Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:12:43.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Connexin-26 mutations in deafness and skin disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2009

Jack R. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Thomas W. White*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: Thomas W. White, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University Medical Center, T5-147, Basic Science Tower, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8661, USA. Tel: +1 631 444 9683; Fax: +1 631 444 3432; E-mail: thwhite@notes.cc.sunysb.edu

Abstract

Gap junctions allow the exchange of ions and small molecules between adjacent cells through intercellular channels formed by connexin proteins, which can also form functional hemichannels in nonjunctional membranes. Mutations in connexin genes cause a variety of human diseases. For example, mutations in GJB2, the gene encoding connexin-26 (Cx26), are not only a major cause of nonsyndromic deafness, but also cause syndromic deafness associated with skin disorders such as palmoplantar keratoderma, keratitis–ichthyosis deafness syndrome, Vohwinkel syndrome, hystrix–ichthyosis deafness syndrome and Bart–Pumphrey syndrome. The most common mutation in the Cx26 gene linked to nonsyndromic deafness is 35ΔG, a frameshift mutation leading to an early stop codon. The large number of deaf individuals homozygous for 35ΔG do not develop skin disease. Similarly, there is abundant experimental evidence to suggest that other Cx26 loss-of-function mutations cause deafness, but not skin disease. By contrast, Cx26 mutations that cause both skin diseases and deafness are all single amino acid changes. Since nonsyndromic deafness is predominantly a loss-of-function disorder, it follows that the syndromic mutants must show an alteration, or gain, of function to cause skin disease. Here, we summarise the functional consequences and clinical phenotypes resulting from Cx26 mutations that cause deafness and skin disease.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1Goodenough, D.A. and Paul, D.L. (2003) Beyond the gap: functions of unpaired connexon channels. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 4, 285-294Google Scholar
2Harris, A.L. (2001) Emerging issues of connexin channels: biophysics fills the gap. Quarterly Reviews in Biophysics 34, 325-472Google Scholar
3Jiang, J.X. and Gu, S. (2005) Gap junction- and hemichannel-independent actions of connexins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1711, 208-214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Saez, J.C. et al. (2005) Connexin-based gap junction hemichannels: gating mechanisms. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 1711, 215-224Google Scholar
5Sohl, G. et al. (2003) Expression profiles of the novel human connexin genes hCx30. 2, hCx40.1, and hCx62 differ from their putative mouse orthologues. Cell Communication and Adhesion 10, 27-36Google Scholar
6Santos-Sacchi, J. and Dallos, P. (1983) Intercellular communication in the supporting cells of the organ of Corti. Hearing Research 9, 317-326Google Scholar
7Zhao, H.B. et al. (2006) Gap junctions and cochlear homeostasis. Journal of Membrane Biology 209, 177-186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Jagger, D.J. and Forge, A. (2006) Compartmentalized and signal-selective gap junctional coupling in the hearing cochlea. Journal of Neuroscience 26, 1260-1268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Kikuchi, T. et al. (1994) Gap junction systems in the rat vestibular labyrinth: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Acta Otolaryngologica 114, 520-528CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Kikuchi, T. et al. (1995) Gap junctions in the rat cochlea: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Anatomy and Embryology 191, 101-118Google Scholar
11Johnstone, B.M. et al. (1989) Stimulus-related potassium changes in the organ of Corti of guinea-pig. Journal of Physiology 408, 77-92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Oesterle, E.C. and Dallos, P. (1990) Intracellular recordings from supporting cells in the guinea pig cochlea: DC potentials. Journal of Neurophysiology 64, 617-636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Kikuchi, T. et al. (2000) Gap junction systems in the mammalian cochlea. Brain Research Brain Research Reviews 32, 163-166Google Scholar
