Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T20:14:57.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GUNNAR MYRDAL AND THE SCIENTIFIC WAY TO SOCIAL DEMOCRACY, 1914–1968

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åkerman, Brita. 1997. Alva Myrdal. Från Storbarnkammare till Fredspris. Stockholm: Bokförlaget Cordia.Google Scholar
Amadae, Sonia M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, Stellan. 1999. “On the Value of Personal Archives.” Nordeuropa Forum: Zeitschrift für Politik, Wirtschaft und Kultur 1: 15–27.Google Scholar
Angresano, James. 1997. The Political Economy of Gunnar Myrdal: An Institutional Basis for the Transformation Problem. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger. 2005. “Economists, Values and Ideology: A Neglected Agenda,” Revue de Philosophie Economique 11: 3155.Google Scholar
Barber, William. 2008. Gunnar Myrdal: An Intellectual Biography. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Michael. 2001. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bok, Sissela. 1992. Alva Myrdal: A Daughter's Memoir. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Carlson, Alan. 1990. The Swedish Experiment in Family Politics: The Myrdals and the Interwar Population Crisis. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Childs, Marquis. 1936. Sweden: The Middle Way. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Colander, David. 2005. “Economics as an Ideologically Challenged Science.” Revue de Philosophie Economique 11: 9–30.Google Scholar
Craver, Earlene. 1991. “Gösta Bagge, the Rockefeller Foundation, and Empirical Social Science Research in Sweden, 1924–1940.” In Jonung, Lars, ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, Donald. 1955. “The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory: A Review.” The Journal of Political Economy 63 (1): 82–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostaler, Gilles. 1990. “An assessment of Gunnar Myrdal’s early work in economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought vol. 12 (2): 196–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dostaler, Gilles, Ethier, Diane, and Lepage, Laurent, eds., 1992. Gunnar Myrdal and His Work. Montreal: Harvest.Google Scholar
Dykema, Eugene. 1986. “No View without a Viewpoint: Gunnar Myrdal.” World Development 14 (2): 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekerwald, Hedvig. 2000. “Alva Myrdal: Making the Private Public.” Acta Sociologica 43 (4): 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliaeson, Sven. 2000. “Gunnar Myrdal: A Theorist of Modernity.” Acta Sociologica 43 (4): 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, Ralph. 1944. “American Dilemma: A Review.” The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New York: Modern Library, 1995.Google Scholar
Fölster, Kaj. 1992. De Tre Löven—En Myrdals Efterskrift. Stockholm: Bonnier.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays on Positive Economics. Part I. The Methodology of Positive Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hederberg, Hans. 2004. Sanningen, inget annat än sanningen: Sex decennier ur Alva och Gunnar Myrdals liv. Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar
Henriksson, Rolf. 1991. “The Political Economy Club and the Stockholm School, 1917–1951.” In Jonung, Lars, ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John. 1954. “Review of Gunnar Myrdal, The Political Element.” Economic Journal (64): 793–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirdman, Yvonne. 1989. Att Lägga Livet Till Rätta—Studier i Svensk Folkhemspolitik. Stockholm: Carlsson.Google Scholar
Hoover, Kenneth. 2003. Economics as Ideology: Keynes, Laski, Hayek, and the Creation of Contemporary Politics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jackson, Walter A. 1990. Gunnar Myrdal and America's Conscience: Social Engineering and Racial Liberalism, 1938–1987. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Walter A. 2002. Alva Myrdal's Critique of American Politics and Society in the New Deal Era, working paper.Google Scholar
Jonung, Lars. 1991. “Introduction and Summary.” In Jonung, L., ed., The Stockholm School of Economics Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Arjo, and McCloskey, Deidre. 1998. “The Rhetoric of Disagreement.” In Prychitko, David L., ed., Why Economists Disagree: An Introduction to Alternative Schools of Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Violet, and Myrdal, Alva. 1956. Women's Two Roles: Home and Work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, 1968.Google Scholar
Leonard, Tim. 2003. “‘More Merciful and Not Less Effective’: Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 687–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundberg, Erik. 1974b. “Gunnar Myrdal's Contribution to Economic Theory.” The Swedish Journal of Economics 76 (4): 472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynd, Robert S. 1939. Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, Stina E. 2001. “The Myrdals and the Thomases 1930–1940: The Trials and Tribulations of a Cross Atlantic Research Collaboration” In Mucha, J., Kaesler, D., and Winclawski, W., eds., Mirrors and Windows: Essays in the History of Sociology. Torun: Nicholas Copernicus University Press, pp. 219–234.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz. 1955. “Review of Gunnar Myrdal, The Political Element.” American Economic Review 45: 948–52.Google Scholar
GMA: Gunnar Myrdal Archives. Stockholm: Arbetarrorelsens Arkiv.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva. 2003. De Blå Kuverten: Kärleksbreven Juli 1919-Augusti 1920, edited by Hirdman, Yvonne. Stockholm: Gidlunds Förlag.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1927. Prisbildningsproblement och Föränderligheten. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1930. The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory. Translated by Streeten, P.. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1990.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1932a. “Socialpolitikens Dilemma 1–2.” Spektrum (3): 1–13; (4):13–31.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1932b. “Om Penningteoretisk Jämvikt: En Studie över den ‘Normala Räntan' i Wicksells Penninglära.” Ekonomisk Tidskrift 33 (5–6).Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1933. “Der Gleichgewichtsbegriff als Instrument der Geldtheoretischen Analyse.” In Hayek, F. A., ed., Beiträge zur Geldtheorie. Vienna: Springer Verlag, pp. 361–487.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1939. Monetary Equilibrium. London: W. Hodge.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper, 1964.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1957. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: G. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1958. Values in Social Theory: A Selection of Essays on Methodology, edited by Streeten, P.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1960. Beyond the Welfare State: Economic Planning in the Welfare States and its International Implications. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. A Twentieth Century Fund Study, 3 vols. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1969. Objectivity in Social Research. London: Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1972. “Luncheon in Honor of Gunnar and Alva Myrdal: Response to Introduction.” The American Economic Review 62 (1/2): 456–462.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1982. Hur Styrs landet? Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1987. Historien om An American Dilemma. Stockholm: SNS Forlag.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 2005. The Essential Gunnar Myrdal, edited by Appelqvist, O. and Andersson, S.. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar, and Myrdal, Alva. 1934. Kris i befolkningsfrågan. Stockholm: Tiden.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar, and Myrdal, Alva. 1941. Kontakt med Amerika. Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Jan. 1982. Barndom. Stockholm: Norsteldt.Google Scholar
Nair, Kusum. 1962. Blossoms in the Dust: The Human Factor in Indian Development. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Nair, Kusum. 1969. “Asian Drama: A Critique.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 17 (4): 449–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Samuels, Warren J., ed. 1976. The Chicago School of Political Economy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
Southern, David W. 1987. Gunnar Myrdal and Black–White Relations: The Use and Abuse of “An American Dilemma,” 1944–1969. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Streeten, Paul. 1992. “Gunnar Myrdal: The Man and the Theorist.” In Dostaler, G., et al. ., eds., Gunnar Myrdal and his Work. Montreal: Harvest.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 1990. “Introduction to the Transaction Edition.” In Myrdal, G. 1930. The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory, translated by Streeten, P.New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. vii–xxxvi.Google Scholar
Tilton, Timothy. 1992. “Gunnar Myrdal and the Swedish Model.” In Dostaler, G., et al. , eds., Gunnar Myrdal and his Work. Montreal: Harvest.Google Scholar
Vinterhed, Kerstin. 2003. Kärlek i tjugonde seklet: En biografi över Alva och Gunnar Myrdal. Stockholm: Atlas.Google Scholar
Wisselgren, Per. 2006. Regulating the Science Policy Boundaries: The Myrdals and the Swedish Tradition of Governmental Commissions, working paper.Google Scholar