Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T13:32:17.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autonomy, Benevolence, and Alzheimer's Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2001

PAM R. SAILORS
Affiliation:
Philosophy, Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri

Abstract

Medical ethics has traditionally been governed by two guiding, but sometimes conflicting, principles—autonomy and benevolence. These principles provide the rationale for the two most commonly used standards for medical decisionmaking—the Substituted Judgment Standard shows our concern for autonomy, whereas the Best Interest Standard shows our commitment to benevolence. Both standards are vulnerable to criticisms. Further, the principles can seem to offer conflicting prescriptions for action. The criticisms and conflict figure prominently in discussion of advance directive decisionmaking and Alzheimer's disease. After laying out each of the current standards and its problems, with Alzheimer's issues as my central concern, I offer a new standard that avoids the problems while honoring our concerns for both autonomy and benevolence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)