Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T15:34:47.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cité teens entextualizing French TV host register: Crossing, voicing, and participation frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

CHANTAL TETREAULT*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28223cmtetrea@uncc.edu

Abstract

This article addresses data that reside at the confluence of three types of linguistic “crossing” (Rampton 1995) among working-class French teens of predominantly Algerian descent. Strategically using the microphone of the researcher to imitate an elite French television show host, performers create indirect reported speech and direct stylized voicing for present peers and thereby mock them as show “guests.” Through analysis of such data, this article contributes to scholarship that extends and refines Goffman’s notions of footing and participation frameworks, and the relationships imaginable between them. It is argued that the notions of noncongruent voicing effects and generalized footing can lead to a more sophisticated understanding of the relationship between language crossing and participation frameworks. More specifically, analyzing language crossing in terms of the resultant voicing effects sheds light upon the nuanced ways that speakers manage participation frameworks. (Register, crossing, footing, participation frameworks, voicing)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In Holquist, Michael (ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Basso, Keith (1979). Portraits of “the whiteman”: Linguistic play and cultural symbols among the Western Apache. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Henri (1997). “Nouveau français,” “parler jeune,” ou “langue des cités”?: Remarques sur un object linguistique médiatiquement identifié. Langue Française 114:6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (2003). Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7:398–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, Sally & Hanna Meinhof, Ulrike (eds.), Language and masculinity, 47–4. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chun, Elaine (2005). Taking the mike: Performances of everyday identities and ideologies at a U.S. high school. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Symposium About Language and Society – Austin, Texas Linguistic Forum 49:39–49.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2004). The meaning of style. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin, Texas Linguistic Forum 47:41–53.Google Scholar
Gadet, Françoise (1996). Le français ordinaire. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar (2006). In the kingdom of political correctness impoliteness reigns supreme: An analysis of impoliteness in The O’Reilly Factor, with Bill O’Reilly, the number one show in cable television news in the USA. Paper presented at the 2007 Linguistic Impoliteness and Rudeness Conference, Huddersfield, UK.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990). Interstitial argument. In Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2004). Participation. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 222–44. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1999). Participation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9:177–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudaillier, Jean-Pierre (1997). Comment tu tchatches!: Dictionnaire du français contemporain des cités. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Hanks, William (1996). Exorcism and the description of participant roles. In Silverstein, Michael & Urban, Greg (eds.), Natural histories of discourse, 160–202. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane (1998). Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist 103:680–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1992). Insult and responsibility: Verbal abuse in a Wolof village. In Hill, Jane & Irvine, Judith (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 104–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1996). Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In Silverstein, Michael & Urban, Greg (eds.), Natural histories of discourse, 131–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith (2001). “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 21–43. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koven, Michèle (2001). Comparing bilinguals’ quoted performances of self and others in tellings of the same experience in two languages. Language in Society 30:513–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LePoutre, David (1997). Coeur de banlieue: Codes, rites, et langages. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In Drew, Paul & Wootton, Anthony (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interactional order, 161–227. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Marcyliena (1999). No woman no cry: Claiming African American women’s place. In Bucholtz, Mary, Liang, A. C., & Sutton, Laurel A. (eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse, 27–45. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking context, 335–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierre-Adolphe, Philippe; Mamoud, Max; & Tzanos, Georges-Olivier (1995). Le dico de le banlieue. Paris: La Sirène.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1998). Investigating “self-conscious” speech: The performance register in Okracoke English. Language in Society 27:53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seguin, Boris, & Teillard, Frédéric (1996). Les céfrans parlent aux français: Chronique de la langue des cités. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith & Selby, Henry (eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 11–56. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Paul (2004). Algeria in France: Transpolitics, race, and nation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tetreault, Chantal (2002). “You call that a girl?”: Borderwork in a French cité. In Benor, Sarah, Rose, Mary, Sharma, Devyani, Sweetland, Julie, & Zhang, Qing (eds.), Gendered practices in language, 33–59. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Wihtol de Wenden, Catherine, & Daoud, Zakya (1994). Banlieues…intégration ou explosion? Panoramiques 2:12.Google Scholar