14Wangemann, P. (2002) K(+) cycling and its regulation in the cochlea and the vestibular labyrinth. Audiology and Neurootology 7, 199-205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Hibino, H. and Kurachi, Y. (2006) Molecular and physiological bases of the K+ circulation in the mammalian inner ear. Physiology 21, 336-345Google Scholar
16Schulte, B.A. and Adams, J.C. (1989) Distribution of immunoreactive Na+, K+-ATPase in gerbil cochlea. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 37, 127-134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Crouch, J.J. et al. (1997) Immunohistochemical localization of the Na-K-Cl co-transporter (NKCC1) in the gerbil inner ear. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 45, 773-778CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Bruzzone, R. and Cohen-Salmon, M. (2005) Hearing the messenger: Ins(1, 4, 5)P3 and deafness. Nature Cell Biology 7, 14-16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Beltramello, M. et al. (2005) Impaired permeability to Ins(1, 4, 5)P3 in a mutant connexin underlies recessive hereditary deafness. Nature Cell Biology 7, 63-69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Caputo, R. and Peluchetti, D. (1977) The junctions of normal human epidermis. A freeze-fracture study. Journal of Ultrastructure Reseach 61, 44-61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Risek, B. et al. (1992) Multiple gap junction genes are utilized during rat skin and hair development. Development 116, 639-651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Kam, E. et al. (1986) Patterns of junctional communication in skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 87, 748-753CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Salomon, D. et al. (1988) Cell-to-cell communication within intact human skin. Journal of Clinical Investigation 82, 248-254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Potten, C.S. (1981) Cell replacement in epidermis (keratopoiesis) via discrete units of proliferation. International Reviews in Cytology 69, 271-318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Kelsell, D.P. et al. (2000) Connexin mutations associated with palmoplantar keratoderma and profound deafness in a single family. European Journal of Human Genetics 8, 469-472Google Scholar
26Di, W.L. et al. (2001) Connexin 26 expression and mutation analysis in epidermal disease. Cell Communication and Adhesion 8, 415-418Google Scholar
27Mese, G. et al. (2007) Gap junctions: basic structure and function. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 127, 2516-2524CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Masgrau-Peya, E. et al. (1997) In vivo modulation of connexins 43 and 26 of human epidermis by topical retinoic acid treatment. Journal of Histochemisty and Cytochemistry 45, 1207-1215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Rivas, M.V. et al. (1997) Identification of aberrantly regulated genes in diseased skin using the cDNA differential display technique. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 108, 188-194Google Scholar
30Labarthe, M.P. et al. (1998) Upregulation of connexin 26 between keratinocytes of psoriatic lesions. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 111, 72-76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Lucke, T. et al. (1999) Upregulation of connexin 26 is a feature of keratinocyte differentiation in hyperproliferative epidermis, vaginal epithelium, and buccal epithelium. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 112, 354-361Google Scholar
32Goliger, J.A. and Paul, D.L. (1995) Wounding alters epidermal connexin expression and gap junction-mediated intercellular communication. Molecular Biology of the Cell 6, 1491-1501Google Scholar
33Sawey, M.J. et al. (1996) Perturbation in connexin 43 and connexin 26 gap-junction expression in mouse skin hyperplasia and neoplasia. Molecular Carcinogenesis 17, 49-613.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Smith, R.J. (2004) Clinical application of genetic testing for deafness. American Journal of Medical Genetics A 130A, 8-12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Apps, S.A. et al. (2007) Connexin 26 mutations in autosomal recessive deafness disorders: a review. International Journal of Audiology 46, 75-81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Tranebaerg, L. (2008) Genetics of congenital hearing impairment: a clinical approach. International Journal of Audiology 47, 535-545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37White, T.W. (2000) Functional analysis of human Cx26 mutations associated with deafness. Brain Res. Brain Research Reviews 32, 181-183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Bruzzone, R. et al. (2003) Loss-of-function and residual channel activity of connexin26 mutations associated with non-syndromic deafness. FEBS Letters 533, 79-88Google Scholar
