Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:03:32.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The potential for regenerative agriculture in the developing world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2009

Charles A. Francis ,
Richard R. Harwood  and
James F. Parr
Charles A. Francis
Affiliation:
Professor of Agronomy and Extension Crops Specialist, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583.
Richard R. Harwood
Affiliation:
Program Officer and Agronomist, Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development, Morrilton, AR 72110.
James F. Parr
Affiliation:
National Program Leader, Dryland Agriculture and Soil Fertility, ARS-USDA, and Coordinator, Dryland Agriculture Project, ARS-USDA/USAID, Beltsville, MD 20705.
Get access

Abstract

Increased food production and greater income for farm families are primary goals of agricultural development in the Third World. Most strategies to achieve these goals are unrealistic in assuming that limited resource farmers can move out of basic food production in multiple cropping systems to high-technology monocropping for export. These strategies are based on petroleum-based inputs that demand scarce foreign exchange. They may include excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which adds unnecessary production costs, endangers the farm family, and degrades the rural environment. Dependence on export crops and world markets is economically tenuous, especially for the small farmer. Future agricultural production systems can be designed to take better advantage of production resources found on the farm. Enhanced nitrogen fixation, greater total organic matter production, integrated pest management, genetic tolerance to pests and to stress conditions, and higher levels of biological activity all contribute to resource use efficiency. Appropriate information and management skills substituted for expensive inputs can further improve resource use efficiency. On the whole farm level, appropriate cropping on each field can be integrated with animal enterprises, leading to a highly structured and efficient system. Such systems can serve the needs of national agricultural sector planners, who in many countries are concerned with increased self-reliance in farming inputs and in production of basic food commodities. This includes a realistic focus on training of local development specialists, increased research on food crops under limited resource conditions, and providing information, incentives, and appropriate technologies for operators of both large and small farms. Well-conceived national plans include varied food production strategies and options for farmers with different resource levels.

Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Spring 1986 , pp. 65 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Akobundo, I. O. (ed.) 1980. Weed control strategies for multiple cropping systems of the humid and subhumid tropics. In: Weeds and The Control in the Humid and Subhumid Tropics. International Inst. Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
2.Alexander, M. 1984. Nitrogen fixation. Report on Technology Application through the Year 2000. Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3.Altieri, M. A., Francis, C. A., Van Schoonhaven, A., and Doll, J. D.. 1978. A review of insect prevalence in maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cropping systems. Field Crops Res. 1:33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M.. 1986. Insect, weed, and plant disease management in multiple cropping systems. In: Multiple Cropping Systems, Francis, C. A. (ed.), Macmillan Publ. Co., New York, NY. Chapter 9.Google Scholar
5.Barker, T. C. and Francis, C. A.. 1986. Agronomic aspects of multiple cropping. In: Multiple Cropping Systems, Francis, C. A. (ed.), Macmillan Publ. Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
6.Boeringa, R. 1980. Alternative methods of agriculture: Description, evaluation and recommendations for research. Agric. Environm. 5:1–199.Google Scholar
7.Brown, L. R. 1986. State of the world, 1986. World-watch Institute, W. W. Norton & Co., New York, NY. 263 pp.Google Scholar
8.Culik, M., McAllister, J. C., Palada, M. C., and Rieger, S.. 1983. The Kutztown Farm Report. Rodale Research Center, Emmaus, PA. 55 pp.Google Scholar
9.Dalal, R. C. 1974. Effects of intercropping maize with pigeon pea on grain yield and nutrient uptake. Exp. Agr. 10:219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Edens, T. C. and Haynes, D. C.. 1982. Closed system agriculture: Resource constraints, management options, and design alternatives. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 20:363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Food and Agriculture Organization. 1975. Organic materials as fertilizers. Soils Bulletin No. 27. FAO, United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
12.Francis, C. A. 1981. Rationality of decisions by small farmers. Farming Systems Research Conference, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
13.Francis, C. A. (ed.) 1986. Multiple Cropping Systems. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
