a1 Queen's University
a2 Ministry of Health and Long Term Care
a3 Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital
a4 Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University
a5 McMaster University
a6 Hamilton Health Sciences
a7 University of Toronto and Toronto General Hospital
a8 Ministry of Health and Long Term Care and University of Toronto
a9 University of Toronto
a10 Ministry of Education
Abstract
Objectives: This study describes the development of a framework for health technology decisions, for Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC) in Ontario, Canada.
Methods: OHTAC convened a “Decision Determinants Sub-Committee” in January 2007, which undertook a systematic literature review and conducted key informant interviews to develop an explicit decision-making framework.
Results: The “Decision Determinants Sub-Committee” offered recommendations about decision criteria, and the process by which decisions are made. Decision criteria include (i) overall clinical benefit, (ii) consistency with societal and ethical values, (iii) value for money, and (iv) feasibility of adoption into the health system. The decision process should be transparent and fair and should use a deliberative process in delivering recommendations.
Conclusions: This methodology is currently being pilot tested in a live environment: OHTAC. It will be evaluated and revised according to its feasibility, acceptability, and perceived usefulness.
Keywords:
Footnotes
This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs Program for Dr. Ana Johnson. Funding is provided by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care for those with Ministry affiliation. The authors acknowledge personal support from the F. Norman Hughes Chair in Pharmacoeconomics for Dr. Murray Krahn, all other members of the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC) in the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care for their support, and the contribution from the following individuals regarding their views on processes for recommendations related to different settings: Dr. Anthony Culyer, Dr. Alan Detsky, Dr. Gord Guyatt, Mr. Ronald Sapsford, and Mr. Frank Wagner.