Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:12:52.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SECRETORY RESPONSE TO CHOLERA TOXIN IN THE PORCINE JEJUNUM UNDER DIFFERENT TYPES OF GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2001

J. S. MALTBÆK
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
M. L. GRØNDAHL
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
P. BERGGREEN
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
C. G. NIELSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Studies, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
J. E. THORBØLL
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
E. SKADHAUGE
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
M. B. HANSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Investigations of intestinal secretion are often performed under anaesthesia. This study evaluates the influence of anaesthetic agents on the intestinal secretion induced by cholera toxin (CT) in the pig. CT was instilled for 4 h in ligated jejunal loops under anaesthesia with halothane, saffan, [alpha]-chloralose, or propofol. Cardiovascular parameters, blood gas data, plasma cortisol levels, net fluid accumulation, intraluminal mediators (serotonin (5-HT), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)) and electrolyte concentrations in the accumulated fluid were determined. The systolic blood pressure and heart rate was highest for saffan-anaesthetized pigs (blood pressure: saffan > [alpha]-chloralose > propofol = halothane; heart rate: saffan > [alpha]-chloralose = propofol = halothane), while blood gases and cortisol levels were within the same range. CT induced a dose-dependent fluid accumulation under all four anaesthetics. The fluid accumulation was significantly higher in pigs treated with saffan, [alpha]-chloralose and propofol than in halothane-treated pigs (saffan = [alpha]-chloralose > propofol > halothane). There was no significant difference in electrolyte concentrations in the accumulated fluid or in the luminal content of 5-HT and PGE2 between anaesthetics. The results demonstrate that anaesthetic agents profoundly influence the secretory response in the small intestine and indicate the importance of the choice of anaesthetic in this type of experiment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Physiological Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)