Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Short Communication

No compelling evidence against feedback in spoken word recognition

Michael K. Tanenhaus a1, James S. Magnuson a1, Bob McMurray a1 and Richard N. Aslin a1
a1 Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627 {mtan; magnuson; [email protected] [email protected]


Norris et al.'s claim that feedback is unnecessary is compromised by (1) a questionable application of Occam's razor, given strong evidence for feedback in perception; (2) an idealization of the speech recognition problem that simplifies those aspects of the input that create conditions where feedback is useful; (3) Norris et al.'s use of decision nodes that incorporate feedback to model some important empirical results; and (4) problematic linking hypotheses between crucial simulations and behavioral data.