39Kelsell, D.P. et al. (1997) Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature 387, 80-83Google Scholar
40Denoyelle, F. et al. (1998) Connexin 26 gene linked to a dominant deafness. Nature 393, 319-320Google Scholar
41Meyer, C.G. et al. (2002) Selection for deafness? Nature Medicine 8, 1332-1333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Man, Y.K. et al. (2007) A deafness-associated mutant human connexin 26 improves the epithelial barrier in vitro. Journal of Membrane Biology 218, 29-37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43d'Adamo, P. et al. (2009) Does epidermal thickening explain GJB2 high carrier frequency and heterozygote advantage? European Journal of Human Genetics 17, 284-286Google Scholar
44Yan, D. and Liu, X.Z. (2008) Cochlear molecules and hereditary deafness. Front Biosci. 13, 4972-4983CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Petit, C. et al. (2001) Molecular genetics of hearing loss. Annual Reviews in Genetics 35, 589-646Google Scholar
46Grifa, A. et al. (1999) Mutations in GJB6 cause nonsyndromic autosomal dominant deafness at DFNA3 locus. Nature Genetics 23, 16-18Google Scholar
47Xia, A. et al. (1999) Expression of connexin 26 and Na, K-ATPase in the developing mouse cochlear lateral wall: functional implications. Brain Research 846, 106-111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Petersen, M.B. and Willems, P.J. (2006) Non-syndromic, autosomal-recessive deafness. Clinical Genetics 69, 371-392Google Scholar
49Chang, E.H. et al. (2003) The role of connexins in human disease. Ear and Hearing 24, 314-323CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Guilford, P. et al. (1994) A non-syndrome form of neurosensory, recessive deafness maps to the pericentromeric region of chromosome 13q. Nature Genetics 6, 24-28Google Scholar
51del Castillo, I. et al. (2002) A deletion involving the connexin 30 gene in nonsyndromic hearing impairment. New England Journal of Medicine 346, 243-249Google Scholar
52Dai, P. et al. (2009) GJB2 mutation spectrum in 2, 063 Chinese patients with nonsyndromic hearing impairment. Journal of Translational Medicine 7, 26Google Scholar
53Rabionet, R. et al. (2000) Molecular genetics of hearing impairment due to mutations in gap junction genes encoding beta connexins. Human Mutation 16, 190-202Google Scholar
54Antoniadi, T. et al. (2000) Mutation analysis of the GJB2 (connexin 26) gene by DGGE in Greek patients with sensorineural deafness. Human Mutation 16, 7-12Google Scholar
55Alvarez, A. et al. (2005) High prevalence of the W24X mutation in the gene encoding connexin-26 (GJB2) in Spanish Romani (gypsies) with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. American Journal of Medical Genetics A 137A, 255-258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56Joseph, A.Y. and Rasool, T.J. (2009) High frequency of connexin26 (GJB2) mutations associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss in the population of Kerala, India. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 73, 437-443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Khandelwal, G. et al. (2009) High frequency of heterozygosity in GJB2 mutations among patients with non-syndromic hearing loss. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 123, 273-277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58Bouwer, S. et al. (2007) Carrier rates of the ancestral Indian W24X mutation in GJB2 in the general Gypsy population and individual subisolates. Genetic Testing 11, 455-458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Bors, A. et al. (2004) Frequencies of two common mutations (c. 35delG and c. 167delT) of the connexin 26 gene in different populations of Hungary. International Journal of Molecular Medicine 14, 1105-1108Google Scholar
60Dong, J. et al. (2001) Nonradioactive detection of the common Connexin 26 167delT and 35delG mutations and frequencies among Ashkenazi Jews. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 73, 160-163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61Lerer, I. et al. (2001) A deletion mutation in GJB6 cooperating with a GJB2 mutation in trans in non-syndromic deafness: A novel founder mutation in Ashkenazi Jews. Human Mutation 18, 460Google Scholar
