Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T19:40:18.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Empirical Evidence on the Determinants of Trade Credit at the Industry Level of Aggregation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Anthony F. Herbst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The results obtained for accounts payable contrast with those for accounts receivable. With receivables, it appears that the level is determined more or less automatically by sales, linear trend, and season of the year. In the case of payables, it seems that trend and season are unimportant, and that the level of payables is determined instead by not only the level of purchases, but by capital requirements. Further, the current obligation on bank term-loans plays an important role in determining the response of payables to the need for working capital.

However, it was shown that fairly simple models are sufficient to account for most of the variance in accounts payable. Although it was anticipated that monetary variables would be significant for accounts payable, this was not borne out. As for accounts receivable, most of the variance in accounts payable for the Lumber and Wood Products Industry can be associated with microeconomic (i.e., industry variables) and time variables alone.

Several tentative conclusions concerning trade credit in the Lumber and Wood Products Industry may be listed:

1. Receivables can be accounted for almost entirely by sales, trend, or season.

2. Payables are not directly influenced by trend or season.

3. The direct influences of money supply and interest rates on accounts payable are not significant.

4. The effect of working capital on payables is adequately captured by treating current assets and current liabilities as separate independent variables.

5. The current obligation on long-term bank loans is more important in determining the level of payables than are short-term bank loans or the level of long-term debt.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , June 1974 , pp. 377 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bates, T.The Financing of Small Business. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1964.Google Scholar
[2]Brechling, F., and Lipsey, R.. “Trade Credit and Monetary Policy.” Economic Journal, vol. 73 (December 1963), pp. 619–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Christ, Carl F.Econometric Models and Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[4]Credit Research Foundation, Inc. Suggestions for Studies in the Economics of Trade Credit. Lake Success, N.Y.: Credit Research Foundation, Inc., 1969, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
[5]Friedland, Seymour. The Economics of Corporate Finance. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[6]Goldberger, Arthur. Econometric Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1964.Google Scholar
[7]Johnson, Robert W.Financial Management, 3rd ed.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[8]Johnston, T.Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1963.Google Scholar
[9]Junk, P. “Monetary Policy and the Extension of Trade Credit.” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 30 (January 1954), pp. 274–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kenny, J.F., and Keeping, E.S.. Mathematics of Statistics. 2nd ed., vols. 1 and 2. New York: D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., 1951.Google Scholar
[11]Laffer, Arthur B. “Trade Credit and the Money Market.” Journal of Political Economy, march–April 1970, pp. 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mead, Walter J.Competition and Oligopsony in the Douglas Fir Lumber Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Meltzer, A.H. “Mercantile Credit, Monetary Policy and the Size of Firms.” Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 42 (November 1960), pp. 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Nadiri, M.I. “The Determinants of Trade Credit in the U.S. Total Manufacturing Sector.” Econometrica, vol. 37 (July 1969), pp. 408–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Robinson, Roland I.Financing the Dynamic Small Firm. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[16]U.S. Bureau of the Budget. Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1967.Google Scholar
[17]U.S. Department of Commerce. 1967 Business Statistics: The Biennial Supplement to the Survey of Current Business, vol. 16, 1967.Google Scholar
[18]U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission. Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing Corporations.Google Scholar
[19]Weston, J. Fred.Managerial Finance. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1962.Google Scholar
[20]Zaremba, Joseph. Economics of the American Lumber Industry. New York: Robert Speller & Sons, Publishers, 1963.Google Scholar
[21]Zivnuska, John W.U.S. Timber Resources in a World Economy. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, Inc., 1967.Google Scholar