Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Cumella, Stuart
2008.
New Public Management and Public Services for People With an Intellectual Disability: A Review of the Implementation of Valuing People in England.
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 3,
p.
178.
Fernandez, Jose-Luis
and
Forder, J.
2008.
Consequences of local variations in social care on the performance of the acute health care sector.
Applied Economics,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 12,
p.
1503.
Lund, Brian
2008.
Major, Blair and the Third Way in Social Policy.
Social Policy & Administration,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
NEWMAN, JANET
GLENDINNING, CAROLINE
and
HUGHES, MICHAEL
2008.
Beyond Modernisation? Social Care and the Transformation of Welfare Governance.
Journal of Social Policy,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
531.
Glendinning, Caroline
2008.
Increasing Choice and Control for Older and Disabled People: A Critical Review of New Developments in England.
Social Policy & Administration,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 5,
p.
451.
Hall, Edward
2009.
Being in Control: Personal Budgets and the New Landscape of Care for People with Learning Disabilities.
Mental Health Review Journal,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
44.
POWER, ANDREW
2009.
Spatial Perspectives on Voluntarism in Learning Disability Services in Ireland.
Journal of Social Policy,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 2,
p.
299.
김보영
2009.
Analysis of Policy Approach in Social Service Reforms by New Labour in Britain.
Social Welfare Policy,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
127.
Rabiee, P.
Moran, N.
and
Glendinning, C.
2009.
Individual Budgets: Lessons from Early Users' Experiences.
British Journal of Social Work,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 5,
p.
918.
Jones, Karen
and
Netten, Ann
2009.
The costs of change: a case study of the process of implementing individual budgets across pilot local authorities in England.
Health & Social Care in the Community,
Malley, Juliette
and
Fernández, José‐Luis
2010.
MEASURING QUALITY IN SOCIAL CARE SERVICES: THEORY AND PRACTICE.
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,
Vol. 81,
Issue. 4,
p.
559.
Brown, L.
2010.
Balancing Risk and Innovation to Improve Social Work Practice.
British Journal of Social Work,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 4,
p.
1211.
Boyle, Geraldine
2010.
Social policy for people with dementia in England: promoting human rights?.
Health & Social Care in the Community,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 5,
p.
511.
Hall, Edward
2011.
Shopping for support: personalisation and the new spaces and relations of commodified care for people with learning disabilities.
Social & Cultural Geography,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 6,
p.
589.
Glendinning, Caroline
Moran, Nicola
Challis, David
Fernández, José-Luis
Jacobs, Sally
Jones, Karen
Knapp, Martin
Manthorpe, Jill
Netten, Ann
Stevens, Martin
and
Wilberforce, Mark
2011.
Personalisation and Partnership: Competing Objectives in English Adult Social Care? The Individual Budget Pilot Projects and the NHS.
Social Policy and Society,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
151.
Baxter, Kate
Glendinning, Caroline
and
Greener, Ian
2011.
The implications of personal budgets for the home care market.
Public Money & Management,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
91.
Carr, Sarah
2011.
Personal budgets and international contexts: Lessons from home and abroad.
Journal of Care Services Management,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
9.
Burau, Viola
Bode, Ingo
Gardin, Laurent
and
Nyssens, Marthe
2011.
Quasi‐marketisation in domiciliary care: varied patterns, similar problems?.
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 3/4,
p.
222.
Netten, A.
Jones, K.
Knapp, M.
Fernandez, J. L.
Challis, D.
Glendinning, C.
Jacobs, S.
Manthorpe, J.
Moran, N.
Stevens, M.
and
Wilberforce, M.
2012.
Personalisation through Individual Budgets: Does It Work and for Whom?.
British Journal of Social Work,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 8,
p.
1556.
Jones, Karen
Netten, Ann
Fernández, José-Luis
Knapp, Martin
Challis, David
Glendinning, Caroline
Jacobs, Sally
Manthorpe, Jill
Moran, Nicola
Stevens, Martin
and
Wilberforce, Mark
2012.
The impact of individual budgets on the targeting of support: findings from a national evaluation of pilot projects in England.
Public Money & Management,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 6,
p.
417.