62Dai, P. et al. (2007) The prevalence of the 235delC GJB2 mutation in a Chinese deaf population. Genetics in Medicine 9, 283-289Google Scholar
63Abe, S. et al. (2000) Prevalent connexin 26 gene (GJB2) mutations in Japanese. Journal of Medical Genetics 37, 41-43Google Scholar
64Yan, D. et al. (2003) Evidence of a founder effect for the 235delC mutation of GJB2 (connexin 26) in east Asians. Human Genetics. 114, 44-50Google Scholar
65Cryns, K. et al. (2004) A genotype-phenotype correlation for GJB2 (connexin 26) deafness. Journal of Medical Genetics 41, 147-154Google Scholar
66Oguchi, T. et al. (2005) Clinical features of patients with GJB2 (connexin 26) mutations: severity of hearing loss is correlated with genotypes and protein expression patterns. Journal of Human Genetics 50, 76-83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
67Picciotti, P.M. et al. (2009) Correlation between GJB2 mutations and audiological deficits: personal experience. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 266, 489-494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68Hilgert, N. et al. (2009) Phenotypic variability of patients homozygous for the GJB2 mutation 35delG cannot be explained by the influence of one major modifier gene. European Journal of Human Genetics 17, 517-524Google Scholar
69Angeli, S.I. (2008) Phenotype/genotype correlations in a DFNB1 cohort with ethnical diversity. Laryngoscope 118, 2014-2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70Hismi, B.O. et al. (2006) Effects of GJB2 genotypes on the audiological phenotype: variability is present for all genotypes. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 70, 1687-1694Google Scholar
71Lautermann, J. et al. (1998) Expression of the gap-junction connexins 26 and 30 in the rat cochlea. Cell and Tissue Research 294, 415-420Google Scholar
72Forge, A. et al. (1999) Gap junctions and connexin expression in the inner ear. Novartis Foundation Symposium 219, 134-150Google ScholarPubMed
73Xia, A.P. et al. (2000) Expression of connexin 31 in the developing mouse cochlea. Neuroreport 11, 2449-2453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74Ahmad, S. et al. (2003) Connexins 26 and 30 are co-assembled to form gap junctions in the cochlea of mice. Biochemistry and Biophysics Research Communications 307, 362-368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
75Kudo, T. et al. (2003) Transgenic expression of a dominant-negative connexin26 causes degeneration of the organ of Corti and non-syndromic deafness. Human Molecular Genetics 12, 995-1004Google Scholar
76Cohen-Salmon, M. et al. (2004) Expression of the connexin43- and connexin45-encoding genes in the developing and mature mouse inner ear. Cell and Tissue Research 316, 15-22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
77Zhao, H.B. (2005) Connexin26 is responsible for anionic molecule permeability in the cochlea for intercellular signalling and metabolic communications. European Journal of Neuroscience 21, 1859-1868Google Scholar
78Gerido, D.A. and White, T.W. (2004) Connexin disorders of the ear, skin, and lens. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1662, 159-170Google Scholar
79van Steensel, M.A. (2004) Gap junction diseases of the skin. American Journal of Medical Genetics C 131C, 12-19Google Scholar
80Richard, G. (2005) Connexin disorders of the skin. Clinical Dermatology 23, 23-32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
81Lai-Cheong, J.E. et al. (2007) Genetic diseases of junctions. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 127, 2713-2725Google Scholar
82Vohwinkel, K.H. (1929) Keratoma hereditarium mutilans. Archiv fur Dermatologie und Syphilis 158, 354-364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83Korge, B.P. et al. (1997) Loricrin mutation in Vohwinkel's keratoderma is unique to the variant with ichthyosis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 109, 604-610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
84Maestrini, E. et al. (1999) A missense mutation in connexin26, D66H, causes mutilating keratoderma with sensorineural deafness (Vohwinkel's syndrome) in three unrelated families. Human Molecular Genetics 8, 1237-1243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
85Maestrini, E. et al. (1996) A molecular defect in loricrin, the major component of the cornified cell envelope, underlies Vohwinkel's syndrome. Nature Genetics 13, 70-77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
86Peris, K. et al. (1995) Keratoderma hereditarium mutilans (Vohwinkel's syndrome) associated with congenital deaf-mutism. British Journal of Dermatology 132, 617-620Google Scholar
87Drummond, M. (1939) A case of unusual skin disease. Irish Journal of Medical Science 8, 85-86Google Scholar
88Bondeson, M.L. et al. (2006) Connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations in two Swedish patients with atypical Vohwinkel (mutilating keratoderma plus deafness) and KID syndrome both extensively treated with acitretin. Human Mutation 86, 503-508Google ScholarPubMed
89Snoeckx, R.L. et al. (2005) Mutation analysis of the GJB2 (connexin 26) gene in Egypt. Human Mutation 26, 60-61Google Scholar
90Richard, G. et al. (2004) Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of Cx26 disorders: Bart-Pumphrey syndrome is caused by a novel missense mutation in GJB2. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 123, 856-863Google Scholar
91Bart, R.S. and Pumphrey, R.E. (1967) Knuckle pads, leukonychia and deafness. A dominantly inherited syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 276, 202-207CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
92Ramer, J.C. et al. (1994) Familial leuconychia, knuckle pads, hearing loss, and palmoplantar hyperkeratosis: an additional family with Bart-Pumphrey syndrome. Journal of Medical Genetics 31, 68-71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
93Alexandrino, F. et al. (2005) G59S mutation in the GJB2 (connexin 26) gene in a patient with Bart-Pumphrey syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics A 136, 282-284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
94Heathcote, K. et al. (2000) A connexin 26 mutation causes a syndrome of sensorineural hearing loss and palmoplantar hyperkeratosis (MIM 148350). Journal of Medical Genetics 37, 50-51Google Scholar
95Leonard, N.J. et al. (2005) Sensorineural hearing loss, striate palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and knuckle pads in a patient with a novel connexin 26 (GJB2) mutation. Journal of Medical Genetics 42, e2Google Scholar
96Sharland, M. et al. (1992) Autosomal dominant palmoplantar hyperkeratosis and sensorineural deafness in three generations. Journal of Medical Genetics 29, 50-52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
97Verbov, J. (1987) Palmoplantar keratoderma, deafness and atopy. British Journal of Dermatology 116, 881-882CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
98Uyguner, O. et al. (2002) The novel R75Q mutation in the GJB2 gene causes autosomal dominant hearing loss and palmoplantar keratoderma in a Turkish family. Clinical Genetics 62, 306-309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
99Iossa, S. et al. (2009) New evidence for the correlation of the p. G130V mutation in the GJB2 gene and syndromic hearing loss with palmoplantar keratoderma. American Journal of Medical Genetics A 149A, 685-688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
100Richard, G. et al. (1998) Functional defects of Cx26 resulting from a heterozygous missense mutation in a family with dominant deaf-mutism and palmoplantar keratoderma. Human Genetics 103, 393-399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101Zwart-Storm, E.A. et al. (2008) A novel missense mutation in GJB2 disturbs gap junction protein transport and causes focal palmoplantar keratoderma with deafness. Journal of Medical Genetics 45, 161-166Google Scholar
102Akiyama, M. et al. (2007) A novel GJB2 mutation p. Asn54His in a patient with palmoplantar keratoderma, sensorineural hearing loss and knuckle pads. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 127, 1540-1543Google Scholar
103Zwart-Storm, E.A. et al. (2008) A novel missense mutation in the second extracellular domain of GJB2, p. Ser183Phe, causes a syndrome of focal palmoplantar keratoderma with deafness. American Journal of Pathology 173, 1113-1119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
104Grob, J.J. et al. (1987) Keratitis, ichthyosis, and deafness (KID) syndrome. Vertical transmission and death from multiple squamous cell carcinomas. Archives of Dermatology 123, 777-782CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
105Nazzaro, V. et al. (1990) Familial occurrence of KID (keratitis, ichthyosis, deafness) syndrome. Case reports of a mother and daughter. Journal of American Academy of Dermatology 23, 385-388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
