Baeck, Louis. 1994. The Mediterranean tradition in economic thought. Routledge history of economic thought series. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Belda, Francisco. 1963. Etica de la creación de créditos según la doctrina de Molina, Lesio y Lugo. Excerpta ex dissertatione ad Lauream in Facultate Philosophica Pontificiae Universitatis Gregorianae. Madrid: Sucs. de Rivadeneyra.Google Scholar

Beutels, Robert. 1987. Leonardus Lessius 1554–1623. Portret van een zuidnederlandse laat-scholastieke econoom. Een bio-bibliografisch essay. Wommelgem: Den Gulden Engel.Google Scholar

Carpintero, Benítez. 2003. “Los escolásticos españoles en los inicios del liberalismo político y jurídico.” Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos 25: 341–373.Google Scholar

Chafuen, Alejandro A. 2003. Faith and liberty. The economic thought of the late scholastics. Studies in ethics and economics. Lanham-Boulder-New York-Oxford: Lexington.Google Scholar

Clavero, Bartolomé. 1991. Antidora. Antropología católica de la economía moderna. Per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno, 39. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Decock, Wim. 2005. Breaking the limits. De “homo oeconomicus” ontketend in Lessius’ denken over markt en prijs? Leuven [unpublished master's thesis].Google Scholar

Decock, Wim. 2006. “Leonardus Lessius en ‘De koopman van Rhodes.’ Een schakelpunt in het denken over economie en ethiek.” De zeventiende eeuw 22 (2): 247–261.Google Scholar

Decock, Wim. 2007. “Leonardus Lessius on Buying and Selling (1605). Translation and Introduction.” Journal of Markets and Morality 10 (2): 433–516.Google Scholar

Decock, Wim. 2008. “L'usure face au marché: Lessius (1554–1623) et l'escompte des lettres obligataires.” In Girollet, Anne, ed., Le droit, les affaires et l’argent. Célébration du bicentenaire du code de commerce, MSHDB, 65. Dijon.Google Scholar

De-Juan, Oscar and Fabio, Monsalve. 2006. “Morally ruled behaviour: the neglected contribution of scholasticism.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (1): 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Roover, Raymond. 1969. Leonardus Lessius als economist. De economische leerstellingen van de latere scholastiek in de Zuidelijke Nederlanden. Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Letteren, 31.1. Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar

Feenstra, Robert. 1973. “L'influence de la Scolastique espagnole sur Grotius en droit privé: quelques expériences dans des questions de fond et de forme, concernant notamment les doctrines de l'erreur et de l'enrichissement sans cause.” In Grossi, Paolo, ed., La seconda scolastica nella formazione del diritto privato moderno. Atti del Incontro di studio (Firenze, 16–19 ottobre 1972), Per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno 1. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Gómez Camacho, Francisco. 1981. Luís de Molina. La teoría del justo precio. Edición preparada por Francisco Gómez Camacho. Madrid: Editora Nacional.Google Scholar

Gómez Camacho, Francisco. 1998a. Economía y filosofía moral: la formación del pensamiento económico europeo en la Escolástica española. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis.Google Scholar

Gómez Camacho, Francisco. 1998b. “Later scholastics: Spanish economic thought in the 16th and 17th centuries.” In Lowry, Todd S. and Gordon, Barry, eds., Ancient and medieval economic ideas and concepts of social justice. Leiden: Brill Publishers.Google Scholar

Gordley, James. 1992 [1991]. The philosophical origins of modern contract doctrine. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, Barry. 1975. Economic Analysis before Adam Smith. Hesiod to Lessius. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice-Hutchinson, Marjorie. 1952. The School of Salamanca. Readings in Spanish Monetary Theory. 1544–1605. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Haggenmacher, Peter. 1997. “Droits subjectifs et système juridique chez Grotius.” In Foisneau, L., ed., Politique, droit et théologie chez Bodin, Grotius et Hobbes. Paris: Editions Kimé.Google Scholar

Hamouda, Omar and Price, Betsy B.. 1997. “The justice of the just price.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 4(2): 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hénaff, Marcel. 2003. “Religious ethics, gift exchange and capitalism.” Archives européennes de sociologie 44(3): 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonsen, Albert R. and Stephen, Toulmin. 1988. The abuse of casuistry. A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Koslowski, Peter. 1991. “Ethische Oekonomie und theologische Deutung der Gesamtwirklichkeit in der Summa Theologiae des Thomas von Aquin.” In Koslowski, Peter et al. , eds., Oekonomie, Politik und Ethik in Thomas von Aquins ‘Summa Theologiae.’ Vademecum zu einem Klassiker der Wirtschaftsethik. Klassiker der Nationalökonomie. Düsseldorf: Handelsblatt.Google Scholar

Langholm, Odd Inge. 1979. Price and value in the Aristotelian tradition. A study in scholastic economic sources. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Langholm, Odd Inge. 1998. The legacy of scholasticism in economic thought. Antecedents of choice and power. Historical perspectives on modern economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapidus, André. 1994. “Norm, virtue and information: the just price and individual behaviour in Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 1(3): 435–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noell, Edd S. 2001. “In pursuit of the just wage: a comparison of reformation and counter-reformation economic thought.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23(4): 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noonan, John T. 1957. The scholastic analysis of usury. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pinckaers, Servais. 1985. Les sources de la morale chrétienne. Sa méthode, son contenu, son histoire. Études d’éthique chrétienne, 14. Fribourg: Éditions universitaires.Google Scholar

