Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:00:03.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing conversational competence through language awareness and multimodality: the use of DVDs*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

María Moreno Jaén  and
Carmen Pérez Basanta
María Moreno Jaén
Affiliation:
Department of English Philology, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain (email: mmjaen@ugr.es)
Carmen Pérez Basanta
Affiliation:
Department of English Philology, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain (email: cbasanta@ugr.es)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The argument for a pedagogy of input oriented learning for the development of speaking competence (Sharwood-Smith, 1986; Bardovi-Harlig and Salsbury, 2004; Eslami-Rasekh, 2005) has been of increasing interest in Applied Linguistics circles. It has also been argued that multimedia applications, in particular DVDs, provide language learners with multimodal representations that may help them ‘to gain broad access to oral communication both visually and auditory’ (Tschirner, 2001: 305). Thus this paper focuses on an exploratory study of teaching oral interaction through input processing by means of multimodal texts.

The paper is divided into a number of interconnected sections. First, we outline briefly what teaching conversation implies and examine the important role of oral comprehension in the development of conversational interaction. In fact, it has been suggested that effective speaking depends very much on successful understanding (Oprandy, 1994). In this paper we pay special attention to the crucial role of context in understanding oral interactions. Therefore, we outline the theory of context in English Language Teaching (ELT). The discussion draws on approaches to teaching conversation and it also offers a brief reflection about the need for materials which might convey the sociocultural and semiotic elements of oral communication through which meaning is created.

We then discuss the decisions taken to propose a new multimodal approach to teaching conversation from a three-fold perspective: (a) the selection of texts taken from films, and the benefits of using DVDs (digital versatile disc); (b) the development of a multimodal analysis of film clips for the design of activities; and (c) the promotion of a conversation awareness methodology through a bank of DVD clips to achieve an understanding of how native speakers actually go about the process of constructing oral interactions.

In sum, the main thrust of this paper is to pinpoint the advantages of using multimodal materials taken from DVDs, as they provide learners with broad access to oral communication, both visual and auditory, making classroom conditions similar to the target cultural environment (Tschirner, 2001).

Keywords

Conversational competencelanguage awarenessmultimodal analysisDVD technology
Type
Regular Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 283 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddock, B. (1996) Using Films in the English Classroom. Hertfordshire: Phoenix Ltd.Google Scholar
Baldry, A.Thibault, P. J. (2006) Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook with Associated On-line Course. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K.Salsbury, T. (2004) The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective. In: Boxer, D. and Cohen, A. D. (eds.) Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 199–227.Google Scholar
Batstone, R. (1994) Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, N. (2003) Shaken and stirred: Language in film in a cross-cultural perspective. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 8(2/3), 1–9. http://www.spz.tu-darmstadt.de/projekt_ejournal/jg_08_2_3/docs/Baumgarten.pdfGoogle Scholar
Belasco, S. (1967) From Communication to Curriculum. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1986) Investigating listening comprehension in context. Applied Linguistics, 7(3): 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. (1998) Context creation in discourse understanding. In: Malmkjaer, K. and Williams, J. (eds.) Context in Language Learning and Language Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–192.Google Scholar
Brown, G.Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, G. (2001) Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bygate, M. (1987) Speaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. (1986) Teaching Oral English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Carter, R.McCarthy, M. (1995) Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1996) Speech acts. In: McKay, S. L. and Hornberger, N. H. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 383–420.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.Thurrell, S. (1994) Teaching conversational skills intensively: course content and rationale. ELT Journal, 4(1): 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005) Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3): 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S. (1986) Language comprehension in context. Applied Linguistics, 7(3): 226–239.Google Scholar
Goodman, S. (1996) Some elements of English visual grammar. In: Goodman, S. and Graddol, D. (eds.), Redesigning English: New Texts, New Identities. London and New York: Routledge/The Open University, 52–72.Google Scholar
Hadley, G. (2002) Sensing the winds of change: An introduction to Data-Driven Learning. RELC Journal, 33(2): 99–124. http://www.nuis.ac.jp/~hadley/publication/windofchange/windsofchange.htmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.Hasan, R. ([1985] (1998)) Language, Context and Text: A Social Semiotic Perspective. Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hornby, A. S. (1954) The Adventures of Mr West [Oxford Progressive English for Adult Learners]. Book One. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. (1992) Defossilizing. ELT Journal, 46(2): 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klippel, F. (1983) Keep Talking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kozloff, S. (2001) Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C.Andersen, R. W. (1999) Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2): 31–42. http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article1/Google Scholar
Kress, G.van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1992) Semantics, semiotics, and grammatics: an ecosocial view. Paper presented at the 19th International Systemic-Functional Congress, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
Lonergan, J. (1984) Video in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In: de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. B. and Kramsch, C. (eds.) Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–52.Google Scholar
Metcalf, E. (2003) The implications of teaching conversation in the classroom with specific reference to advanced learners and genre. http://www.developingteachers.com/articles_tchtraining/speaking_emma1.htmGoogle Scholar
Nolasco, R.Arthur, L. (1987) Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oprandy, R. (1994) Listening/speaking in second and foreign language teaching. System, 22(2): 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1993) Research update on teaching L2 listening. System, 21(2): 205–211.Google Scholar
Payne, J. S.Ross, B. M. (2005) Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3): 35–54.Google Scholar
Pérez Basanta, C. (1997) Using film posters in the classroom. English Teaching Forum, 35(3): 44–50.Google Scholar
Pérez Basanta, C.Rodríguez Martín, M. E. (2006) Data-driven learning – DDL – as a new tool for teaching conversation: Exploring a small-scale corpus of film scripts. In: Hidalgo, E., Quereda, L. and Santana, J. (eds.) Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 141–158.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1985) The Context of Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rundell, M. (1995) The corpus of the future, the future of the corpus. http://ruf.rice.edu/~barlow/futcrp.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, M. A. (1986) Comprehension vs. acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7: 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shawback, M. J.Terhune, N. M. (2002) Online interactive courseware: using movies to promote cultural understanding in a CALL environment. ReCALL, 14(1): 85–95.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1996) Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In: Willis, J. and Willis, D. (eds.) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. Oxford: Heinemann, 17–30.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1992) Issues and Options in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In: Gass, S. and Madden, C. (eds.) Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235–253.Google Scholar
Thibault, P. J. (2000) The multimodal transcription of a television advertisement: theory and practice. In: Baldry, A. (ed.) Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age. Campo Basso: Palladino, 311–385.Google Scholar
Tschirner, E. (2001) Language acquisition in the classroom: The role of digital video. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(3): 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L. (2002) Language awareness. In: Carter, R. and Nunan, D. (eds.) The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 160–165.Google Scholar
Van Patten, B. (1994) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15: 225–241.Google Scholar
Walker, C. (1999) Teacher’s Guide to Using Film and TV. London: Penguin Longman Publishing. http://www.penguinreaders.com/downloads/PRTGusingfilm&tv.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. (1994) Relevance and understanding. In: Brown, G., Malmkjaer, K., Pollit, A. and Williams, J. (eds.) Language and Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35–58.Google Scholar
Wolvin, A. D.Coakley, C. G. (1985) Listening. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brow.Google Scholar