106Szymko-Bennett, Y.M. et al. (2002) Auditory manifestations of Keratitis-Ichthyosis-Deafness (KID) syndrome. Laryngoscope 112, 272-280Google Scholar
107Janecke, A.R. et al. (2005) GJB2 mutations in keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome including its fatal form. American Journal of Medical Genetics A 133, 128-131Google Scholar
108Richard, G. et al. (2002) Missense mutations in GJB2 encoding connexin-26 cause the ectodermal dysplasia keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. American Journal of Human Genetics 70, 1341-1348Google Scholar
109van Steensel, M.A. et al. (2002) A novel connexin 26 mutation in a patient diagnosed with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 118, 724-727Google Scholar
110Gilliam, A. and Williams, M.L. (2002) Fatal septicemia in an infant with keratitis, ichthyosis, and deafness (KID) syndrome. Pediatric Dermatology 19, 232-236Google Scholar
111Griffith, A.J. et al. (2006) Cochleosaccular dysplasia associated with a connexin 26 mutation in keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. Laryngoscope 116, 1404-1408Google Scholar
112Jonard, L. et al. (2008) A familial case of Keratitis-Ichthyosis-Deafness (KID) syndrome with the GJB2 mutation G45E. European Journal of Medical Genetics 51, 35-43Google Scholar
113van Geel, M. et al. (2002) HID and KID syndromes are associated with the same connexin 26 mutation. British Journal of Dermatology 146, 938-942CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
114van Steensel, M.A. et al. (2004) A phenotype resembling the Clouston syndrome with deafness is associated with a novel missense GJB2 mutation. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 123, 291-293Google Scholar
115Mazereeuw-Hautier, J. et al. (2007) Keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: disease expression and spectrum of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations in 14 patients. British Journal of Dermatology 156, 1015-1019Google Scholar
116Montgomery, J.R. et al. (2004) A novel connexin 26 gene mutation associated with features of the keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome and the follicular occlusion triad. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 51, 377-382Google Scholar
117Stong, B.C. et al. (2006) A novel mechanism for connexin 26 mutation linked deafness: cell death caused by leaky gap junction hemichannels. Laryngoscope 116, 2205-2210Google Scholar
118Arita, K. et al. (2006) A novel N14Y mutation in Connexin26 in keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome: analyses of altered gap junctional communication and molecular structure of N terminus of mutated Connexin26. American Journal of Pathology 169, 416-423Google Scholar
119Yotsumoto, S. et al. (2003) Novel mutations in GJB2 encoding connexin-26 in Japanese patients with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness syndrome. British Journal of Dermatology 148, 649-653Google Scholar
120Schnyder, U.W. and Gloor, M. (1977) [Congenital bullous ichthyosiform erythroderma (case 20)]. Zeitschrift für Hautkrankheiten 52, 809-811Google Scholar
121Gulzow, J. and Anton-Lamprecht, I. (1977) [Ichthyosis hystrix gravior typus Rheydt: an otologic-dermatologic syndrome]. Laryngology Rhinology and Otology 56, 949-955Google ScholarPubMed
122Traupe, H. (1989) The Ichthyoses: A Guide to Clinical Diagnosis, Genetic Counseling, and Therapy, Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
123Konig, A. et al. (1997) Autosomal dominant inheritance of HID syndrome (hystrix-like ichthyosis with deafness). European Journal of Dermatology 7, 554-555Google Scholar
124Clark, G.M. (2008) Personal reflections on the multichannel cochlear implant and a view of the future. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 45, 651-693Google Scholar
125Tarabichi, M.B. et al. (2008) Deafness in the developing world: the place of cochlear implantation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 122, 877-880Google Scholar
126Barker, E.J. and Briggs, R.J. (2008) Cochlear implantation in children with keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness (KID) syndrome: outcomes in three cases. Cochlear Implants International 10, 166-173Google Scholar
127Hampton, S.M. et al. (1997) Cochlear implant extrusion in a child with keratitis, ichthyosis and deafness syndrome. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 111, 465-467Google Scholar