14.Francis, C. A. and Harwood, R. R.. 1985. Enough Food. Special Publ., Rodale Press and Regenerative Agriculture Association, Emmaus, PA.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Francis, C. A. and Sanders, J. H.. 1978. Economic analysis of bean and maize systems: Monoculture versus associated cropping. Field Crops Res. 1:319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Gabel, M. 1979. Ho-Ping: A world scenario for food production. World Game Institute, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
17.Gliessman, S. R. 1980. Multiple cropping systems: A basis for developing an alternative agriculture. In: Workshop on Innovative Biological Technologies for Lesser Developed Countries, Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
18.Gonsalves, J. F. 1982. Trainer's guide to small-scale biointensive food production: The French intensive biodynamic method. Dept. of Agricultural Education and Extension, Univ. Dar-es-Salaam, Morogoro, Tanzania.Google Scholar
19.Hallberg, G. 1984. Agricultural chemicals and groundwater quality in Iowa. Bulletin No. CE-2081J. Coop. Extension Serv., Iowa State Univ., Ames IA.Google Scholar
21.Harwood, R. R. 1983. International overview of regenerative agriculture. In: Resource-Efficient Farming Methods for Tanzania. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
22.Harwood, R. R. 1984a. Organic farming research at the Rodale Research Center. In: Organic Farming: Current Technology and Its Role in Sustainable Agriculture. Bezdicek, D. F. (ed.) Spec. Publ. No. 46, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
23.Harwood, R. R. 1984b. The integration efficiences of cropping systems. In: Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems. Michigan State Univ. Press, E. Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
24.Harwood, R. R. and Madden, J. P.. 1982. Research agenda for the transition to a regenerative food system: Food production. Cornucopia Project, Regenerative Agriculture Assoc., Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
25.Heichel, G. H. 1973. Comparative efficiency of energy use in crop production. Connecticut Agr. Exper. Station Bulletin No. 739, 26 pp.Google Scholar
26.Heichel, G. H. and Barnes, D. K.. 1984. Opportunities for meeting crop nitrogen needs from symbiotic nitrogen fixation. In: Organic Fanning: Current Technology and Its Role in Sustainable Agriculture. Bezdicek, D. F. (ed.) Spec. Publ. No. 46, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
27.Howard, A. 1947. The soil and health: A study of organic agriculture. Devin-Adair, New York, NY. 196 pp.Google Scholar
28.Jain, H. K. 1985. Agriculture of tomorrow — greater productivity, efficiency, and diversity, pp. 327–337. In: Biotechnology in International Agricultural Research, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
29.Kaffka, S. 1984. Dairy farm management and energy use efficiency. A case study with comparisons. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY. 113 pp.Google Scholar
30.Karel, A. K., Quentin, M. E., and Matthews, D. L.. 1983. Alternatives to the conventional use of chemical pesticides. In: Workshop on Resource-efficient Farming Methods for Tanzania, Morogoro, Tanzania. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
31.Keya, N. C. O. 1974. Grass/legume pastures in western Kenya. Legume Performance at Kitale, Kisii, and Kakamega. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 39:247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Kock, W. 1982. Principles and technologies of sustainable agriculture in tropical areas: A preliminary assessment. World Bank Report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
33.La Rue, T. A. and Patterson, T. G.. 1981. How much nitrogen do legumes fix? Adv. in Agron. 34:15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Liebhardt, W. C. 1983. Nitrogen self-sufficiency. In: Workshop on Resource-efficient Farming Methods for Tanzania, Morogoro, Tanzania. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
35.Liebhardt, W. C., Francis, C. A., and Sands, M.. 1985. Research needs for the development of resource efficient technologies. In: Workshop on Regenerative Fanning Systems. Rodale Institute, presented to USAID, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
36.Luckmann, W. H. and Metcalf, R. L.. 1975. Introduction to insect pest management. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
37.MacDonald, L. H. 1982. Agro-forestry in the African humid tropics. In: Proceedings Workshop at Ibadan, Nigeria, May, 1981. United Nations Univ., NRTS-17-UNUP-364.Google Scholar
38.Maher, D. 1982. The applicability of organic agriculture to the immediate and long-term needs of the Arusha region, Tanzania. Development Alternatives Inc. Report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
39.Minjas, A. N. 1978. Weed problems and control practices in Tanzania. International Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
40.Minjas, A. N. and Jana, R. K.. 1983. Weed control. In: Workshop on Resource-efficient Farming Methods for Tanzania, Morogoro, Tanzania. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
41.Motyka, G. and Edens, T.. 1984. A comparison of heterogeneity and abundance of pests and beneficials across a spectrum of chemical and cultural controls. Pest Mgt. Tech. Rept. #41, Dept. of Entomology, Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
42.Ngaiza, E. M. 1983. Manure and compost handling in Tanzania. In: Workshop on Resource-efficient Fanning Methods for Tanzania, Morogoro, Tanzania. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
43.Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1984. Africa Tomorrow: Issues in technology, agriculture, and U.S. foreign aid — a technical memorandum. U.S. Congress, OTA-TM-F-31. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
44.Osiru, D. S. O. and Willey, R. W.. 1972. Studies on mixtures of dwarf sorghum and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 70:531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Parr, J. F. and Papendick, R. I.. 1983. Strategies for improving soil productivity in developing countries with organic wastes, pp. 131–143. In: Environmentally Sound Agriculture. Lockeretz, W. (ed.) Praeger Scientific Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
46.Parr, J. F., Papendick, R. I., and Youngberg, I. G.. 1983. Organic farming in the United States: Principles and perspectives. Agroecosystems 8:183–201.Google Scholar
47.Patten, A. G. W. 1982. Comparison of nitrogen and phosphorus flows on an organic and conventional farm. M.S. Thesis, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA.Google Scholar
48.Pimental, D., Berardi, G., and Fast, S.. 1983. Energy efficiency of farming systems: Organic and conventional agriculture. Agric. Ecosystems, and Environ. 9:359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Rao, M. R. and Willey, R. W.. 1980. Evaluation of yield stability in intercropping: Studies with sorghum/pigeonpea. Expl. Agric. 16:105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50.Rodale, R. 1983. Breaking new ground. The search for sustainable agriculture. The Futurist 17(1):15–20.Google Scholar
51.Rodale, R. 1985. Internal resources and external in puts — the two sources of all production needs. In: Workshop on Regenerative Farming Systems. Rodale Institute, presented to USAID, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
52.Sanchez, P. A. 1976. Properties and management of soils in the tropics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
53.Samoka, J. M. R., Ndunguru, B. J., and Liebhardt, W. C.. 1983. Agronomic aspects of manure and compost use. In: Workshop on Resource-efficient Farming Methods for Tanzania, Morogoro, Tanzania. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
54.Smith, M. E. and Francis, C. A.. 1986. Breeding for multiple cropping systems, pp. 219–249. In: Multiple Cropping Systems. Francis, C. A. (ed.) Macmillan Publ. Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
55.Timberlake, L. 1985. Africa in crisis: The causes, the cures of environmental bankruptcy. Earthscan, International Institute for Environment and Development, Washington, DC. Russell Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
56.Urban, F. and Vollrath, T.. 1984. Patterns and trends in world agricultural land use. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
57.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Improving soils with organic wastes. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 157 pp.Google Scholar
58.U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Report and recommendations on organic farming. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 94 pp.Google Scholar
59.Vogtmann, H. 1984. Making nitrogen with organic cropping systems, pp. 16–18. New Farmer and Grower (Spring).Google Scholar
60.Walker, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A.. 1982. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci. supplement 30:17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61.Wegrzyn, V. A. 1984. Nitrogen fertility management in corn — a case study on a mixed crop livestock farm in Pennsylvania. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA. 158 pp.Google Scholar
62.Willey, R. W. and Osiru, D. S. O.. 1972. Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 79:517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63.Willson, G. B., Parr, J. F., Epstein, E., Marsh, P. B., Chaney, R. L., Colacicco, D., Burge, W. D., Sikora, L. J., Tester, C. F., and Hornick, S. B.. 1980. Manual for composting sewage sludge by the Beltsville aerated pile method. EPA-600/8-80-22. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 65 pp.Google Scholar
64.Wortman, S. and Cummings, R. G. 1978. To Feed this World: The Challenge and the Strategy. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
65.Youngberg, I. G. 1984. Alternative agriculture in the United States: Ideology, politics and prospects. In: Alternatives in Food Production. Knorr, D. W. and Watkins, T. R. (eds.) Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
66.Youngberg, I. G., Parr, J. F., and Papendick, R. I.. 1984. Potential benefits of organic farming practices for wildlife and natural resources. Trans. North Amer. Wildlife and Natural Res. Conf. 49:141–153.Google Scholar