Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T23:11:00.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OPTIMALITY THEORY, PHONOLOGICAL ACQUISITION AND DISORDERS. Daniel A. Dinnsen and Judith A. Gierut (Eds.). London: Equinox, 2008. Pp. xiii + 513.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Karen Jesney*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archibald, J., & Vanderweide, T. (1997). Second language syllable structure: Phonological government and typological universals. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 19, 2343.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Levelt, C. (2003). Optimality Theory and phonological acquisition. Annual Review of Phonological Acquisition, 3, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R., Elreyes, A., & Iverson, G. K. (2003). Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research, 19, 169208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R., Pater, J., & Zonneveld, W. (Eds.). (2004). Fixing priorities: Constraints in phonological acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesar, B., & Smolensky, P. (1998). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 229268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar