage and cultural knowledge; the potential benefits of property; appropriate protection mechanisms; the complexities of the discourses about rights, especially property rights; the appropriation of property or its misappropriation, often associated with what is freely available in the public domain; and, finally, the use of intellectual property as either a form of enclosure or as a form of ethnic boundary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appadurai, Arjun, ed. Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arewa, Olufunmilayo B.TRIPS and Traditional Knowledge: Local Communities, Local Knowledge and Global Intellectual Property Frameworks.” Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 10, no. 2 (2006): 156–80.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Can Culture Be Copyrighted?Current Anthropology 39, no. 2 (1998): 193222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Michael F. “Heritage as Property.” In Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy, edited by Verdery, K. and Humphrey, C., 4968. Oxford: Berg, 2004.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brush, Stephen B.Indigenous Knowledge of Biological Resources and Intellectual Property Rights: The Role of Anthropology.” American Anthropologist 95, no. 3 (1993): 653–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James. “Looking Several Ways: Anthropology and Native Heritage in Alaska.” Current Anthropology 45, no. 1 (2004): 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J.The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary J. “Protecting Cultural Industries to Promote Cultural Diversity.” In International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, edited by Maskus, K. and Reichman, J., 559614. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K., Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte, and Wilson, Richard A., eds. Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denoon, Donald, Firth, with Stewart, Linnekin, Jocelyn, Meleisea, Malama, and Nero, Karen, eds. The Cambridge History of the Pacific Islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. “Religious and Secular Colonization: Common Ground.” History and Anthropology 4 (1990): 339–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H.Oceania and the Problem of Controls in the Study of Cultural and Human Evolution.” The Journal of the Polynesian Society 66, no. 2 (1957): 146–55.Google Scholar
Greaves, Thomas. “Tribal Rights.” In Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights, edited by Brush, S.B. and Stabinsky, D., 2540. Washington: Island Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. “Cultural Boundaries.” Anthropology Today 15, no. 5 (1999): 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon. Fracturing Resemblances: Identity and Mimetic Conflict in Melanesia and the West. New York: Berghahn, 2006.Google Scholar
Hastrup, Kisten. “Representing the Common Good: The Limits of Legal Language.” In Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements, edited by Wilson, R.A. and Mitchell, J.P., 1632. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Eric, and Strathern, Marilyn, eds. Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneff, Deema, and King, Alexander D.. “Owning Culture.” Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology 44 (2004): 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Stuart. “Lost Worlds: Environmental Disaster, ‘Culture Loss’ and the Law.” Current Anthropology 42, no. 2 (2001): 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowie, Robert H.Primitive Society. New York: Liveright, 1947.Google Scholar
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake, and Ratuva, Steven, eds. Pacific Genes and Life Patents: Pacific Indigenous Experiences and Analysis of the Commodification and Ownership of Life. Wellington: Call of the Earth (Llamado de la Tierra) and Institute of Advanced Studies, United Nations University, 2007. Available at http://www.ias.unu.edu/sub_page.aspx?catID=97&dd1ID=229 (accessed 25 October, 2009).Google Scholar
Pacific Community, Secretariat of the. Guidelines for Developing National Legislation for the Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Culture Based on the Pacific Model Law 2002. Noumea: Secretariat of the Pacific Community, 2006.Google Scholar
Posey, Darrell A. “International Agreements and Intellectual Property Right Protection for Indigenous Peoples.” In Intellectual Property Rights for Indigenous Peoples, edited by Greaves, T., 223–51. Oklahoma City: Society for Applied Anthropology, 1994.Google Scholar
Rowlands, Michael. “Cultural Rights and Wrongs: Uses of the Concept of Property.” In Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy, edited by Verdery, K. and Humphrey, C., 207–26. Oxford: Berg, 2004.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “Potential Property: Intellectual Rights and Property in Persons.” Social Anthropology 4, no. 1 (1996): 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone, 1999.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “Rationales of Ownership.” In Rationales of Ownership: Transactions and Claims to Ownership in Contemporary Papua New Guinea, edited by Kalinoe, L. and Leach, J., 112. Wantage, UK: Sean Kingston, 2004.Google Scholar
Striphas, Ted, and McLeod, Kembrew. “Strategic Improprieties: Cultural Studies, the Everyday and the Politics of Intellectual Properties.” Cultural Studies 20, no. 2–3 (2006): 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E.P.The Long Revolution.” New Left Review no. 9-10 (1961): 2439.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard Ashby, and Mitchell, Jon P., eds. Human Rights in Global Perspective: Anthropological Studies of Rights, Claims and Entitlements. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar