Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T09:42:46.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The organization of the soul : Elias and Foucault on discipline and the self

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Robert van Krieken
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Note Critique
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , December 1990 , pp. 353 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariès, Philippe, 1989, Introduction, in Chartier, Roger (ed), A History of Private Life. III: Passions of the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Asad, Talal, 1987, On ritual and discipline in medieval Christian monasticism, Economy & Society, XVI, 2, 160–203.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt, 1987, Legislators and Interpreters. On modernity, post-modernity and intellectuals (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de, 1957, The Second Sex (New York, Alfred A. Knopf).Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, 1952, Compliant behaviour and individual personality, American Journal of Sociology, LVIII, 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, 1967, Tradition and modernity reconsidered, Comparative Studies in Society & History, IX, 292–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, John F., 1977, Individualism and Conformity in Medieval Western Thought, in Banari, Amin & Vryonis, Speros Jr. (eds), Individualism and Conformity in Classical Islam (Wiesbaden, Otto Harrassowitz), pp. 145–158.Google Scholar
Berg, J. H. van den, 1957, Metabletica, of Leer Der Veranderingen. Beginselen van een Historische Psychologie (Nijkerk, Callenbach).Google Scholar
Blok, Anton, 1977, Hinter Kulissen, in Gliechmann, Peter, Goudsblom, Johan & Korte, Hermann (eds), Materialien zu Norbert Elias' Zivilisationstheorie (Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Blum, Jeromy, 1971, The internal structure and polity of European village community from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century, Journal of Modern History, XLIII, 541–576.Google Scholar
Bogner, Artur, 1989, Zivilisation und Rationalisierung. Die Zivilisationstheorien Max Webers, Norbert Elias' und der Frankfurter Schule im Vergleich (Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag).Google Scholar
Bossy, John, 1970, The counter-reformation and the people of Catholic Europe, Past & Present, XLVII, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossy, John, 1983, The Mass as a social institution 1200–1700, Past & Present, C, 29–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossy, John, 1985, Christianity in the West 1400–1700 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bouwsma, William J., 1973, Lawyers and early modern culture, American Historical Review, LXXVIII, 2, 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, Stefan, 1978, Die Evolution der Disziplin Zum Verhältnis von Rationalität und Herrschaft in Max Webers Theorie der vorrationalen Welt, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie u. Sozialpsychologie, XXX, 3, 409–437.Google Scholar
Breuer, Stefan, 1988, Über die Peripetien der Zivilisation. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Norbert Elias, in König, Helmut (ed.), Politische Psychologie heute (Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag), pp. 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, Roger (ed.), 1989, A History of Private Life. III: Passions of the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel, 1964, The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Chicago, Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
Delumeau, Jean, 1977, Catholicism between Luther and Voltaire: a new view of the counter-reformation (London, Burns & Oates).Google Scholar
Dickson, T. & McLachlan, H. V., 1989, In search of ‘The Spirit of Capitalism’: Weber's Misinterpretation of Franklin, Sociology, XXIII, 1, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorwart, R. A., 1971, The Prussian Welfare State before 1740 (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreßen, Wolfgang, 1982, Die Pädagogische Maschine. Zur Geschichte der Industrialisiierten Bewusstseins in Preussen/Deutschland (Frankfurt a.M., Ullstein).Google Scholar
Duerr, Hans Peter, 1988, Nackheit und Scham. Der Mythos vom Zivilisationsprozess (Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto, 1987, The Return of the Middle Ages, in Travels in Hyperreality (London, Picador), pp. 61–85.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1987, What is Sociology? (London, Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1982 a, The Civilizing Process. I: The History of Manners (New York, Pantheon).Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1982 b, The Civilizing Process. II: Power & Civility (New York, Pantheon).Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1984, Knowledge and Power: an interview by Peter Ludes, in Stehr, Nico & Meja, Volker (eds), Society and Knowledge: Contemporary perspectives in the sociology of knowledge (New Brunswick, Transaction Books), pp. 251–291.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert, 1987, Die Gesellschaft der Individuen (Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Erdheim, Mario, 1982, Die gesellschaftliche Produktion von Unbewusstheit. Eine Einführung in den ethnopsychoanalytischen Prozess (Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Erdheim, Mario, 1987, Hexenwahn, Kulturzerstörung und gesellschaftliche Produktion von Unbewußtheit, in Belgrad, Jürgen, Görlich, Bernard, König, Hans-Dieter, Noerr, Gunzelin Schmid (eds), Zur Idee einer psychoanalytischen Sozialforschung (Frankfurt a.M., Fischer), pp. 151–162.Google Scholar
Flap, Henk & Kuiper, Yme, 1981, Figurationssoziologie als Forschungsprogramm, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie u. Sozialpsychologie, XXXIII, 273–301.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1977 a, Discipline and Punish. The birth of the prison (London, Allen Lane).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1979, Governmentality, Ideology & Consciousness, VI, 5–21.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1980, Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (Brighton, Harvester).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1981, The History of Sexuality. I: An Introduction (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1982, The Subject and Power, in Dreyfus, Hubert L. & Rabinow, Paul, Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (Brighton, Harvester Press), pp. 208–226.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, 1986, Disciplinary power and subjection, in Lukes, Steven (ed.), Power (Oxford, Basil Blackwell), pp. 229–242.Google Scholar
Franke, Herman, 1988, Opvoeding als doelbewuste civilisering: Een penitentiar beschavingsoffensief in het interbellum, Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift, XV, 1, 108–130.Google Scholar
Frankfurt Institute for Social Research, 1973, Aspects of Sociology (London, Heinemann).Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich, 1978, The Method and Function of an Analytic Social Psychology, in Arato, Andrew & Gebhardt, Eike (eds), The Essential Frankfurt School Reader (Oxford, Basil Blackwell), pp. 477–496.Google Scholar
Frykman, Jonas & Loefgren, Orvar, 1987, Culture Builders: a historical anthropology of middle-class life (New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. & Gergen, Mary M. (eds), 1984, Historical Social Psychology (Hillsdale, N. J., Lawrence Erlbaum).Google Scholar
Given, James, 1989, The inquisitors of Languedoc and the medieval technology of power, American Historical Review, LXXXXIV, 2, 336–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleichmann, Peter R., 1988, Zur Historisch-Soziologischen Psychologie von Norbert Elias, in Jüttemann, Gerd (ed.), Wegbereiter der Historischen Psychologie (München/Weinheim, Beltz-Psychologie Verlags Union), pp. 451–462.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin, 1987, The Soul of the Citizen: Max Weber and Michel Foucault on rationality and government, in Lash, Scott & Whimster, Sam (eds), Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity (London, Allen & Unwin), pp. 293–316.Google Scholar
Goudsblom, Johan, 1984, Zum Hintergrund der Zivilisationstheories von Norbert Elias: Das Verhältnis zu Huizinga, Weber und Freud, in Gleichmann, Peter, Goudsblom, Johan & Korte, Herman (eds), Macht und Zivilisation: Materialien zu Norbert Elias' Zivilisationstheorie. (II: Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp), pp. 129–147.Google Scholar
Greenfield, K. R., 1915, Sumptuary Law in Nümberg: a study in paternal government (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press).Google Scholar
Gurevich, Aron, 1988, Medieval popular culture. Problems of belief and perception (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hahn, Alois, 1982, Zur Soziologie der Beichte und andere Formen institutionalisierter Bekenntnisse: Selbstthematisierung und Zivilisationsprozess, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie u. Sozialpsychologie, XXXIV, 408–434.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, 1983, De Cive (Oxford, Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Honegger, Claudia, 1987, Hexenprozesse und ‘Heimlichkeiten der Frauenzimmer’: Geschlechtsspezifische Aspekte von Fremdund Selbstthematisierung, in Hahn, Alois & Kapp, Volker (eds), Selbstthematisierung und Selbstzeugnis: Bekenntnis und Geständnis (Farnkfurt a.M., Suhrkamp), pp. 95–109.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, 1982, Critical Theory. Selected essays (New York, Continuum).Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan, 1972 [1924]. The Waning of the Middle Ages (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
Jütte, Robert, 1981, Poor relief and social discipline in sixteenth-century Europe, European Studies Review, XI, 1, 25–52.Google Scholar
Jütte, Robert, 1984, Obrigkeitliche Armenfürsorge in Deutschen Reichsstädten der Fruhen Neuzeit. Städtisches Armenwesen in Frankfurt am Main und Köln (Köln, Böhlau Verlag).Google Scholar
Jüttemann, Gerd (ed.), 1988, Wegbereiter der Historischen Psychologie (München/Weinheim: Beltz-Psychologie Verlags Union).Google Scholar
Kamper, Dieter, 1986, Zur Soziologie der Imagination (München, Carl Hanser).Google Scholar
Kieser, Alfred, 1987, From asceticism to administration of wealth. Medieval monasteries and the pitfalls of rationalization, Organization Studies, VII, 2, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieken van, Robert, 1986, Social theory and child welfare: beyond social control, Theory & Society, XV, 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieken van, Robert, 1989 a, Violence, self-discipline and modernity: beyond the ‘civilizing process’, Sociological Review, XXXVII, 2, 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieken van, Robert, 1989 b, Towards ‘Good and useful men and women’: the state and childhood in Sydney, 1840–1890, Australian Historical Studies, XXIII, 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieken van, Robert, 1990, Social Discipline and state formation. Weber and Oestreich on the historical sociology of subjectivity, Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift, XVII, 1, 3–28.Google Scholar
