Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T18:31:55.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CFC Alternatives — A Fresh Look

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Kandadai Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Instrumentation and Services Unit, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India.

Extract

This article examines, through a molecular perspective, the ‘ozone-friendly’ refrigerants R-134a and R-123 vis-à-vis R-12 and R-11, which are targeted to be phased out under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Final Act (1987). It appears that the molecular weight, size parameter, and dipole moment, of R-134a and R-123, may induce a pronounced effect on the chemical equilibrium of ice particles in the polar stratospheric clouds and subsequently influence the photochemical reactions therein.

Non-polar, high-molecular-weight perfluoropropane (R-218), could be a better substitute for R-12, while R-134, which is a non-polar HFC of the ethane family, could also be a candidate although its molecular weight is lower than that of R-12. The search for a good substitute for R-11, however, must continue.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, W. & Jain, A.K. (1990). The CFC greenhouse potential of scenarios possible under the Montreal Protocol. Int. J. Climatology, 10, pp. 439–50, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, G. (1956). Octafluorocyclobutene (C4F8). Kaltetechnik, 8(11), pp. 334–39, illustr.Google Scholar
Chemtox (1991). 2 (3), p. 1.*Google Scholar
Ember, L.R., Layman, P.L., Lepkowski, W. & Zurer, P.S. (1986). Tending the global commons. Chem. & Eng. News, 64(No. 47), pp. 1464, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farman, J. (1987). What hope for ozone layer now? New Scientist, 116 (12 NOV.), pp. 50–4, illustr.Google Scholar
International Institute of Refrigeration (1990). Fifth informatory note on CFCs and refrigeration [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Kurylo, M.T. (1990). The chemistry of stratospheric ozone—its response to natural and anthropogenic influences. Int. J. Refrig., 13, pp. 6272, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLinden, M.O., Gallagher, J.S., Weber, L.A., Morrison, G., Ward, D., Goodwyn, A.R.H., Moldover, M.R., Schmidt, J.W., Chae, H.B., Bruno, T.J., Ely, J.F. & Huber, M.L. (1990). Measurement and formulation of thermodynamic properties of refrigerants R-134a (1, 1, 1, 2-tetrafluoromethane) and R123 (1, 1, dichloro, -2, 2, 2-trifluoroethane). ASHRAE Trans., 96, Part I, pp. 263–83, illustr.Google Scholar
Molina, M.J. & Rowland, F.S. (1974). Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine atom catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature (London), 249, pp. 810–2, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Final Act (1987). United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Shank, R.L. (1967). Thermodynamic properties of 1, 1, 1, 2, 2-pentafluoropropane (Refrigerant 245). J. Chem. Eng. Data, 12, pp. 474–80, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankland, I.R., Basu, R.S. & Wilson, D.P. (1988). Thermal conductivity and viscosity of a new stratospherically safe refrigerant — 1, 1, 1, 2- tetrafluoroethane (R-134a), in ‘Status of CFCs — Refrigeration Systems and Refrigerant Properties’, Int. Inst. Refrig., Comm. B1.B2, El & E2, pp. 305–14, illustr.Google Scholar
Spauschus, H.O. (1988). HFC-134a as a substitute for CFC-12. Int. J. Refrig., 11, pp. 389–92, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, K. & Murthy, M.V. Krishna (1985). Corresponding states treatment of refrigerants and cryogenic liquids. Int. J. Refrig., 8, pp. 143–6, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar