Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T13:31:40.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corn gluten meal—a natural preemergence herbicide: Effect on vegetable seedling survival and weed cover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Melissa C. McDade
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Horticulture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
Nick E. Christians*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticulture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
*
Corresponding author is N.E. Christians (nchris@iastate.edu).
Get access

Abstract

Weeds are considered the most important pest group for farmers interested in lowering external inputs and avoiding synthetic chemical use. Corn gluten meal (CGM) is a natural preemergence weed control used in turfgrass, which reduces germination of many broadleaf and grass weeds. The objective of this study was to investigate weed cover and vegetable seedling survival in field plots when CGM is incorporated before planting. Three studies were conducted, with three replications for each study. Five rates of powdered CGM (0,100, 200, 300, and 400 g m–2) were weighed and incorporated into the top 5–8 cm of soil in recently disked 1.5-m by 2.7-m plots. Seeds of eight vegetables were each planted in rows 1.4 m long and 0.3 m apart. Seedling survival and percentage of weed cover were recorded for each plot. Corn gluten meal at rates of 100, 200, 300, and 400 g m–2 reduced mean weed cover by 50, 74, 84, and 82%, respectively, compared with the control. Seedling survival at 100 g CGM per m2 was reduced by 67% for ‘Comanche’ onion, 35% for ‘Ruby Queen’ beet, 41% for ‘Red Baron’ radish, 71% for ‘Provider’ bean, 73% for ‘Scarlet Nantes’ carrot, 59% for ‘Maestro’ pea, and 68% for ‘Black Seeded Simpson’ lettuce, compared with the control. Seedling survival for ‘Daybreak’ sweet corn was not reduced by rates of 100 or 200 g CGM per m2, but was reduced by 26% at a rate of 300 g CGM per m2 compared with the control. Because of the reduction in seedling survival at even the lowest rate of CGM (100 g m–2), direct seeding of these vegetables into soil into which CGM has been incorporated is not advisable. Using transplants may be an alternative that takes advantage of the herbicidal effects of CGM and the nitrogen it provides.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bingaman, B.R., and Christians, N.E.. 1995. Greenhouse screening of corn gluten meal as a natural control product for broadleaf and grass weeds. HortScience 30:12561259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Christians, N.E. 1993. The use of corn gluten meal as a natural preemergence weed control in turf. Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 7:284290.Google Scholar
3.Grubinger, V.P. 1992. Organic vegetable production and how it relates to LISA. HortScience 27:759760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Kelly, T.C., Lu, Y.-C., Abdul-Baki, A.A., and Teasdale, J.R.. 1995. Economics of a hairy vetch mulch system for producing fresh-market tomatoes in the mid-Atlantic region. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:854860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kelly, W.C. 1990. Minimal use of synthetic fertilizers in vegetable production. HortScience 25:168169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.McDade, M.C. 1999. Corn gluten meal and corn gluten hydrolysate for weed control. M.S. thesis. Iowa State University, Dept. of Horticulture, Ames.Google Scholar
7.Nonnecke, G.R., and Christians, N.E.. 1993. Evaluation of corn gluten meal as a natural, weed control product in strawberry. Acta Hort. 348:315320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Peacock, L., and Norton, G.A.. 1990. A critical analysis of organic vegetable crop protection in the U.K. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 31:187197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Putnam, A.R. 1990. Vegetable weed control with minimal herbicide inputs. HortScience 25:155159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.SAS Institute. 1996. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Vers. 6.12. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
11.Wallace, R.W., and Bellinder, R.R.. 1992. Alternative tillage and herbicide options for successful weed control in vegetables. HortScience 27:745749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar