a1 School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia. e.bavin@latrobe.edu.au http://www.latrobe.edu.au/psy/staff/bavine.html
Abstract
Evans & Levinson (E&L) argue against Universal Grammar on the basis of language diversity. A related and fundamental issue is whether the language input provides sufficient information for a child to acquire it. I briefly discuss the more integrated approaches to language acquisition which focus on the mechanisms, and research showing that input cues provide valuable information for the language learner.
Related Articles