Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:56:48.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effectiveness of a prenatal education programme for the prevention of congenital toxoplasmosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. O. Carter ,
S. B. Gelmon ,
G. A. Wells  and
A. P. Toepell
A. O. Carter*
Affiliation:
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada
S. B. Gelmon
Affiliation:
Association of University Programs in Health Administration, Arlington, Virginia, USA
G. A. Wells
Affiliation:
Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada
A. P. Toepell
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada
*
Dr Anne O. Carter, Chief, Disease Surveillance Division, Bureau of Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0L2, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A 10 min education programme was developed which, if effective in changing the behaviour of pregnant women, would eliminate or greatly reduce the risk of congenital toxoplasmosis. It was taught in 26 randomly selected (case) prenatal classes offered to women early in their pregnancy. The remaining 26 (control) classes received routine class material which did not mention toxoplasmosis. A questionnaire was administered to all women prior to this early class (pre-test) and again after the last prenatal class, held just prior to delivery (post-test). Changes in pet, food and personal hygiene behaviour between the pre- and post-test were determined and a score calculated by adding points for change towards those behaviours recommended in the programme and subtracting points for change in the opposite direction. Cat owners in case classes had a significantly higher score in pet hygiene behaviour than those in control classes (P < 0·05). No significant difference was found between the food or personal hygiene scores of women in case and control classes, possibly because of low power. However, although behaviours did not differ on the pre-test, women in case classes had significantly better cooking methods for roast beef and hamburger on the post-test (P < 0·05 and P < 0·01 respectively). It is concluded that this programme is effective and should be offered to all women in order to reduce congenital toxoplasmosis incidence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 539 - 545
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

1.Remington, JS, Desmonts, G. Toxoplasmosis. In Remington, JS, Klein, JO. eds. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. 2nd ed.Saunders: Philadelphia. 1983; 143–263.Google Scholar
2.Carter, AO, Frank, J.Congenital toxoplasmosis: epidemiologic features and control. Can Med Assoc J 1986; 135: 618–23.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Hunter, K, Stagno, S, Capps, E, Smith, R.Prenatal screening of pregnant women for infections caused by cytomegalovirus. herpesvirus. rubella and Toxoplasma gondii. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 145: 269–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Williams, KAB, Scott, SM, Macfarlane, DE, Williamson, JM, Elias-Jones, TF, Williams, H.Congenital toxoplasmosis: a prospective survey in the west of Scotland. J Infect 1981; 3: 219–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Ruoss, CF, Bourne, GL.Toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Brit Commonwealth 1972; 79: 1115–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Hall, SM.Congenital toxoplasmosis in England. Wales and Northern Ireland: some epidemiological problems. Br Med J 1983: 287: 453–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Kimball, AC, Kean, BH, Fuchs, F.Toxoplasmosis: Risk variations in New York City obstetric patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 119: 208–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Henderson, JB, Beattie, CP, Hale, EG, Wright, T.The evaluation of new services: Possibilities for preventing congenital toxoplasmosis. Int J Epidemiol 1984: 13: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Wilson, CB, Remington, JS.What can be done to prevent congenital toxoplasmosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138: 357–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Frenkel, JK.Congenital toxoplasmosis: Prevention or palliation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 359–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Frenkel, JK.Breaking the transmission chain of Toxoplasma: a program for the prevention of human toxoplasmosis. Bull NY Acad Med 1974; 50: 228–35.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Frenkel, JK, Dubey, JP.Toxoplasmosis and its prevention in cats and man. J Infect Dis 1972; 126: 664–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Husband, L.Antenatal education: its use and effectiveness. Health Visitor 1983; 56: 409–10.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Davis, CD, Marrone, FA.An objective evaluation of a prepared childbirth program. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962; 84: 1196–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Leonard, RF.Evaluation of selection tendencies of patients preferring prepared childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 1973; 42: 371–7.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Province of Ontario. Mandatory Health Programs and Services, guidelines under an Act Respecting the Protection and Promotion of the Health of the Public. Queens Printer, Toronto. 06 1984.Google Scholar
17.Langford, ER, Thompson, EG, Tripp, SC.Smoking and health education in pregnancy: evaluation of a program for women in prenatal class. Can J Public Health 1983; 74: 285–9.Google Scholar
18.Ferland, F, Piper, MC.Evaluation of a sensory-motor education programme for parents-to-be. Child: care, health and development 1981; 7: 245–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Goodson, JG, Buller, C, Goodson, WH.Prenatal child safety education. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 312–15.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Wiles, LS.The effect of prenatal breast feeding education on breastfeeding success and maternal perception of the infant. JOGN Nursing 1984; 13: 253–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Huseman, RC, Lahiff, JM, Hatfield, JD.Business communication strategies and skills. Hinsdale, 2: The Dryden Press, 1981; 92–4.Google Scholar
22.Gould, D.Locally organised antenatal classes and their effectiveness. Nursing Times 1986; 82: 59–61.Google ScholarPubMed
23.American Public Health Association Resolution 8401: Infant mortality among the poor. Am J Public Health 1985; 75: 295.Google Scholar