Kruithof, Bernard, 1982, De deugdzame natie. Het burgerlijk beschavingsoffensief van de Maatschappij tot Nut van 't Algemeen tussen 1784 en 1860, in Kruithof, Bernard, Noordman, Jan & De Rooy, Piet (eds), Geschiedenis van opvoeding en onderwijs (Nijmegen, Socialistische Uitgeverij Nijmegen), pp. 363–377.Google Scholar
La Fontaine, J. S., 1985, Person and Individual: some anthropological reflections, in Carrithers, M., Collins, S. & Lukes, S. (eds), The Category of the Person (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher, 1973, Origins of the Asylum, in The World of Nations: reflections on American history, politics and culture (New York, Alfred A. Knopf).Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher, 1977 The Culture of Narcissism (New YorkWarner).Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf, 1976. History and anthropology. A historical appraisal of the current contact between the disciplines, Social Science Information, XV, 2/3, 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf, 1977, Problems of a. Historical Study of Science, in Mendelsohn, Everret, Weingart, Peter & Whitley, Richard (eds), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge. Sociology of the sciences. I: 1977 (Dordrecht, Reidel), pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
Levi, Giovanni, 1988, Inheriting Power : the story of an exorcist (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Lis, Catharina & Soly, Hugo, 1984, Policing the Early Modern Proletariat, 1450–1850, in Levine, David (ed.), Proletarianization and Family History (Orlando, Academic Press), pp. 163–228.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Christopher, 1989, Realism, structurism, and history. Foundations for a transformative science of society, Theory & Society, XVIII, 4, 451–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, Alan, 1986, Marriage and Love in England (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Macfarlane, Alan, 1987, The Culture of Capitalism (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Mandrou, Robert, 1975, Introduction to Modem France 1500–1640. An essay in historical psychology (London, Edward Arnold).Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl, 1940, Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. Studies in modern social structure (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert, 1969, Eros and Civilisation (New York, Sphere).Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, 1954 [1887], Capital. I (Moscow, Progress Publishers).Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert, 1934, Mind, Self, and Society. From the standpoint of a social behaviourist (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Melossi, Dario, 1990, The State of Social Control. A sociological study of concepts of state and social control in the making of democracy (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
Michielse, H. C. M., 1990, Policing the poor: J. L. Vives and the sixteenth century origins of modern social administration, Social Service Review, LXIV, 1, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzman, Arthur, 1987, The civilizing offensive: mentalities, high culture and individual psyches, Journal of Social History, XX, 4, 663–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. I., 1987, The Formation of a Persecuting Society: power and deviance in Western Europe, 950–1250 (Oxford, Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Muchembled, Robert, 1985, Popular Culture and Elite Culture in France 1400–1750 (Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press).Google Scholar
Münch, Richard, 1984, Die Struktur der Moderne. Grundmuster und differentielle Gestaltung des institutionellen Aufbaus der modernen Gesellschqften (Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis, 1946 [1934], Technics and Civilization (London, George Routledge & Sons).Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert, 1987, The Making of Modern Society (Brighton, Wheatsheaf Books).Google Scholar
O'Neill, John, 1986. The disciplinary society: from Weber to Foucault, British Journal of Sociology, XXXVII, 1, 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard, 1982, Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B., 1974, Is Female to Male as Nature is to Culture?, in Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist & Lamphere, Louise (eds), Women, Culture, and Society (Stanford, Stanford University Press), pp. 67–88.Google Scholar
Piccone, Paul, 1988, Rethinking protestantism, capitalism and a few other things, Telos, LXXVIII, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeff, Marc, 1975, The well-ordered police state and the development of modernity in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Europe: an attempt at a comparative approach, American Historical Review, LXXX, 5, 1221–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeff, Marc, 1983, The Weil-Ordered Police State. Social and institutional change through law in the Germanies and Russia, 1600–1800 (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Reich, Wilhelm, 1972, Sex-Pol Essays, 1929–1934 (New York, Vintage Books).Google Scholar
Riesman, David, 1950, The Lonely Crowd. A study of the changing American character (New Haven, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, 1990, Governing the Soul: technologies of human subjectivity (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Schilling, Heinz, 1987, ‘History of Crime’ or ‘History of Sin’? Some reflections on the social history of early modern church discipline, in Kouri, E. I. & Scott, Tom (eds), Politics and Society in Reformation Europe (London, Macmillan), pp. 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlumbohn, Jürgen, 1980, ‘Traditional’ collectivity and ‘modern’ individuality: some questions and suggestions for the historical study of socialization. The examples of the German upper and lower bourgeoisies around 1800, Social History, V, 1, 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, Robert W., 1987, Police and the Territorial State in Sixteenth-century Württemberg, in Kouri, E. I. (eds), Politics & Society in Reformation Europe (London, Macmillan), pp. 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sennett, Richard, 1977, The Fall of Public Man (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Shorter, Edward, 1975, The Making of the Modern Family (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg, 1964, The Sociology of Georg Simmel (New York, Free Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Denis, 1984, Review article: Norbert Elias, established or outsider? Sociological Review, XXXII, 2, 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonntag, Michael, 1988, Die Seele als Politikum. Psychologie und die Produktion des Individuums (Berlin, Dietrich Riemer).Google Scholar
Sonntag, Michael, 1989, Die Erzeugung von Innenräumen. Machtwirkungen in der Genese abendländischer Individualität, Psychologie u. Geschichte, I, 1, 36–45.Google Scholar
Spiegel, G. M., 1988, Moral imagination and the rise of the bureaucratic state: images of government in the Chronique des Rois de France, Chantilly, MS. 869, Journal of Medieval & Renaissance Studies, XVIII, 2, 157–173.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Steven, 1987, Security and Control in Capitalist Societies: the fetishism of security and the secret thereof, in Lowman, John, Menzies, Robert J. & Palys, T. S. (eds), Transcarceration: essays in the sociology of social control (Aldershot, Gower).Google Scholar
Stretton, Hugh, 1969, The Political Sciences. General principles of selection in social science and history (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 1989 a, Inwardness and the Culture of Modernity, in Honneth, Axel, McCarthy, Thomas, Offe, Claus, Wellmer, Albrecht (eds), Zwischenbetrachtungen: Im Prozess der Aufklärung (Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp), pp. 601–623.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 1989 b, Sources of the Self: the making of the modern identity (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Tentler, Thomas N., 1974, The summas for confessors as an instrument of social Control, in Trinkaus, Charles & Oberman, Heiko A. (eds), The Pursuit of Holiness in Late Medieval and Renaissance Religion (Leiden, E. J. Brill), pp. 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tentler, Thomas N., 1977, Sin and Confession on the Eve of the Reformation (Princeton, N. J., Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P., 1967, Time, work discipline and industrial capitalism, Past and Present, XXXVIII, 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiber, H. & Steinert, H., 1980, Die Fabrikation des zuverlässigen Menschen. Über die ‘Wahlverwandschaft’ von Kloster- und Fabrikdisziplin (München, Heinz Moos).Google Scholar
Vink, E., 1989, ‘Ende nyemant en moet…’ Laat-middleeuwse stedelijke overheden en hun keuren ten aanzien van geboorte, huwelijk en sterven, Volkskundig Bulletin, XV, 1, 34–59.Google Scholar
Verrips, Kitty, 1987, Noblemen, farmers and labourers: a civilizing offensive in a Dutch village, Netherlands Journal of Sociology, XXIII, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1924, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik (Tübingen, J. C. B. Mohr).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1946, The Sociology of the World Religions, in Gerth, H. & Mills, C. W. (eds), From Max Weber: essays in sociology (New York, Oxford University Press), pp. 267–301.Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1949, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York, Free Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1951, The Religion of China (Glencoe, Ill., Free Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1952, Ancient Judaism (Glencoe, Ill., Free Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1974, The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism (London, Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1978 a, Economy and Society. I & II, ed. by Roth, Guenther & Wittich, Claus (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, 1978 b, Anticritical last word on ‘The spirit of capitalism’, American Journal of Sociology, LXXXIII, 5, 1105–1131.Google Scholar
Weißbrod, Bernd, 1981, Wohltätigkeit und ‘symbolische Gewalt’ in der Frühindustrialisierung. Städischer Armut und Armenpolitik im Wuppertal, in Mommsen, Hans & Schulse, Winfried (eds), Vom Elend der Handarbeit (Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta), pp. 334–357.Google Scholar
Wirth, Jean, 1984, Against the acculturation thesis, in von Greyerz, Kaspar (ed.), Religion and Society in Early Modern Europe 1500–1800 (London, Allen & Unwin), pp. 66–78.Google Scholar