Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T20:23:02.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freak wave statistics on collinear currents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

KARINA B. HJELMERVIK  and
KARSTEN TRULSEN
KARINA B. HJELMERVIK
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1053 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
KARSTEN TRULSEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1053 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway
*
†Email address for correspondence: karstent@math.uio.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Linear refraction of waves on inhomogeneous current is known to provoke extreme waves. We investigate the effect of nonlinearity on this phenomenon, with respect to the variation of significant wave height, kurtosis and occurrence of freak waves. Monte Carlo simulations are performed employing a modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation that includes the effects of a prescribed non-potential current. We recommend that freak waves should be defined by a local criterion according to the wave distribution at each location of constant current, not by a global criterion that is either averaged over, or insensitive to, inhomogeneities of the current. Nonlinearity can reduce the modulation of significant wave height. Depending on the configuration of current and waves, the kurtosis and probability of freak waves can either grow or decrease when the wave height increases due to linear refraction. At the centre of an opposing current jet where waves are known to become large, we find that freak waves should be more rare than in the open ocean away from currents. The largest amount of freak waves on an opposing current jet is found at the jet sides where the significant wave height is small.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 637 , 25 October 2009 , pp. 267 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bottin, R. R. Jr., & Thompson, E. F. 2002 Comparisons of physical and numerical model wave predictions with prototype data at Morro Bay harbor entrance, ERDC/CHL CHETN I-65, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.Google Scholar
Dysthe, K. B. 1979 Note on the modification to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation for application to deep water waves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 369, 105–114.Google Scholar
Dysthe, K. B., Krogstad, H. E. & Müller, P. 2008 Oceanic rogue waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, M. 1987 The Benjamin–Feir instability of a deep water Stokes wavepacket in the presence of a non-uniform medium. J. Fluid Mech. 176, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, F. I. 1984 A case study of wave–current-bathymetry interactions at the Columbia river entrance. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 14, 1065–1078.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramstad, O. & Trulsen, K. 2007 Influence of crest and group length on the occurrence of freak waves. J. Fluid Mech. 582, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjelmervik, K., Ommundsen, A. & Gjevik, B. 2005 Implementation of non-linear advection terms in a high resolution tidal model. University of Oslo, Preprint.Google Scholar
Hjelmervik, K. & Trulsen, K. 2009 The current modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation which allows vorticity. University of Oslo, Preprint.Google Scholar
Jonsson, I. G. 1990 Wave–current interactions. In The Sea: Ocean Engineering Science (ed. Le Mhaut, B. & Hanes, D. M.), pp. 65–120. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Kharif, C. & Pelinovsky, E. 2003 Physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 22, 603–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavrenov, I. V. 1998 The wave energy concentration at the Agulhas current off South Africa. Nat. Hazards 17, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavrenov, I. V. & Porubov, A. V. 2006 Three reasons for freak wave generation in the non-uniform current. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 25, 574–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, E. Y. & Mei, C. C. 1985 A numerical study of water–wave modulation based on a higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Fluid Mech. 150, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Stewart, R. W. 1961 The changes in amplitude of short gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 529–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIver, R. D., Simons, R. R. & Thomas, G. P. 2006 Gravity waves interacting with narrow jet-like current. J. Geophys. Res. 111, C03009.Google Scholar
MacMahan, J. H., Thornton, E. B. & Reniers, A. J. H. M. 2006 Rip current review. Coast. Engng 53, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, C. C. 1989 The Applied Dynamics of Ocean Surface Waves. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Mori, N., Liu, P. C. & Yasuda, T. 2002 Analysis of freak wave measurements in the sea of Japan. Ocean Engng 29, 1399–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muslu, G. M. & Erbay, H. A. 2004 Higher-order split-step Fourier schemes for the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Math. Comput. Simul. 67, 581–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onorato, M., Osborne, A. R., Serio, M., Resio, D., Pushkarev, A., Zakharov, V. E. & Brandini, C.Freely decaying weak turbulence for sea surface gravity waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 144501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. 1976 Interaction of water waves and currents. Adv. Appl. Mech. 16, 9–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peregrine, D. H. & Smith, R. 1979 Nonlinear effects upon waves near caustics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 292, 341–370.Google Scholar
Socquet-Juglard, H., Dysthe, K. B., Trulsen, K., Krogstad, H. E. & Liu, J. 2005 Probability distributions of surface gravity waves during spectral changes. J. Fluid. Mech. 542 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1977 On the resonant interaction between a surface wave and a weak surface current. Mathematika 24, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, J. D. & Peregrine, D. H. 1999 The current-modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation. J. Fluid Mech. 399, 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayfun, M. A. 1980 Narrow-band nonlinear sea waves. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 1548–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trulsen, K. & Dysthe, K. B. 1996 A modified nonlinear Schrödinger equation for broader bandwidth gravity waves on deep water. Wave Motion 24, 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turpin, F.-M., Benmoussa, C. & Mei, C. C. 1983 Efects of slowly varying depth and current on the evolution of a Stokes wavepacket. J. Fluid Mech. 132, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B. S. & Fornberg, B. 1998 On the chance of freak waves at sea. J. Fluid Mech. 335, 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B. S. 1999 Wave action on currents with vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 386, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C. H. & Yao, A. 2004 Laboratory measurements of limiting freak waves on currents. J. Geophys. Res. 109, C12002.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V. E. 1968 Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 9, 86–94.Google Scholar