Schefold, Bertram, ed. 1999. Leonardus Lessius’ De iustitia et iure. Vademecum zu einem Klassiker der spätscholastischen Wirtschaftsanalyse. Klassiker der Nationalökonomie. Düsseldorf: Verlag Wirtschaft und Finanzen der Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1972 [1954]. History of economic analysis. Edited from manuscript by Elizabeth Boody Schumpeter. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Spies, Marijke. 1990. “De koopman van Rhodes. Over de schakelpunten van economie en cultuur.” De zeventiende eeuw 6(1): 166–174.Google Scholar

Stone, Martin W. F. and Toon, Van Houdt. 1999. “Probabilism and its methods: Leonardus Lessius and his contribution to the development of Jesuit casuistry.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 75: 359–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Martin W. F. 2004. “Scrupulosity, probabilism, and conscience. The origins of the debate in early modern scholasticism.” In Braun, Harald and Vallance, Edward, eds., Contexts of conscience in early modern Europe, 1500–1700. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon. 1998a. Leonardus Lessius over lening, intrest en woeker. De iustitia et iure, lib. 2, cap. 20. Editie, vertaling en studie, Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België. Klasse der Letteren, 162. Brussels: Paleis der Academiën.Google Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon. 1998b. “Tradition and renewal in late scholastic economic thought: the case of Leonardus Lessius (1554–1623).” The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 28(1): 51–73.Google Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon. 1998c. “‘Lack of money’: a reappraisal of Lessius’ contribution to the scholastic analysis of money-lending and interest-taking.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 5(1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon. 1998d. “De economische ethiek van de Zuid-Nederlandse jezuïet Leonardus Lessius (1554–1623): een geval van jezuïtisme?” De zeventiende eeuw 14(1): 27–37.Google Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon. 1999a. “The economics of art in early modern times: some humanist and scholastic approaches.” In De Marchi, Neil and Goodwin, Craufurd D., eds., Economic Engagements with Art. Annual Supplement to Volume 31, History of Political Economy. Durham-London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon. 1999b. “Spelen om geld. Gokken, wedden en loten in het moraaltheologische discours in de Zuidelijke Nederlanden (einde zestiende—begin zeventiende eeuw).” De zeventiende eeuw 15(1): 61–73.Google Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon. 2000. “Just pricing and profit making in late scholastic economic thought.” In Sacré, Dirk and Tournoy, Gilbert, eds., Myricae. Essays on Neo-Latin literature in honour of Jozef IJsewijn. Supplementa Humanistica Lovaniensia, 16. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Van Houdt, Toon and Wim, Decock. 2005. Leonardus Lessius: traditie en vernieuwing. Antwerpen: vzw Marie Belpaire.Google Scholar

Vereecke, Louis. 1991. “Le probabilisme.” Le Supplément. Revue d'Ethique et Théologie Morale 177: 23–31.Google Scholar

Vivenza, Gloria. 2001. “The ‘Northern’ Cicero: on the fortuna of the De Officiis in central Europe.” Mésogeios 13–14: 201–27.Google Scholar

Vivenza, Gloria. 2004. “Renaissance Cicero. The ‘economic’ virtues of De officiis I, 22 in some sixteenth century commentaries.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 11(4): 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Wilhelm. 1959. Wirtschaftsethik am Vorabend des Liberalismus. Höhepunkt und Abschluss der scholastischen Wirtschaftsbetrachtung durch Ludwig Molina S.J. (1535–1600). Schriften des Instituts für christliche Sozialwissenschaften an der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 13. Münster.Google Scholar

Whitman, James. 1996. “The moral menace of Roman law and the making of commerce: some Dutch evidence.” Yale Law Journal 105(7): 1841–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Jeffrey T. and Gordon, Barry. 1992. “Economic justice in the natural law tradition: Thomas Aquinas to Francis Hutcheson.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amesius, Guilielmus, De conscientia et ejus iure vel casibus libri quinque (Amstelodami, ca. 1650) [1632].Google Scholar

Aragonensis, Petrus, De iustitia et iure (Venetiis, 1595) [Salmanticae, 1590].Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De Officiis. In Cicéron, Les devoirs. Livres II et III. Texte établi et traduit par Maurice Testard, Collection des Universités de France, Paris, 1970.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, De iure belli ac pacis (Amsterdami, 1631) [Parisii, 1625].Google Scholar

Lessius, Leonardus, De iustitia et iure (Antverpiae, 1621) [Lovanii, 1605].Google Scholar

Lessius, Leonardus, Variorum casuum conscientiae resolutiones. In Wijns, I., ed., L. Lessii opera posthuma (Lovanii, 1645).Google Scholar

Lessius, Leonardus, De beatitudine et actibus humanis praelectiones. In Wijns, I., ed., L. Lessii opera posthuma (Lovanii, 1645).Google Scholar

Ligorio, Alphonsus de, Theologia moralis. In Opera moralia Sancti Alphonsi Mariae de Ligorio. Theologia moralis. Editio nova cura et studio Leonardi Gaudé, tom. 2 (Romae, 1907) [Neapoli, 1748]Google Scholar

Medina, Ioannes, De poentitentia, restitutione et contractibus (Ingolstadii, 1581) [Salmanticae, 1550].Google Scholar

Molina, Ludovicus, De iustitia et iure (Moguntiae 1659 [Cuencae, 1597]).Google Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, De jure naturae et gentium. In Böhling, F., ed., Samuel Pufendorf. De jure naturae et gentium. Zweiter Teil: Text (Liber quintus—Liber octavus), in the series of Schmidt-Biggemann, W., ed., Samuel Pufendorf. Gesammelte Werke, Band 4.2 (Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 1998)].Google Scholar

Summenhart, Conradus, De contractibus (Hagenau, 1513 [1500]).Google Scholar