Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:20:37.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Slide-agglutination for rapid serological typing of Treponema hyodysenteriae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

D. J. Hampson
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A slide agglutination (SA) test was developed to determine the serogroup of isolates of Treponema hyodysenteriae of serogroups A to F. Rabbit antisera which are normally used for serogrouping T. hyodysenteriae in an agarose gel doublediffusion precipitation test (AGDP) were not suitable for SA because they agglutinated isolates from more than one serogroup. The agglutination reaction was made serogroup-specific by cross-absorbing the typing sera for serogroups A to F with whole treponemes from the other 5 of these 6 serogroups of T. hyodysenteriae. The absorbed sera were reacted in slide agglutination tests with 33 isolates of T. hyodysenteriae and with four non-T. hyodysenteriae intestinal spirochaetes. None of the non-T. hyodysenteriae isolates agglutinated, but 27 of the 33 isolates of T. hyodysenteriae did. The results for 26 of the 27 agglutination reactions agreed with the serogroup as determined in AGDP. One of the 6 isolates of T. hyodysenteriae which failed to react in slide agglutination was of serogroup B, 1 of serogroup D, 1 each were from new serogroups G, H and I, and 1 was untypable in AGDP.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Taylor, DJ, Alexander, TJL.The production of dysentery in swine by feeding cultures containing a spirochaete. Brit Vet J 1971; 127: 5861.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Harris, DL, Glock, RD, Christensen, CR, Kinyon, JM.Swine dysentery. I. Inoculation of pigs with Treponema hyodysenteriae (new species) and reproduction of the disease. Vet Med Small Animal Clinician 1972; 67: 61–4.Google Scholar
3.Baum, DH, Joens, LA. Serotypes of beta-haemolytic Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infect Immun 1979; 25: 792–7.Google Scholar
4.Hampson, DJ, Mhoma, JRL, Combs, BG, Buddie, JR.Proposed revisions to the serological typing system for Treponema hyodysenteriae. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 102: 7584.Google Scholar
5.Hampson, DJ, Mhoma, JRL, Combs, BG, Lee, JI. Serological grouping of Treponema hyodysenteriae. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 105: 7986.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Hampson, DJ.New serogroups of Treponema hyodysenteriae (G, H and I). Vet Rec 127: 524.Google Scholar
7.Joens, LA, Whipp, SC, Glock, RD, Nuessen, ME. Serotype-specific protection against Treponema hyodysenteriae infection in ligated colonic loops of pigs recovered from swine dysentery. Infect Immun 1983; 39: 460–2.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Parizek, R, Stewart, R, Brown, K, Blevins, D.Protection against swine dysentery with an inactivated Treponema hyodysenteriae bacterin. Vet Med 1985; 80: 80–6.Google Scholar
9.Hunter, D, Wood, T.An evaluation of the API ZYM system as a means of classifying spirochaetes associated with swine dysentery. Vet Rec 1979; 104: 383–4.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Taylor, DJ, Simmons, JR., Laird, HM.Production of diarrhoea and dysentery in pigs by feeding pure cultures of a spirochaete differing from Treponema hyodysenteriae. Vet Rec 1980; 106: 326–32.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Kunkle, RA, Harris, DL, Kinyon, JM.Autoclaved liquid medium for propagation of Treponema hyodysenteriae. J Clin Micro 1986; 24: 669–71.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Burrows, AIR, Lemcke, RM.Identification of Treponema hyodysenteriae by a rapid slide agglutination test. Vet Rec 1981; 108: 187–9.Google Scholar
13.Lemcke, RM, Bew, J. Antigenic differences among isolates of Treponema hyodysenteriae. Proc Int Pig Vet Soc Cong, Ghent, Belgium 1984; 183.Google Scholar