128Cushing, S.L. et al. (2008) Successful cochlear implantation in a child with Keratosis, Icthiosis and Deafness (KID) Syndrome and Dandy-Walker malformation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 72, 693-698Google Scholar
129Abdollahi, A. et al. (2007) KID syndrome. Dermatology Online Journal 13, 11Google Scholar
130Braun-Falco, M. (2009) Hereditary Palmoplantar Keratodermas. Journal of Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges.Google Scholar
131Maeda, Y. et al. (2005) In vitro and in vivo suppression of GJB2 expression by RNA interference. Human Molecular Genetics 14, 1641-1650CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
132Mani, R.S. et al. (2009) Functional consequences of novel connexin 26 mutations associated with hereditary hearing loss. European Journal of Human Genetics 17, 502-509Google Scholar
133Mese, G. et al. (2008) Connexin26 deafness associated mutations show altered permeability to large cationic molecules. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology 295, C966-C974Google Scholar
134Gerido, D.A. et al. (2007) Aberrant hemichannel properties of Cx26 mutations causing skin disease and deafness. American Journal of Physiology Cell Physiology 293, C337-C345Google Scholar
135Rouan, F. et al. (2001) trans-dominant inhibition of connexin-43 by mutant connexin-26: implications for dominant connexin disorders affecting epidermal differentiation. Journal of Cell Science 114, 2105-2113Google Scholar
136Bruzzone, R. et al. (2001) Functional analysis of a dominant mutation of human connexin26 associated with nonsyndromic deafness. Cell Communication and Adhesion 8, 425-431Google Scholar
137Richard, G. (2001) Connexin disorders of the skin. Advances in Dermatology 17, 243-277Google Scholar
138Marziano, N.K. et al. (2003) Mutations in the gene for connexin 26 (GJB2) that cause hearing loss have a dominant negative effect on connexin 30. Human Molecular Genetics 12, 805-812Google Scholar
139Thomas, T. et al. (2004) Functional domain mapping and selective trans-dominant effects exhibited by Cx26 disease-causing mutations. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 19157-19168Google Scholar
140Bakirtzis, G. et al. (2003) Targeted epidermal expression of mutant Connexin 26(D66H) mimics true Vohwinkel syndrome and provides a model for the pathogenesis of dominant connexin disorders. Human Molecular Genetics 12, 1737-1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
141Matos, T.D. et al. (2008) A novel M163L mutation in connexin 26 causing cell death and associated with autosomal dominant hearing loss. Hearing Research 240, 87-92Google Scholar
142Bennett, M.V. et al. (2003) New roles for astrocytes: gap junction hemichannels have something to communicate. Trends in Neuroscience 26, 610-617Google Scholar
143Lee, J.R. et al. (2009) Connexin mutations causing skin disease and deafness increase hemichannel activity and cell death when expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 129, 870-878CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
144Cohen-Salmon, M. et al. (2002) Targeted ablation of connexin26 in the inner ear epithelial gap junction network causes hearing impairment and cell death. Current Biology 12, 1106-1111Google Scholar
145Wang, Y. et al. (2009) Targeted connexin26 ablation arrests postnatal development of the organ of Corti. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 385, 33-37Google Scholar
146Brown, C.W. et al. (2003) A novel GJB2 (connexin 26) mutation, F142L, in a patient with unusual mucocutaneous findings and deafness. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 121, 1221-1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
147Thomas, T. et al. (2003) Transport and function of cx26 mutants involved in skin and deafness disorders. Cell Communication and Adhesion 10, 353-358Google Scholar
148Forge, A. et al. (2003) Gap junctions in the inner ear: comparison of distribution patterns in different vertebrates and assessement of connexin composition in mammals. Journal of Comparative Neurology 467, 207-231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
149Chen, Y. et al. (2005) Mechanism of the defect in gap-junctional communication by expression of a connexin 26 mutant associated with dominant deafness. FASEB Journal 19, 1516-1518Google Scholar
150Maeda, S. et al. (2009) Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution. Nature 458, 597-602Google Scholar

Further reading, resources and contacts

The connexin deafness homepage covers the roles and mutations associated with different connexin genes/proteins associated with hearing loss: