CJO - Abstract - Network Analysis for International Relations

Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
International Organization (2009), 63 : 559-592 Cambridge University Press
doi:10.1017/S0020818309090195 (About doi)
Available on CJO 15 July 2009 (?)
Cambridge Journals Online - CUP Full-Text Page
International Organization (2009), 63:559-592 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2009
doi:10.1017/S0020818309090195

Research Article

Network Analysis for International Relations


Emilie M. Hafner-Burtona1, Miles Kahlera2 and Alexander H. Montgomerya3

a1 Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and Department of Politics, Princeton University. E-mail: ehafner@princeton.edu
a2 School of International Relations and Pacific Studies and Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego. E-mail: mkahler@ucsd.edu
a3 Department of Political Science, Reed College, Portland, Oregon. E-mail: ahm@reed.edu
Article author query
hafner-burton em Google Scholar
kahler m Google Scholar
montgomery ah Google Scholar

Abstract

International relations research has regarded networks as a particular mode of organization, distinguished from markets or state hierarchies. In contrast, network analysis permits the investigation and measurement of network structures—emergent properties of persistent patterns of relations among agents that can define, enable, and constrain those agents. Network analysis offers both a toolkit for identifying and measuring the structural properties of networks and a set of theories, typically drawn from contexts outside international relations, that relate structures to outcomes. Network analysis challenges conventional views of power in international relations by defining network power in three different ways: access, brokerage, and exit options. Two issues are particularly important to international relations: the ability of actors to increase their power by enhancing and exploiting their network positions, and the fungibility of network power. The value of network analysis in international relations has been demonstrated in precise description of international networks, investigation of network effects on key international outcomes, testing of existing network theory in the context of international relations, and development of new sources of data. Partial or faulty incorporation of network analysis, however, risks trivial conclusions, unproven assertions, and measures without meaning. A three-part agenda is proposed for future application of network analysis to international relations: import the toolkit to deepen research on international networks; test existing network theories in the domain of international relations; and test international relations theories using the tools of network analysis.

Footnotes

The authors thank Robert O. Keohane, Daniel H. Nexon, Woody Powell, participants in the 2008 Harvard Networks in Political Science Conference, and the editors of International Organization for valuable comments on earlier drafts of this article.


Cambridge University Press