Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:52:35.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Practice on castration of piglets in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2009

B. Fredriksen*
Affiliation:
Animalia Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, P.O. 396, Økern, 0513 Oslo, Norway
M. Font i Furnols
Affiliation:
IRTA-Food Technology, Finca Camps i Armet, 17121 Monells, Spain
K. Lundström
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Box 7051, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
W. Migdal
Affiliation:
Faculty of Food Technology, Department of Animal Product Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, ul. Balicka 122, 30-149 Krakow, Poland
A. Prunier
Affiliation:
French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), UMR 1079 INRA-Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
F. A. M. Tuyttens
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
M. Bonneau
Affiliation:
French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), UMR 1079 INRA-Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint Gilles, France
Get access

Abstract

PIGCAS (Attitudes, practices and state of the art regarding piglet castration in Europe) is to our knowledge the first project that has focused on castration practice across European countries (European Union minus Bulgaria, Malta and Romania, plus Norway and Switzerland). About 250 million pigs are slaughtered in Europe each year. Of the 125 million male pigs, approximately 20% are left entire, less than 3% are castrated with anaesthesia and the rest is castrated without anaesthesia. The study identified large variations in castration procedures, both within and between countries. In females, castration is very rare, but is practiced without anaesthesia in special breeds/production systems in some of the southern countries.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

von Borell, EB, Baumgartner, J, Giersing, M, Jäggin, N, Prunier, A, Tuyttens, FAM, Edwards, SA 2009. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal (in press).Google Scholar
Campbell, RG 2007. Improving the eating quality of pork: an Australian perspective. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Langford Food Industry Conference, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, 23–24 May 2007, pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
European Community 2001. Council Directive 2001/93/EC, amending Council Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Official Journal L 316 (1 December 2001), pp. 36–38.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2004. Welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. Scientific Report of the Scientific Panel for Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the commission related to welfare aspects of the castration of piglets. EFSA – AHAW/04–087, Parma, Italy.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, B, Lundström, K, Migdal, W, Prunier, A, Tuyttens, F, Bonneau, M 2008. Assessment of the extent of the practice of castration and how it is performed in different European countries. Report of PIGCAS WP2: Practice. PIGCAS Project, Sine Loco.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, B, Nafstad, O 2006. Surveyed attitudes, perceptions and practices in Norway regarding the use of local anaesthesia in piglet castration. Research in Veterinary Science 81, 293295.Google Scholar
Jäggin, N, Gerber, S, Schatzmann, U 2006. General anaesthesia, analgesia and pain associated with the castration of newborn piglets. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 48 (suppl. 1), 2730. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-48-S1-S12.Google Scholar
Norwegian Ministry of Agriculture and Food 2002. Law-2002-04-19-11: Animal Welfare Act. Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Norwegian Ministry of Agriculture and Food 2003. Regulation 2003-02-18 nr 175: Regulations on Housing of Swine. Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Bonneau, M, von Borell, EB, Cinotti, S, Gunn, M, Fredriksen, B, Giersing, M, Morton, DB, Tuyttens, FAM, Velarde, A 2006. A review of the welfare consequences of surgical castration in piglets and evaluation of non-surgical methods. Animal Welfare 15, 277289.Google Scholar
Spoolder, HAM, Baltussen, WHM 2008. PIGCAS Stakeholder Congress. Research Report 103, pp. 138. Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Taylor, AA, Weary, DM 2000. Vocal responses of piglets to castration: identifying procedural sources of pain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70, 1726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed